Perceptual Organisation and the Design of the Man-Computer Interface in Process Control

  • H. T. Smith
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 1)


The advent of the second generation of process control computers has brought about a considerable change in the role and importance of the human operator. In place of several individual, semi-independent control units there is a trend towards more complex hierarchical systems. The operator increasingly occupies a supervisory function in co-ordinating and regulating information supplied by, and to, automatic sub-systems. Lower level machines implement the actual continuous control; the operator is principally concerned with making short to intermediate term plans in the face of anticipated or unexpected events. Such systems place great emphasis on the development of the operator’s supervisory technique; which is dependent on the design of the man-computer interface. This paper is concerned with interface design, particularly the use of computer generated displays to present information in perceptually ‘assimilable’ forms. An experiment is described which demonstrates how the representation of a control problem may inflence the interactive program user’s performance.


Perceptual Organisation Resource Allocation Problem Polar Plot Pattern Group Pattern Representation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. BATTERSBY A and BERNERS-LEE M, 1968, Communication through interactive diagrams. In Computer Graphics in Management (Edited by E Green and R Parslow) (London: Gower Press)Google Scholar
  2. EDWARDS E and LEES F, 1973, Man and Computer in Process Control (London: Instn. Chem. Engrs.)Google Scholar
  3. EDWARDS E and LEES F, 1974, The Human Operator in Process Control (London: Taylor and Francis)Google Scholar
  4. FREEDY J, HULL F, LUCACCINI L and LYMAN J, 1971, A computer based learning system for remote manipulator control. IEEE Trans. on SMC, SMC-1, 356–363Google Scholar
  5. KETTERINGHAM P J and O’BRIEN D D, 1974, A simulation study of computer-aided soaking pit scheduling. In Edwards E and Lees F op citGoogle Scholar
  6. KROLAK P and FELTS W, 1971, A man-machine approach toward the travelling salesman problem. Comm. ACM. 15,4, 327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. MCCORMICK E J, 1964, Human Factors Engineering (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
  8. RASMUSSEN J and GOODSTEIN L P, 1972, Experiments on data presentation to process operators in diagnostic tasks. Danish Atomic Energy Commission. Riso Report 256Google Scholar
  9. RASMUSSEN J, 1974, The Human Data Processor as a Systems Component. Danish Atomic Energy Commission. Riso Report M-1722Google Scholar
  10. SHERIDAN T B, 1972, Supervisory Control of Teleoperators. In Displays and Controls (Edited by R BERNOTAT and K GARTNER) (Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger).Google Scholar
  11. SIME M, FITTER M and GREEN T, 1975, The Congenial Computer? MRC (Sheffield) Social and Applied Psychology Unit Memo 67Google Scholar
  12. SMITH H T and CRABTREE R, 1975, Interactive Planning. Int. Jnl. Man-Machine Studies, 7, 213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. WEST B and CLARK J A, 1974,Operator interaction with a computer controlled distillation column. In E EDWARDS and F LEES op citGoogle Scholar
  14. WOLFF H T, 1970, The hospital ward — a technological desert. In Instruments in Working Environments (London: Adam Hilger) p 90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. T. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentBradford UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations