Advertisement

NMR in Flowing Superfluid 3He in Confined Geometries

  • E. B. Flint
  • E. D. Adams
  • R. M. Mueller

Abstract

The transverse NMR of superfluid 3He A and B has been studied as a function of flow velocity in two different channel geometries. In the A phase, for the parallel plate geometry, a fraction or all of the signal was found to shift to lower frequencies with flow. In addition, the NMR signal of the flowing liquid developed a time dependent structure under certain conditions. The signal of the static liquid confined between parallel plates was found to split for a field angle of 45° relative to the plates and for temperatures near the A-B transition. None of the above effects was observed in the B phase.

Keywords

Larmor Frequency Channel Geometry Satellite Peak Cylindrical Channel Parallel Plate Geometry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    A. L. Fetter, Phys. Lett. 54A, 63 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    S. Takagi, J. Phys. C. 8, 1507 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    R. B. Kummer and E. D. Adams, to be published in J. Low Temp. Phys.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    R. M. Mueller, E. B. Flint and E. D. Adams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1460 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    The time constant for the normal fluid to come to rest was calculated to be ~ 100 msec, for the cylindrical channel and ~ 0.1 msec, for the parallel plate geometry.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    J. C. Wheately, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 415 (1975), and references cited therein.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    H. Kojima, D. N. Paulson and J. C. Wheatley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 141 (1974), andADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (7a).
    H. Kojima, D. N. Paulson and J. C. Wheatley, J. Low Temp. Phys. 21, 283 (1975);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (7b).
    A. W. Yanof and J. D. Reppy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 631 (1974);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (7c).
    T. A. Alvesalo, H. K. Collan, M. T. Loponen, O. V. Lounasmaa and M. C. Veuro, J. Low Temp. Phys. 19, 1 (1975);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (7d).
    D. D. Osheroff and L. R. Corruccini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 695 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (8).
    R. T. Johnson, R. L. Kleinburg, R. A. Webb, and J. C. Wheatley, J. Low Temp. Phys. 18, 501 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. B. Flint
    • 1
  • E. D. Adams
    • 1
  • R. M. Mueller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations