Possible Effects of Vasectomy on Sexual Function

  • Gordon A. Kinson
Part of the Perspectives in Sexuality book series (Persp. Sex.)


Reference to the effects of occlusion of the vas deferens was made more than 200 years ago by the English surgeon, John Hunter (1775). Some years later, Cooper (1830) experimented with dogs and compared the effects of unilateral vasoligation to occlusion of the vascular supply to the contralateral testis. He subsequently noted that, whereas the testis deprived of its blood supply became gangrenous and necrotic, the gonad subjected to blockade of its ductal outflow retained a healthy appearance. Guyon (1883), a French physician, was then soon to claim that blockade of the vas deferens led to atrophy of the prostate. This encouraged surgeons of the day to use such procedures in an effort to treat conditions involving enlarged prostate glands and diseased epididymides. The practice has continued into modern times even though it was never conclusively demonstrated that vasectomy altered prostate size in man. Only quite recently has evidence emerged to suggest that prostate function is affected after vasectomy. Renewed interest in the possible effects of vasectomy was generated by Steinach (1920) who claimed that vasoligation produced rejuvenating effects in aging men and led to hypertrophy of the interstitium and germinal atrophy of the rat testis.


Luteinizing Hormone Sexual Function Plasma Testosterone Ventral Prostate Germinal Epithelium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bishop, M.W.H. (1970). Ageing and reproduction in the male. .J. Reprod. Fert., Suppl. 12: 65–87.Google Scholar
  2. Collins, P.M., Bell, J.B.G. and Tsang, W.N. (1972). J. Endocrinol. 55 (2): XVIII-XIX.Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, A.C. (1830). In Observations on the structure and diseases of the testis. In Cooper B.B. (ed.), A Collection of the lectures of A.C. Cooper, Churchill, London, 1941.Google Scholar
  4. Easterday, J.L., Nickeil, M.D., Fahim, Z., Fahim, M.S. (1973). Effects of vasectomy on endocrine and hepatic function. Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 6 (1): 301–312.Google Scholar
  5. Guyon, F. (1883). In The History of experimental and clinical work on vasectomy. Jhaver, P.S. and Ohri, B.B. , 1960. J. Intern. Coll. Surgeons. 33 (4): 482–485.Google Scholar
  6. Hagedoorn, J. and Davis, J.E. (1974). Fine structure of the seminiferous tubules after vasectomy in man. The Physiologist, 17 (3): 236.Google Scholar
  7. Howards, S.S. and Davis, J.E. (1974). Micropuncture studies of the hydrostatic intratubular pressure in the seminiferous tubules and the tubules of the epididymis of the hamster before and after vasectomy. Program of 7th Annual Meeting of the Soc. Study Reprod. Ottawa, Canada, Aug. 19–22.Google Scholar
  8. Hunter, J. (1775). In, Vasectomy-reviewed. Hackett, R.E. and Waterhouse, K. (1973). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 116 (3): 438–455).Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, D.S. (1972). Reversible male sterilization: Current status and future directions. Contraception 5: 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnsonbaugh, R.E., O’Connell, K., Engel, S.B., Edson, M. and Sode, J. (1975). Plasma testosterone, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone after vasectomy. Fertil. Steril. 26 (4): 329–330.Google Scholar
  11. Kinson, G.A. and Layberry, R.A. (1975). Long-term endocrine responses to vasectomy in the adult rat. Contraception 11 (2): 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kinson, G.A. and Narbaitz, R. (1976a). Effects of vasectomy on testicular function in rats. J. Endocrinol. 71 (2): 100–101.Google Scholar
  13. Kinson, G.A. and Narbaitz, R. (1976b). Short-term gonadal responses in rats vasectomized at different ages. Proc. Can. Fed. Biol. Soc. 19, abs. 322.Google Scholar
  14. Kinson, G.A., Narbaitz, R. and Bruce, N. (1976). Gonadal function following vasectomy in the rat. Intern. J. Fertil. (In press).Google Scholar
  15. Kobrinsky, N.L., Winter, J.S.D., Reyes, F.I. and Faiman, C. (1976).Google Scholar
  16. Endocrine effects of vasectomy in man. Fertil. Steril. 27 (2): 152–156.Google Scholar
  17. Kothari, L.K. and Mishra, P. (1972). Vasectomy and the endocrine function of the testis. Lancet 1: 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lacy, D. and Collins, P.M. (1973). Hormones and contraception in the male and the relative merits of hormonal control and vasectomy. J. Reprod. Fert., Suppl. 18: 185–198.Google Scholar
  19. Mock, E.J., Kamel, F., Wright, W.W. and Frankel, A.I. (1975). Plasma testosterone levels in vasectomized rats. J. Reprod. Fert. 44: 575–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moore, C.R. (1932). In, Sex and Internal Secretions, 1st Edition, ed. by Allen, E: 281–371. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  21. Neaves, W.B. (1975). The androgen status of vasectomized rats. Endocrinology 96 (2): 529–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nickell, M.D., Russell, R.L., Fahim, Z. and Fahim, M.S. (1974). Long-term effect of vasectomy on reproduction and liver function. Fed. Proc. 33: 531.Google Scholar
  23. Purvis, K., Saksena, S.K., Cekan, Z. , Diczfalusy, E. and Giner, J. (1976). Endocrine effects of vasectomy. Clin. Endocrinol. 5: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosemberg, E., Marks, S.C., Howard, P.J. and James, L.P. (1974). Serum levels of follicle stimulating and luteinizing hormones before and after vasectomy in men. J. Urol. 111: 626–629.Google Scholar
  25. Sackler, A.M., Weltman, A.S., Pandhi, V. and Schwartz, R. (1973). Gonadal effects of vasectomy and vasoligation. Science 179: 293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skegg, D.C.G., Mathews, J.D., Gillebaud, J., Vessey, M.P. , Biswas, S., Ferguson, K.M., Kitchin, Y., Mansfield, M.D., and Sommerville, I.F. (1976). Hormonal assessment before and after vasectomy. Brit. Med. J. 1: 621–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, K.D., Tcholakian, R.K., Chowdhury, M. and Steinberger, E. (1976). An investigation of plasma hormone levels before and after vasectomy. Fertil. Steril. 27 (2): 145–151.Google Scholar
  28. Steinach, E. (1920). Rejuvenation by means of experimental animation of the ageing sex gland. Arch. Entrw. Mech. Org. 46: 553–618.Google Scholar
  29. Thakur, A.N., Sheth, A.R., and Rao, S.S. (1972). Biochemical studies on rat testes and sex accessory organs after vasoligation operation. Fertil. Steril. 23 (11): 834–837.Google Scholar
  30. Varma, M.M. , Varma, R.R., Johanson, A.J., Kowarski, A. and Migeon, C.J. (1975). Long-Term effects of vasectomy on pituitary-gonadal function in man. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 40: 868–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Webster, W.M. (1954). Vasectomy-how and why. N.Z. vet. J. 2: 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weiland, R.G. , Hallberg, M.C. , Zorn, E.M., Klein, D.E., and Luria, S.S. (1972). Pituitary-gonadal function before and after vasectomy. Fertil. Steril. 23 (10): 779–781.Google Scholar
  33. Whitby, M., Gordon, R.D., Seeney, N. and Thomas, M.J. (1976). Vasectomy: a long-term study of its effects on testicular endocrine function in man. Andrologia 8 (1): 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Young, W.C. (1933). Resorption of the efferent ducts of the mouse and its bearing on the ligation of the testicular-epididymal system. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. anat. 17: 729–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon A. Kinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Canada

Personalised recommendations