The Analysis of Nuptiality

  • Guillaume J. Wunsch
  • Marc G. Termote


As noted in the Introduction, the analysis of nuptiality is often a prerequisite for the study of fertility. Though not a “true” demographic phenomenon, in the sense that it does not contribute directly to population change, nuptiality is, however, such an important component of natality that it deserves a separate chapter in this textbook.


Marriage Market Marriage Rate Differential Mortality Corrected Probability Intercensal Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Supplementary Bibliography

  1. Agarwala, S. N. Age at Marriage in India. Allahabad: Kitab-Mahal Private Ltd., 1962.Google Scholar
  2. Akers, D. S. On measuring the marriage squeeze. Demography, 1967, 4(2), 907–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brackel, P. O. Huwelijkskans en Partnerkeuze. Ph.D. thesis, Nijmegen, 1970,Google Scholar
  4. Carlsson, G. Marriage rates as social indicators. In The Second Scandinavian Demographic Symposium (Vol. 2). Stockholm: Scandinavian Population Studies, 1970, pp. 49–64.Google Scholar
  5. Carter, H., & Glick, P. C. Marriage and Divorce: a Social and Economic Study (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Chasteland, J. C., & Pressat, R. La nuptialité des générations françaises depuis un siècle. Population, 1962, 77(2), 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coale, A. Age patterns of marriage. Population Studies, 1971, 25(2), 193–214.Google Scholar
  8. Hajnal, J. Age at marriage and proportions marrying. Population Studies, 1953, 7(2), 111–136.Google Scholar
  9. Henry, L. Mesure de la fréquence des divorces. Population, 1952, 7(2), 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henry, L. Approximations et erreurs dans les tables de nuptialité des générations. Population, 1963, 18(4), 737–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henry, L. Nuptiality. Theoretical Population Biology, 1972, 3(2), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keyfitz, N. The mathematics of sex and marriage. In L. M. Lecam, J. Neyman, and E. L. Scott (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Vol. IV). Berkeley: Biology and Health, 1971, pp. 89–108.Google Scholar
  13. Kumar, J. Method of construction of attrition life tables for the single population based on two successive censuses. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1967, 62, 1433–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Monnier, A. L’observation rétrospective de la nuptialité des célibataires. Recherches Economiquesde Louvain, 1971, XXXVII(4), 329–364.Google Scholar
  15. Pollard, J. H. Mathematical models of marriage. Paper presented at the 4th annual conference on the Mathematics of Population, East-West Center, 1971.Google Scholar
  16. Pressat, R. Le remariage des veufs et des veuves. Population, 1956, 11(1), 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Preston, S. H. Estimating the proportion of American marriages that end in divorce. SociologicalMethods and Research, 1975, 3(4), 435–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Houte-Minet, M. Analyse Longitudinale de la Nuptialité des Célibataires et du Divorce (Vol. III). Liège: I.U.S.S.P. International Population Conference, 1969, pp. 2154–2166.Google Scholar
  19. Wattelar, C. et al. Un exemple de distorsion en analyse transversale: L’âge moyen au mariage par la méthode de Hajnal. Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 1970, 36(4), 417–426.Google Scholar
  20. Wunsch, G. L’utilisation des mariages réduits. Population et Famille, 1970, 21, 1–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillaume J. Wunsch
    • 1
  • Marc G. Termote
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Louvain (U.C.L.)Louvain-La-NeuveBelgium
  2. 2.University of QuebecMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations