Stability of Planar Textures in Superfluid 3He-A

  • Pradeep Kumar


Planar textures in superfluid 3He-A are due to the symmetry breaking terms in the free energy e.g. current, magnetic field and the energy due to the nuclear dipolar interaction.1 The spin triplet — p wave order parameter is characterized in terms of two unit vectors \(\hat l\) and \(\hat d\) which respectively refer to the orbital and spin axes. The dipole energy gives two possible orientations for the d vector, one which is parallel to the \(\hat l\) vector and the other which is antiparallel to the \(\hat l\) vector. A pure d texture is the domain wall between the two confiurations in the case when \(hat l\) is uniform over the whole system. In an open system \(\hat l\) is not constrained to be uniform, the presence of a static magnetic field confines both \(\hat l\) and \(\hat d\) to a plaice perpendicular to the field. Simultaneous rotation of both \(\hat l\) and \(\hat d\) (in opposite direction) gives rise to the composite structure (see Maki’s review at this conference for details). A third structure has been postulated recently by Hall and Hook3 where the current provides 2 possible directions to the \(\hat l\) vector and in an analogous fashion the texture is the domain wall between the two configurations. Fetter4 has also studied the possible textures in the presence of currents as well as static fields.


Domain Wall Spin Diffusion Spin Triplet Planar Texture Landau Free Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    A. J. Legett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    K. Maki and H. Ebisawa, J. Low Temp. Phys. 23, 351 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    H. Hall and J. Hook (unpublished).Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    A. L. Fetter, Phys. Rev. B 14, 2801 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    K. Maki and P. Kumar, Phys. Rev. B 14, 3920 (1976);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (5a).
    A. C. Scott et al. J. App. Phys. 47, 3272 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (6).
    M. C. Cross and P. W. Anderson, Proc. of L. T. — 14 Otaniemi, Finland 1975, edited by M. Krusius and M. Vuorio (North Holland, Amsterdam 1975), Vol. 1, p. 29.Google Scholar
  8. (7).
    D. N. Paulson, M. Krusius and J. Wheatley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1322 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (8).
    K. Maki and P. Kumar (unpublished).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pradeep Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations