Advertisement

Complex Mammalian Behavior and Pheromone Bioassay in the Field

  • Dietland Müller-Schwarze

Abstract

True field bioassays of mammalian pheromones, i.e., experiments with free-living populations, are highly desirable from a biological point of view but are practical only in rare cases. The best generally practical approach, i.e., experiments with captive animals in outdoor settings, has yielded biologically meaningful results despite many environmental factors. Eleven aspects of such bioassays are discussed. The term “Informer Pheromone” is proposed in point 9. Point 10 discusses the pathway of the tarsal odor and the supporting specialized structures. Recent results of experiments with black-tailed deer and reindeer are given in point 11. These results deal with geometric isomers, early experience with maternal odors, taxonomic specificity of an alarm pheromone, the role of ant-orbital gland secretion in age class recognition in deer, and social odors in reindeer.

Keywords

Alarm Pheromone Scent Mark Tarsal Gland Rangifer Tarandus Mule Deer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BROWNLEE, R.G., R.M. SILVERSTEIN, D. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, and A.G. SINGER. 1969. Isolation, identification and function of the chief component of the male tarsal scent in black-tailed deer. Nature 221, 284–285.Google Scholar
  2. CURTIS, R.T., BALLANTINE, J.A., KEVERNE, E.B., BONSALL, R.W., and MICHAEL, R.P. 1971. Identification of primate sexual pheromones and properties of synthetic attractants. Nature 232, 396–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DARBY, E.M., M. DEVOR, and S.L. CHOROVER. 1975. A presumptive sex pheromone in the hamster: some behavioral effects. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 88 496–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DE VOS, A. 1967. Rubbing of conifers by white-tailed deer in successive years. J. Mammal. 48, 146–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DOTY, R.L. 1975. Determination of odour preferences in rodents: a methodological review. Pp. 395–406 in: Methods in olfactory research, D.G. Moulton, A. Turk, J.W. Johnson, Jr., eds. Acad. Press.Google Scholar
  6. VON FRISCH, K. 1941. Über einen Schreckstoff der Fischhaut und seine biologische Bedeutung. Z. vergl. Physiol. 29, 46–145.Google Scholar
  7. GILBERT, B.K. 1973. Scent marking and territoriality in pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) in Yellowstone Park. Mamalia 37, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. GRAF, R. and M. MEYER-HOLZAPFEL. 1974. Die Wirkung von Harnmarken auf Artgenossen beim Haushund. Z. Tierpsychol. 35, 320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. HARRINGTON, J.E. 1976. Discrimination between individuals by scent in Lemur fulvus. Anim. Behay. 24, 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. HUMMEL, H. 1968. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Pheromone. Ph.D. Dissertation Marburg University, 122, pp.Google Scholar
  11. JOHNSTON, R.E. 1970. Scent marking olfactory communication and social behavior of the golden hamster, Mesocricetus auratus. Ph.D. dissertation. Rockefeller University, New York, N.Y. (Copyright, 1971 ).Google Scholar
  12. JOHNSTON, R.E. 1974. Sexual attraction function of golden hamster vaginal secretion. Behay. Biol. 12, 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. KLEIMAN, D.G. 1966. Scent marking in the Canidae. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 18, 167–177.Google Scholar
  14. KREBS, D.J., M.S. GAINES, B.L. KELLER, J.H. MEYERS, and R.H. TARMARIN. 1973. Population cycles in small rodents. Science 179, 35–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MERTL, A.S. 1975. Discrimination of individuals by scent in a primate. Behay. Biol. 14, 505–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MOORE, W.G. and L. MARCHINTON. 1974. Marking behavior and its function in white-tailed deer. Pp. 447–457. In: the behavior of ungulates and its relation to management. ( V. Geist and F. Walther, eds.) IUCN, Morges, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  17. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, D. 1971. Pheromones in black-tailed deer. Anim. Behay. 19, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, D. 1972. Social significance of forehead rubbing in black-tailed deer. Anim. Behay. 20, 788–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, D. and C. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE. 1972. Social scents in hand-reared pronghorn (Antilocapra americana). Zoologica Africana 7, 251–271.Google Scholar
