Theta Regulation and Radar Vigilance Performance

  • James F. O’Hanlon
  • Jackson W. Royal
  • Jackson Beatty
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 2)


The “vigilance decrement” is the gradual, unconscious loss of the ability to react effectively to infrequent, unpredictable but critical events in passive, monotonous work. It was first identified from records of hostile submarine contacts reported by surface and airborne British radar operators during World War II (see Baker, 1962). That finding was rapidly confirmed by American and Canadian investigators in studies of military personnel operating simulated radar and sonar systems (Anderson & Lindsley, 1944; Solandt & Partridge, 1946). Mackworth’s (1950) classic work followed, and established the methodological precedence which was later followed in literally hundreds of laboratory studies of vigilance phenomena (Davies & Tune, 1970). Mackworth’s famous “clock test” was the first laboratory abstraction of the radarman’s task, and although he was careful to validate the results it produced through comparison with data obtained in a simulated radar task, later workers generally lost sight of the raison d’être for vigilance research. Most workers chose to study vigilance using college student subjects who performed simplistic monitoring tasks in impoverished laboratory environments. To be sure, much valuable information was acquired over the years. In particular, basic psychophysiological concepts of arousal and habituation were studied in the context of prolonged monitoring tasks and a useful, though limited, picture of the relationship between vigilance and brain functions emerged. Nonetheless, the artificial nature of the usual experimental approach has recently caused some to question the practical relevance of the behavioral results and, by implication, the generality of laboratory-established psychophysiological relationships (Kibler, 1965; Teichner, 1972). Our work followed from earlier demonstrations of a basic relationship between the EEG theta rhythm and vigilance, and our own initial success in applying biofeedback for controlling theta. It was also intended to provide results that might be generalized to occupational settings with a minimum risk of exaggeration.


Theta Activity Monitoring Task Radar Operator Vigilance Decrement Simulated Radar 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, J. H., and Lindsley, D. B. (Eds.) Radar operator “fatigue”: The effects of length and repetition of operating periods on efficiency of performance. Office of Scientific Research and Development Report No. O. S. R. D. 33334, 1944.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, C. H. Man and radar displays. New York: Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar
  3. Beatty, J., and Figueroa, C. Period analytic algorithms for the estimation of selected spectral properties of short segments of EEG data. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1974, 6, 293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beatty, J., Greenberg, A., Deibler, W. P., and O’Hanlon, J. F. Operant control of occipital theta rhythm affects performance in a radar monitoring task. Science, 1974, 183, 871–873.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beatty, J., and O’ITanlon, J. F. EEG theta regulation and radar monitoring performance of experienced radar operators and air traffic controllers. UCLA Technical Report, March 1975.Google Scholar
  6. Budzynski, T. Biofeedback procedures in the clinic. Seminars in Psychiaya, 1973, 5, 537–547.Google Scholar
  7. Daniel, R. S. Alpha and theta EEG in vigilance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 25, 697–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies, D. R., and Tune, G. S. Human vigilance performance. London: Staples Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  9. Groll, E. Zentralnervose und periphere Aktivierungs variable gei Vigi- lanzleistungen. Z. Exp. Ang. Psychol., 1966, 13, 248–264.Google Scholar
  10. Ford, D., Wilson, C. E., Townsend, R., and Johnson, L. C. Theta suppression effects on complex visual sonar operation. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual ARPA Self-Regulation Symposium, Grand Teton, Wyoming, June 1975.Google Scholar
  11. Jasper, H. E. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1958, 10, 371–375.Google Scholar
  12. Kibler, A. W. The relevance of vigilance research to aerospace monitoring tasks. Human Factors, 1965, 7, 93–99.Google Scholar
  13. Lawrence, G. H., and Johnson, L. C. Biofeedback and performance. San Diego State University Foundation (San Diego, California) Technical Report, 1976.Google Scholar
  14. Mackworth, N. I. Researches on the measurement of human performance. Medical Research Council Special Report No. 268, London, IT. M.S.O., 1950.Google Scholar
  15. McBain, W. N. Arousal, monotony, and accidents in line driving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1970, 54, 509–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Hanlon, J. F., and Beatty, J. Concurrence of electroencephalographic and performance changes during a simulated radar watch and some implications for the arousal theory of vigilance. In R. R. Mackie (Ed.), Vigilance II: Relationships among theory, physiological correlates, and operational performance. New York: Plenum, in press.Google Scholar
  17. O’Hanlon, J. F., Royal, J. W., and Beatty, J. EEG theta regulation and radar monitoring performance in a controlled field experiment. Human Factors Research, Inc. (Goleta, California), Technical Report 1738-F, September 1975.Google Scholar
  18. Oswald, I. Sleeping and waking. New York: Elsevier, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saltzberg, B. Period analysis. In M. Matousek (Ed.), Evaluation of bioelectrical data from brain, nerve and muscle, II. Part A. Frequency and correlation analysis. In A. Reymond (Ed.), Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology 5A. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1973.Google Scholar
  20. Solandt, D. Y., and Partridge, D. M. Research on auditory problems presented by Naval operations. Journal of Canadian Medical Services, 1946, 3, 323–329.Google Scholar
  21. Stoyva, J., and Budzynski, T. Cultivated low arousal-an antistress response? In L. V. DiCara (Ed.), Limbic and autonomic nervous system research. New York: Plenum, 1974.Google Scholar
  22. Teichner, W. F. Predicting human performance III: The detection of a simple visual signal as a function of time of watch. New Mexico State University (Las Cruces) Technical Report 72–1, June 1972.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, H. L., Granda, A. L., Jones, R. C., Lubin, A., and Armington, J. C. EEG frequency and finger pulse volume as predictors of reaction time during sleep loss. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1962, 14, 64–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • James F. O’Hanlon
    • 1
  • Jackson W. Royal
    • 1
  • Jackson Beatty
    • 2
  1. 1.Human Factors Research IncorporatedUSA
  2. 2.University of California at Los AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations