Advertisement

Computers as an Aid in Organic Synthesis Design

  • Josef Brandt
  • Josef Friedrich
  • Johann Gasteiger
  • Clemens Jochum
  • Wolfgang Schubert
  • Ivar Ugi

Abstract

Predictably, problem solving computer programs will become routine tools for the chemist in the near future. This will change the general outlook in chemistry, as well as the choice of research problems, and the approaches to their solution in a similarly profound manner, as we have experienced in the past with the advent of the modern analytical methods which include the various types of chromatography, and also the determination of chemical structures by IR, UV, NMR, ESR and mass spectroscopy, and X-ray crystallography.

Keywords

Chemical Problem Equivalent Atom Synthetic Target Chemical Distance Atomic Descriptor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. 1).
    E.J. Corey, W.T. Wipke, Science 166, 178 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2).
    I. Ugi, Rec. Chem. Progr. 30, 289 (1968)Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    H. Gelernter, N.S. Sridharan, A.J. Hart, S.C. Yen, F.W. Fowler, H.J. Shue, Topics Curr. Chem. 41, 113 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    W.T. Wipke in “Computer Representation and Manipulation of Chemical Information”, W.T. Wipke, S. Heller, R. Feldmann, E. Hyde, Edit., J. Wiley, New York, 1974Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    E.J. Corey, W.J. Howe, M.W. Orf, D.A. Pensak, G. Peterson, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 97, 6116 (1975), and preceeding papersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6).
    W.T. Wipke, M.T. Dyott, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 96, 4834 (1974), and preceeding papersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7a).
    J. Blair, J. Gasteiger, C. Gillespie, P. Gillespie, I. Ugi in “Computer Representation and Manipulation of Chemical Information”, W.T. Wipke, S. Heller, R. Feldmann, E. Hyde, Edit., J. Wiley, New York, 1974Google Scholar
  8. b).
    J. Blair, J. Gasteiger, C. Gillespie, P. Gillespie, I. Ugi, Tetrahedron 30, 1845 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. c).
    I. Ugi, J. Gasteiger, J. Brandt, J. Brunnert, W. Schubert, IBM-Nachrichten 24, 185 (1974)Google Scholar
  10. 7d).
    I. Ugi, IBM-Nachrichten, 24, 180 (1974)Google Scholar
  11. e).
    J. Brandt, J. Friedrich, J. Gasteiger, C. Jochum, W. Schubert, I. Ugi, Proceedings of the ACS Centennial Meeting, New York, April 1976 (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 8).
    A, Weise, Z. Chem. 15, 333 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 9).
    J. Dugundji, I. Ugi, Topics Curr. Chem. 39, 19 (1973)Google Scholar
  14. 10a).
    I. Ugi, P. Gillespie, Angew. Chem. 83, 980, 982 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. I. Ugi, P. Gillespie, Angew. Chem. Internat. Edit. 10, 914, 915 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. b).
    I. Ugi, P. Gillespie, C. Gillespie, N.Y. Acad. Sci. 34, 416 (1972)Google Scholar
  17. 11).
    R.V. Stevens, T. Brownscombe, priv. comm.Google Scholar
  18. 12).
    M. Randić, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 15, 105 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 13).
    R.E. Burkard, “Methoden der ganzzahligen Optimierung”, Springer-Verlag, Wien-New York (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josef Brandt
    • 1
  • Josef Friedrich
    • 1
  • Johann Gasteiger
    • 1
  • Clemens Jochum
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Schubert
    • 1
  • Ivar Ugi
    • 1
  1. 1.Organisch-Chemisches InstitutTechnischen Universität MünchenMünchen 2 Arcisstrasse 21W.-Germany

Personalised recommendations