  20. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, D., C. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, and W.L. FRANKLIN. 1973. Factors influencing scent marking in pronghorn (Antilocapra americana). Verh. Ot. Zool. Gesellsch. 66, 146–150.Google Scholar
  21. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, D., C. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, A.G. SINGER, and R.M. SILVERSTEIN. 1974. Mammalian pheromones: identification of active component in subauricular scent of pronghorn (Antilocapra americana). Science 183, 860–862.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, D., R.M. SILVERSTEIN, C. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, A.G. SINGER, and N.J. VOLKMAN. 1976. Responses to a mammalian pheromone and to its geometric isomer. J. Chem. Eco. 2, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, D., N.J. VOLKMAN and K.F. ZEMANEK. In Press. Osmetrichia: Specialized scent hairs in black-tailed deer. -J. Ultrastructure Research.Google Scholar
  24. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, D., L. KALLQUIST, and T. MOSSING. In Prep. Social behavior and olfactory communication in captive reindeer.Google Scholar
  25. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE, D. and W.B. QUAY. In Prep. The caudal gland in reindeer (Rangifertarandus).Google Scholar
  26. MYKYTOWYCZ, R., E.R. HESTERMAN, S. GAMBALE, and M.L. DUDZINSKI. 1976. A comparison of the effectiveness of the odors of rabbits, Oryctalogus cuniculus, in enhancing territorial confidence. J. Chem. Ecol. 2, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. PATTERSON, R.L.S. 1968. Identification of 3 -Hydroxy-5-androst-16-ene as the musk odour component of boar sub-maxillary salivary gland and its relationship to the sex odour taint in pork meat. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 19, 434–438.Google Scholar
  28. PETERS, R.P. and MECH, L.D. 1975. Scent marking in wolves. Amer. Sci. 63, 628–637.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. PFEIFFER, W. 1974. Pheromones in fish and amphibia. Pp. 269–637. In: “Pheromones”, M.C. Birch, ed. North Holland American Elsevier.Google Scholar
  30. ROGERS, J.G. and G. BEAUCHAMP. 1976. Influence of stimuli from populations of Peromyscus leucopus on maturation of young. J. Mammal. 57, 320–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SCHULTZE-WESTRUM, T. 1965. Innerartliche Verständigung durch Düfte beim Gleitbeutler Petaurus breviceps papuanus Thomas (Marsupialia, Phalangeridae). Z. vergl. Physiol. 50, 151–220.Google Scholar
  32. SCHUTZ, J. 1956. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Schreckreaktion bei Fischen und deren Verbreitung. Z. vergl. Physiol. 38, 84–135.Google Scholar
  33. SHOREY, H.H. 1974. Environmental and physiological control of insect sex pheromone behavior. Pp. 62–80. In: “Pheromones”, M.C. Birch, ed. North Holland American Elsevier.Google Scholar
  34. SHOREY, H.H. and L.K. GASTON. 1964. Sex pheromones of nocfuid moths. III. Inhibition of male responses to the sex pheromone in Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae). Ann. Entomiol. Soc. Am. 57, 775–779.Google Scholar
  35. SINGER, A.G., W.C. AGOSTA, R.J. O’CONNEL., C. PFAFFMAN, D.V. BOWEN, and F.H. FIELD. 1976. D. Methyl Disulfide: An attractant pheromone in hamster vaginal secretion. Science 191, 948–950.Google Scholar
  36. STEVENS, D.S. 1972. Thermal energy exchange and the maintenance of homeothermy in white-tailed deer. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University. 231 pp.Google Scholar
  37. THIESSEN, D.D., F.E. REGNIER, M. RICE, M. GOODWIN, N. ISAACKS, and N. LAWSON. 1974. Identification of a ventral scent marking pheromone in the male Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Science 184, 83–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. UEXKÜLL, J. VON, and E.G. SARRIS. 1931. Das Duftfeld des Hundes. Z. Hundeforschung 1, 55–68.Google Scholar
  39. VOLKMAN, N.J., K.F. ZEMANEK, and D. MÜLLER-SCHWARZE. In press. Antorbital and forehead secretions of black-tailed deer (Odocoileushemionuscolumbianus): their role in age class recognition. Anim. Behay.Google Scholar
  40. WILSON, E.O. and W.H. BOSSERT. 1963. Chemical communication among animals. Rec. Progr. Horm. Res. 19, 673–716.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dietland Müller-Schwarze
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Environmental Science and ForestryState University of New YorkSyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations