Nuclear power stations now contribute a significant part of the electrical energy requirements of many countries and it is likely that this contribution will rise in the future. The successful development of a nuclear power program depends largely on the testing of candidate fuel and structural materials in a test reactor and subsequently full scale components from power reactors. After irradiation in a nuclear reactor materials become intensely radioactive and, in order to protect workers, have to be handled remotely in special enclosures. Although hazards involved in handling radioactive materials are formidable, safe remote handling techniques have been developed and operated in many laboratories around the world for over 30 years. Post-irradiation examination (PIE) of irradiated materials involves most of the techniques normally used in conventional laboratories such as radiography, non-destructive testing, chemical analysis and metallography. This paper describes recent developments in facilities and equipment used for metallographic examination of radioactive materials and gives details of the preparation techniques used. The adaption of standard electron-optical instruments for radioactive material examination is also briefly described.


Objective Changer Irradiate Material Metallographic Preparation Standard Microscope Lead Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gray, R.J., Long, E.L., Jr. and Rieht, A.E., ‘Metallography of Radioactive Materials at Oak Ridge National Laboratory’, Applications of Modern Metallographic Techniques, ASTM STP480, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp 67–96 (1970).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krautwedel, K.H., ‘A Review of Remote Optical Metallography’ Metallography, Volume 2, Numbers 2/3, pp 191–208 (September 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cain, F.M. Jr., ‘Practical Applications of Cathodic Vacuum Etching’ Metallographic Specimen PreparationOptical and Electron Microscopy, Ed. McCall and Mueller, Plenum Press, pp 107–232 (1974).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engis Ltd. Maidstone England. R.J. Swan — Private Communication.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Applied Optics, Couldsdon, Surrey, England.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown, P.E. et al, ‘Lead Shielded Micro-handling cell for Coated Fuel Particles’. Harwell Unclassified Report AERE R-6702. 1971. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greer-Spencer, J.G., ‘100 MeV Curie Alpha Beta Gamma Metallographic Suite — Engineering Design’. Harwell Unclassified Report AERE R-2549. 1961.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Evans, J.H., ‘Remote Control Microscopy’ Advances in Optical and Electron Microscopy, Volume 5, Academic Press, pp 1–42 (1973).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cochran, F.L. et al, ‘Design Criteria for In-cell Installation of Metallograph stages’ Proceedings of 19th Conference on Remote Systems Technology, American Nuclear Society, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gray, R.J. ‘The Present Status of Metallography’ Fifty Years of Progress in Metallographic Techniques, ASTM STP 430, Am. Soc. Testing Materials, pp 17–62 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bainbridge, J.E., Harwell Unclassified Report AERE R-5677, 1968.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lambert, J.D.B., Nuclear Energy, Jan, March, May 1968.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosenbaum, H.S. ‘On the Use of Electron Beams to Characterize the Microstructure of Radioactive Materials’, Metallographic Specimen Preparation. Optical and Electron Microscopy. Plenum Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. H. Evans
    • 1
  1. 1.Metallurgy DivisionAEREHarwell, OxonEngland

Personalised recommendations