Early Visual Experience in Humans: Evidence for a Critical Period in the Development of Binocular Vision

  • Richard N. Aslin
  • Martin S. Banks


Normal human perceptual systems are highly structured and capable of extremely complex functions. Yet, many persons possess structural anomalies in their perceptual systems which result in functional deficits, or specific perceptual problems. A question of great clinical and theoretical importance is how these functional deficits develop. In the pursuit of answers to this question, basic research concerning normal and abnormal perceptual development has played a major role. This chapter will provide a brief review of basic research concerning the development of binocular vision in animals and then a more complete review of a study that applied the principles uncovered in the animal studies to a population of humans with deficits in binocular vision.


Visual Cortex Critical Period Perceptual Experience Visual Experience Binocular Vision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anastasi, A. Heredity, environment, and the question “how”? Psychological Review, 1958, 65, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Awaya, S., Miyake, Y., Amaizumi, Y., Shiose, Y., Kanda, T., and Komuro, K. Amblyopia in man suggestive of stimulus deprivation amblyopia. Japanese journal of Ophthalmology, 1973, 17, 69–82.Google Scholar
  3. Aslin, R. N. Development of binocular fixation in human infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977, 23, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks, M. S., Aslin, R. N., and Letson, R. D. Sensitive period for the development of human binocular vision. Science, 1975, 190, 675–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlow, H. B., Blakemore, C., and Pettigrew, J. D. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. Journal of Physiology (London), 1967, 193, 327–342.Google Scholar
  6. Blake, R., and Hirsch, H. V. B. Deficits in binocular depth perception in cats after alternating monocular deprivation. Science, 1975, 190, 1114–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blakemore, C. Developmental factors in the formation of feature-extracting neurones. In F. O. Schmitt and E. G. Worden (Eds.), The neurosciences: Third study program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Blakemore, C. The conditions required for the maintenance of binocularity in the kitten’s visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London), 1976, 261, 423–444.Google Scholar
  9. Fiorentini, A., and Maffei, L. Spatial contrast sensitivity of myopic subjects. Vision Research, 1976, 16, 437–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freeman, R. D., Mitchell, D. E., and Millodot, M. A neural effect of partial visual deprivation in humans. Science, 1972, 175, 1384–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gottlieb, G. The roles of experience in the development of behavior and the nervous system. In G. Gottlieb (Ed.), Neural and behavioral specificity. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. Hebb, D. O. Organization of behavior. New York: Wiley, 1949.Google Scholar
  13. Hochberg, J. Nativism and empiricism in perception. In L. Postman (Ed.), Psychology in the making. New York: Knopf, 1962.Google Scholar
  14. Hohmann, A., and Creutzfeldt, O. D. Squint and the development of binocularity in humans. Nature, 1975, 254, 613–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. Journal of Physiology (London), 1959, 148, 574–591.Google Scholar
  16. Hubel, D. H., and Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London), 1962, 160, 106–154.Google Scholar
  17. Hubel, D.H., and Wiesel, T. N. Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1965, 28, 1041–1059.Google Scholar
  18. Hubel, D. H., and Wiesel, T. N. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. Journal of Physiology (London), 1970, 206, 419–436.Google Scholar
  19. Imbert, M., and Buisseret, P. Receptive field properties of visual cortical cells in kittens reared with or without visual experience. Experimental Brain Research, 1975, 22, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mitchell, D. E., and Ware, C. Interocular transfer of a visual aftereffect in normal and stereoblind humans. Journal of Physiology (London), 1974, 236, 707–721.Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell, D. E., Freeman, R. D., Millodot, M., and Haegerstrom, G. Meridional amblyopia: Evidence for modification of the human visual system by early visual experience. Vision Research, 1973, 13, 535–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Movshon, J. A., Chambers, B. E. I., and Blakemore, C. Interocular transfer in normal humans and those who lack stereopsis. Perception, 1972, 1, 483–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nikara, T., Bishop, P. O., and Pettigrew, J. D. Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of binocular single units in cat striate cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 1968, 6, 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Packwood, J., and Gordon, B. Stereopsis innormal domestic cat, Siamese cat, and cat raised with alternating monocular occlusion. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1975, 38, 1485–1499.Google Scholar
  25. Pettigrew, J. D. The effect of visual experience on the development of stimulus specificity by kitten cortical neurones. Journal of Physiology (London), 1974, 237, 49–75.Google Scholar
  26. Slater, A. M., and Findlay, J. M. Binocular fixation in the newborn baby. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1975, 20, 248–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wiesel, T. N., and Hubel, D. H. Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1965, 28, 1029–1040.Google Scholar
  28. Wiesel, T. N., and Hubel, D. H. Ordered arrangement of ocular dominance columns in monkeys lacking visual experience. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 1974, 158, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yinon, U. Age dependence of the effect of squint on cells in kittens’ visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 1976, 26, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard N. Aslin
    • 1
  • Martin S. Banks
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations