Advertisement

The Prevention of Sexual Offenses

  • John Bancroft
Part of the Perspectives in Sexuality book series (Persp. Sex.)

Abstract

Arriving at any plan of prevention that is likely to be effective requires rational appraisal. The field of sex in general and sexual offenses in particular has not been characterized by rational thinking. Often the way that the law is framed serves to reinforce and maintain our more emotional reactions to this behavior. It is thus clearly desirable that we should strive for as rational and objective an analysis of the problem as possible.

Keywords

Gender Identity Sexual Relationship Sexual Development Sexual Offense Penile Erection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bancroft, J. H. J. Deviant sexual behavior: Modification and assessment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  2. Bancroft, J. H. J. The behavioral approach to treatment of sexual problems. In J. Money & H. Musaph (Eds.), Handbook of sexology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Crawford, D. Social skills treatment programme for sexual offenders. Paper presented at the Special Hospitals Research Unit Symposium, London, May 1976.Google Scholar
  4. Evans, D. R. Subjective variables and treatment effects in aversion therapy. Behavior Research Therapy, 1970, 8, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gagnon, J., & Simon, W. Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.Google Scholar
  6. Gebhard, P. H., Gagnon, J. H., Pomeroy, W. B., & Christenson, C. V. Sex offenders: An analysis of types. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.Google Scholar
  7. Gunn, J. Sexual offenders. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, January 1976, 57-65.Google Scholar
  8. Hinton, J., O’Neill, M., & Woolbridge, J. The psychological assessment of sex offenders. Paper presented at the Special Hospitals Research Unit Symposium, London, May 1976.Google Scholar
  9. Le Vine, R. A. Gusii sex offenses: A study in social control. American Anthropologist, 1959, 61(6), 965–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McGuire, R. J, Carlisle, J. M., & Young, B. G. Sexual deviation as conditioned behavior: A hypothesis. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1965, 2, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mohr, J. W., Turner, R. E., & Jerry, M. B. Pedophilia and exhibitionism: A handbook. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  12. Money, J., & Alexander, D. Psychosexual development: Absence of homosexuality in males with precocious puberty: Review of 18 cases. Journal of Nervous Mental Diseases, 1969, 148, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ploog, D. W., & McLean, P. D. Display of penile erection in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sclureno). Animal Behavior, 1963, 11, 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ramsey, G. V. The sexual development of boys. American Journal of Psychology, 1943, 56, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rooth, F. G. Indecent exposure and exhibitionism. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 1971, 5, 521–533.Google Scholar
  16. Williams, W. The treatment of rapists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Ontario, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Bancroft
    • 1
  1. 1.MRC Reproductive Biology UnitEdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations