Human Performance in Manual Process Control
Manual Process Control tasks in industry are legion. The operator must control such a complex process in real time with strict limitations on any deviations from optimum performance if the process is to be economically viable. Chemical processes (Kragt & Landeweerd, 1974), steel making processes (Bainbridge et al, 1968)*, paper mills (Attwood, 1970)*, and glass manufacturers (Drury & Hill, 1973) have been studied with a view to improving operator performance.
KeywordsHill Climbing System Performance Measure Signal Flow Graph Industrial Operator Human Factor Society
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- References marked in the text with (*) can be found in Edwards & Lees (1974). They are not listed separately for reasons of space.Google Scholar
- Buck, J.R. and Hancock, W.M. Manual optimization of ill structured problems. Proceedings of Human Factors Society 19th Annual Meeting, 321–328, Dallas, Texas, 1975.Google Scholar
- Coe, D.D., Baum, A.S. and Drury, C.G. (unpublished) Laboratory simulations of process control tasks, submitted to Human Factors, 1975.Google Scholar
- Drury, C.G. and Baum, A.S. (in press) Manual Process Control — A case study and a challenge, submitted to Applied Ergonomics, 1975.Google Scholar
- Drury, C.G. and Hill, J.W. Studies of manual process control in the glass industry. Paper to 5th IEA Congress, Amsterdam, 1973.Google Scholar
- Edwards, E. and Lees, F.P. Man and Computer in Process Control, Institute of Chemical Engineers, London, 1973.Google Scholar
- Edwards, E. and Lees, F.P. The Human Operator in Process Control, Taylor & Francis, London, 1974.Google Scholar
- Fleishman, E.A. and Hempel, W.E. Changes in factor structure of a complex psychomotor task as a function of practice. Psychometrika, 19, 239–252.Google Scholar
- Rigby, R.H. Studies of a manual process control task using a laboratory analogue. Unpublished B.S. thesis, University of Liverpool, 1972.Google Scholar
- Savoyant, A. Diagnostic dans une etude de poste de l’industrie chimique, Travail Humain, 34, 177–182.Google Scholar