Biofeedback and Differential Conditioning of Response Patterns in the Skeletal Motor System

  • Eberhard E. Fetz
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 2)


While biofeedback techniques are being extensively applied in operantly conditioning an impressive variety of central and autonomic nervous system responses, our ignorance of the neural mechanisms underlying operant learning remains virtually complete. Indeed, we still have the most elementary and speculative conception of how the nervous system initiates a simple voluntary motor response, no less how the occurrence of such a response can be modified by reinforcement. Our understanding of neural mechanisms underlying operant responding will probably advance soonest in the skeletal motor system, for several reasons. A basic understanding of the neural pathways converging onto spinal motoneurons has emerged from a century of anatomical and electrophysiological studies. More recently developed experimental techniques now make it possible to study activity of identified neurons in awake animals trained to perform relevant motor responses. In such experiments, biofeedback techniques could prove particularly useful in investigating functional relations between elements of the skeletal motor system. We will first review some relevant facts concerning the functional organization of the final elements in the skeletal motor system and then consider past and potential applications of biofeedback techniques to investigate this system.


Motor Unit Pyramidal Tract Correlate Response Precentral Cell Extensor Carpus Radialis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Basmajian, J. V. Muscles alive. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Chang, H. T., Ruch, T. C., & Ward, A. A., Jr. Topographical representation of muscles in motor cortex of monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1947, 10, 39–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Evarts, E. V. Representation of movements and muscles by pyramidal tract neurons of the precentral motor cortex. In M. D. Yahr & D. P. Purpura (Eds.), Neurophysiological basis of normal and abnormal motor control. Hewlett, New York: Raven Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. Evarts, E. V. Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1968, 31, 1427.Google Scholar
  5. Fetz, E. E. Operant conditioning of cortical unit activity. Science, 1969, 163, 955–957.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fetz, E. E. Operant control of single unit activity and correlated motor responses. In M. Chase (Ed.), Operant control of brain activity. Los Angeles: UCLA Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. Fetz, E. E., Cheney, P. D., & German, D. C. Corticomotoneuronal connections of precentral cells detected by post-spike averages of EMG activity in behaving monkeys. Brain Research, 1976, 114, 505–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fetz, E. E., & Baker, M. A. Operantly conditioned patterns of precentral unit activity and correlated responses in adjacent cells and contralateral muscles. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1973, 36, 179–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fetz, E. E., & Finnochio, D. V. Operant conditioning of specific patterns of neural and muscular activity. Science, 1971, 174, 431–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fetz, E. E., & Finocchio, D. V. Correlations between activity of motor cortex cells and arm muscles during operantly conditioned response patterns. Experimental Brain Research, 1975, 23, 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fetz, E. E., & Wyler, A. R. Operantly conditioned firing patterns of epileptic neurons in motor cortex of chronic monkey. Experimental Neurology, 1973, 40, 586–607.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanerz, J. Discharge properties of motor units in relation to recruitment order in voluntary contraction. Acta Physiol. Scand., 1974, 91, 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison, V. F., & Mortensen, O. A. Identification and voluntary control of single motor unit activity in the tibialis anterior muscle. Anatomical Record, 1962, 144, 109–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henneman, E., Shahani, B. T., & Young, R. R. The extent of voluntary control of human motor units. In M. Shahani (Ed.), The motor system: Neurophysiology and muscle mechanisms. New York: Elsevier, 73–78.Google Scholar
  15. Henneman, E., Somjen, G., & Carpenter, D. O. Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1965, 28, 599–620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Humphrey, D. R., Schmidt, D. M., & Thompson, W. D. Predicting measures of motor performance from multiple cortical spike trains. Science, 1970, 170, 758–762.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuypers, H. G. J. M. Central cortical connections to the motor and somatosensory cell groups. An experimental study in the rhesus monkey. Brain, 1960, 83, 161–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luschei, E. S., Garthwaite, C. R., & Armstrong, M. E. Relationship of firing patterns of units in face area of monkey precentral cortex to conditioned jaw movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1971, 34, 552–561.Google Scholar
  19. Mendell, L. M., & Henneman, E. Terminals of single Ia. fibers: Location, density and distribution within a pool of 300 homonymous motoneurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1971, 34, 171–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Olds, J. Operant conditioning of single unit responses. Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Physiological Science, 1965, 372–380.Google Scholar
  21. Phillips, C. G., & Porter, R. The pyramidal projection to motoneurons of some muscle groups of the baboon’s forelimb. Progress in Brain Research, 1964, 12, 222–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Porter, R. Early facilitation at corticomotoneuronal synapses. Journal of Physiology, London, 1970, 207, 733–745.Google Scholar
  23. Porter, R., & Hore, J. Time course of minimal corticomotoneuronal excitatory postsynaptic potentials in lumbar motoneurones of the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1969, 32, 443–451.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Preston, J. B., & Whitlock, D. G. Intracellular potentials recorded from motoneurons following precentral gyrus stimulation in primates. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1961, 24, 91–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eberhard E. Fetz
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Physiology & Biophysics and Neurological Surgery and Regional Primate Research CenterUniversity of Washington at SeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations