The Effective Interaction Between 3He Quasi-Particles on the Surface of Liquid 4He

  • D. O. Edwards
  • J. D. Feder
  • V. S. Nayak


Measurements of surface tension and of the velocity of surface sound1 have shown that less than a monolayer of 3He adsorbed on the surface of superfluid 4He behaves like a two-dimensional gas or 3He ‘quasiparticles’ with an effective mass M about 1.3 times the real mass m3. The interaction potential between the surface quasiparticles has been found to be quite weak. When interpreted in terms of an ‘effective interaction’ Vs(q), the analog of the BBP2 interaction V(q) between 3He dissolved in bulk 4He, the data give1
$$ {V^S}\left( {q = 0} \right) = + \left( {0.5 + 2.0} \right)\; \times \;{10^{ - 31}}erg\;c{m^2} $$
The sign and magnitude of Vs (q) are important because they determine whether the adsorbed 3He will become a two-dimensional BCS superfluid at a sufficiently low temperature. In this paper we use some naive theoretical arguments to augment our information about Vs(q) and the possibility of superfluidity.


Effective Interaction Schrodinger Equation Real Mass Bulk Helium Approximate Wavefunction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    D. O. Edwards, S. Y. Shen, J. R. Eckardt, P. P. Fatouros and F. M. Gasparini, Phys. Rev. B 12, 892 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    J. Bardeen, G. Baym and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. 156, 207 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    G. Baym, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 952 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    J. Lekner, Phil. Mag. 22, 669 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    e.g. W. F. Saam, Phys. Rev. A 4, 1278 (1971);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (5a).
    C. C. Chang and M. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 8, 3131 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (6).
    This formula has also been obtained independently by W. F. Saam (private communication).Google Scholar
  8. (7).
    C. Ebner and D. O. Edwards, Physics Reports 2 C, 77 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (8).
    The assumption that the He displace hemispheres is not strictly necessary, as we shall show in a more extended discussion to be submitted to Physical Review.Google Scholar
  10. (9).
    B. R. Patton and A. Zaringhalam, Physics Letters A 55, 95 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. O. Edwards
    • 1
  • J. D. Feder
    • 1
  • V. S. Nayak
    • 1
  1. 1.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations