Physical and Cognitive Limitations on Olfactory Processing in Human Beings
Chemical communication via natural secretions is thought to play at best a minor role in the lives of human beings, but a major role in the lives of many other species. It is unlikely that the primary reason for this difference lies strictly in the realm of sensory functioning. Even if man is not the most sensitive creature on earth his sensitivity is nonetheless remarkable and undoubtedly rivals that of many other animals. Furthermore, electrophysiological evidence suggests that there is considerable similarity in olfactory reception throughout the vertebrates (Döving, 1966; Döving and Lange, 1967; Köster and MacLeod, 1975). Accordingly, the study of man’s sense of smell may teach much about olfaction in other vertebrates.
KeywordsRecognition Memory Difference Threshold Cognitive Limitation Odor Identification Odor Quality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cain, W. S. 1976. History of research on smell, in E. C. Carterette and M. P. Friedman (eds.), Handbook of Perception, Vol. 6, Tasting, Smelling, Feeling, and Hurting. Academic, New York. In press.Google Scholar
- Davis, R. G. 1975. Acquisition of verbal associations to olfactory stimuli of varying familiarity and to abstract visual stimuli. J. Exper. Psychol. 104:134–142.Google Scholar
- Döving, K. B. 1966. An electrophysiological study of odour similarities of homologous substances. J. Physiol. (London) 186:97–109.Google Scholar
- Dravnieks, A. 1975. Evaluation of human body odors: methods and interpretations. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 26:551–571.Google Scholar
- Egan, J. P. 1975. Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis. Academic, New York.Google Scholar
- Fullerton, G. S., and Cattell, J. McK. 1892. On the perception of small differences. Philos. Series, Univ. Pennsylvania 2:10–11.Google Scholar
- Green, D. M., and Swets, J. A. 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- Köster, E. P., and MacLeod, P. 1975. Psychophysical and electrophysiological experiments with binary mixtures of acetophenone and eugenol, pp. 431–444, in D. G. Moulton, A. Turk, and J. W. Johnston, Jr. (eds.), MetTiods in Olfactory Research. Academic, London.Google Scholar
- McKenzie, D. 1923. Aromatics and The Soul: A Study of Smells. Hoeber, New York.Google Scholar
- Zwaardemaker, H. 1925. L’Odorat. Doin, Paris.Google Scholar