Problems with People, Decision, Conflict, Language and Measurement

  • K. C. Bowen
  • J. I. Harris
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 3)


Every now and then, a researcher should stop and consider where he is going. He will find that his various, self-imposed, tasks have spread out into a number of superficially different areas, and that the focus of his main concern has changed. He will feel that his past and current interests are coherent, hut he will not he ahle immediately to define that coherence. He will perceive that they are interconnected, because they have stemmed from one another, hut he will not he ahle to identify their relative importances to the purpose that now motivates him.


Operational Research Simple Game HARRIS Cability Operational Researcher Tavistock Publication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bowen, K.C. and Smith, D.G. , Development of Models for Application to Conflict Problems, in Collins, L. (ed.), Social Issues in the Seventies, No. 4., The Use of Models in the Social Sciences, Tavistock Publications, London, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strong, J.P., Application of the Concept of Pattern Recognition to Provide a Framework for Research into Command and Control at the Tactical Level, DOAE Memorandum, M7040, May, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowen, K.C., The Structure and Classification of Operational Research Games, DOAE Memorandum, M7117, June, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    . Harris, J.I., Some Concepts of a Conflict Game, DOAE Memorandum 7420, December, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    White, D.J., and Bowen, K.C. (eds.), The Role and Effectiveness of Theories of Decision in Practice, Proceedings of Conference held in Luxembourg in August 1973 under the aegis of the NATO Science Committee, Hodder and Stoughton, London, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    White, D.J., Decision Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, London, 1975.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ackoff, R.L. et al., Towards a Quantitative Theory of the Dynamics of Conflict, Management Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, February, 1968.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emshoff, J.R. and Ackoff, R.L., Explanatory Models of Interactive Choice Behaviour, J.Conflict Resolution, 1970, XIV, 1.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Howard, N., Some Developments in the Theory and Application of Metagames, General Systems, 1970, XV.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dando, M.R. and Bee, A.J., Operational Research and Human Behaviour: Towards the Monitoring of Decision Making in Conflicts through the Study of Experimental Games, OR Department, University of Sussex, 1976 (for publication).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ackoff, R.L. and Emery, F.E., On Purposeful Systems: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Individual and Social Behaviour as a System of Purposeful Events, Tavistock Publications, London, 1972.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bowen, K.C. Purposeful Systems and Operational Research, Opl Res.Q., 1975, 26, 1, ii, pp. 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bowen, K.C., Some Notes on Purposeful Systems, DOAE Research Working Paper CM 10, February, 1975.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bowen, K.C., Helping with Decisions on Complicated Systems, 2nd. Inter-American Conference on Systems and Informatics (II CIASI), Mexico City, Mexico, November, 1974.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bowen, K.C., Where Techniques are Lacking, Commonwealth Defence Science Organisation Symposium on Operational Research, New Delhi, India, December, 1975.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harris, J.I. and Bowen, K.C., Notes on the Analyst and Decision-Maker: Interaction and Perceptions. Unpublished notes. Dated 19 May, 1975.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bowen, K.C., Operational Research Methodology, DOAE Research Working Paper CM 11 , January, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    White, D.J., Decision Theory, Aldine Pub. Co., Chicago, 1969.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bowen, K.C., Some Comments on the Scope of Gaming, DOAE Research Working Paper CC5, July, 1972.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bowen, K.C., Models and Decision Processes, in ref. 5.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stratton, A. and Bowen, K.C., The Information Content of Data, DOAE Working Paper D/WP/7502 (Revised), November, 1975. (to be published).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harris, J.I., Some Concepts of a Conflict Game, DOAE Memorandum 7420, December, 1974.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harris, J.I., Games for Research into Conflict, a supporting paper, NATO Conference on Environmental Assessment of Socio-Economic Systems, Istanbul, Turkey, October, 1976.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hicks, D., The Management of 120-Bed Clinical Nursing Units: An Account of Research Carried out in the Five Years 1970–74, Wessex Regional Health Authority, Winchester, 1976.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ackoff, R.L., and Sasieni, M.W., Fundamentals of Operational Research, Wiley, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bee, A.J., Testing Emshoff’s Choice and Policy Matching Theories of Behaviour in Simple Mixed-Motive Games with Subjects from a Different Culture, BSc thesis, University of Sussex (OR) 1974.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dando, M.R. and Bee, A.J., An Investigation of a Methodology for the Study of Decision-Making Behaviour in Conflicts and Crises, Research Report 75–4, University of Sussex (OR), May, 1975.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bee, A.J., The Development of a Methodology for the Study of Decision-Making in Conflicts, M.Phil thesis, University of Sussex (OR), 1976.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Milburn, T.W., The Management of Crises, in Hermann, C.F. (ed.),International Crises, Insights from Behavioural Research, The Free Press, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Emshoff, J.R., Behaviour Theory for OR Applications, Opl Res.Q., 1975, 26, 4, i, pp. 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bellman, R.E., and Zadeh, L.A., Decision Making in a Fuzzy Environment, Man. Sci. , December, 1970, 17, 4, pp. B.141-B. l64.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harris, J.I., A Preliminary Enquiry into the Relevance of Fuzzy Set Theory to Operational Research, August, 1976. (This paper is a later version of the material originally made available to Conference delegates as Annex A to the paper printed here.).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eden, C.L. and Birley, T., The Modelling of Decision-Making in Organizations: A Local Government Example, Centre for the Study of Organizational Change and Development, University of Bath, 1975.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eden, C.L. and Harris, D.J., Management Decision and Decision Analysis, The MacMillan Press, Ltd., London, 1975.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eden, C.L., An Exploration of the Role of the Analyst, Centre for the Study of Organizational Change and Development, University of Bath, 1975.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Oppenheim, A.M. and Bayley, J.C.R., Productivity and Conflict, Proceedings of the International Peace Research Association, Third General Conference, Van Gorcum and Company N.V., Assen, The Netherlands, 1970.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    White, D.J., The Nature of Decision Theory, in Reference 5 (page 6, section 4).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stockfisch, J.A., Models, Data, and War: A Critique of the Study of Conventional Forces, R-1526-PR, Rand, Santa Monica, California, March, 1975.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gregson, R.A.M., Operational Research, Psychological Information and Managerial Decision, Occupational Psychology, 1962, 36, 3, pp. 109–123.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Noor, A.E.E., Accountants-Electronic Data Processing and Management Science/Operational Research Specialists Relationships: an Empirical Investigation with Special Reference to British Industry, PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield, July, 1975.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ackoff, R.L., Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems, Wiley, New York, 1974. (Chapter 2, discussion of Interactivism).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ackoff, R.L., Does Quality of Life have to be Quantified? (international Committee on the Unity of the Sciences, London, 1974.), Opl Res.Q., 1976, 27, 2, i, pp. 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. C. Bowen
    • 1
  • J. I. Harris
    • 1
  1. 1.Ministry of DefenceUK

Personalised recommendations