Skip to main content

Physical and Cognitive Limitations on Olfactory Processing in Human Beings

  • Chapter
Chemical Signals in Vertebrates

Abstract

Chemical communication via natural secretions is thought to play at best a minor role in the lives of human beings, but a major role in the lives of many other species. It is unlikely that the primary reason for this difference lies strictly in the realm of sensory functioning. Even if man is not the most sensitive creature on earth his sensitivity is nonetheless remarkable and undoubtedly rivals that of many other animals. Furthermore, electrophysiological evidence suggests that there is considerable similarity in olfactory reception throughout the vertebrates (Döving, 1966; Döving and Lange, 1967; Köster and MacLeod, 1975). Accordingly, the study of man’s sense of smell may teach much about olfaction in other vertebrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brown, R., and McNeill, D. 1966. The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behay. 5:325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, W. S. 1976. History of research on smell, in E. C. Carterette and M. P. Friedman (eds.), Handbook of Perception, Vol. 6, Tasting, Smelling, Feeling, and Hurting. Academic, New York. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. G. 1973. Olfactory psychophysical parameters in man, rat, dog, and pigeon. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 85: 221–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. G. 1975. Acquisition of verbal associations to olfactory stimuli of varying familiarity and to abstract visual stimuli. J. Exper. Psychol. 104:134–142.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desor, J. A., and Beauchamp, G. K. 1974. The human capacity to transmit olfactory information. Percept. Psychophys. 16: 551–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döving, K. B. 1966. An electrophysiological study of odour similarities of homologous substances. J. Physiol. (London) 186:97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döving, K. B., and Lange, A. L. 1967. Comparative studies of sensory relatedness of odours. Scand. J. Psychol. 8:47–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dravnieks, A. 1975. Evaluation of human body odors: methods and interpretations. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 26:551–571.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J. P. 1975. Signal Detection Theory and ROC Analysis. Academic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen, T., and Pfaffmann, C. 1960. Absolute judgments of odor quality. J. Exper. Psychol. 59:214–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engen, T., and Ross, B. M. 1973. Long-term memory of odors with and without verbal descriptions. J. Exper. Psychol. 100: 221–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, G. S., and Cattell, J. McK. 1892. On the perception of small differences. Philos. Series, Univ. Pennsylvania 2:10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, E. A. McC. 1898. The applicability of Weber’s law to smell. Amer. J. Psychol. 10:82–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. M., and Swets, J. A. 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köster, E. P., and MacLeod, P. 1975. Psychophysical and electrophysiological experiments with binary mixtures of acetophenone and eugenol, pp. 431–444, in D. G. Moulton, A. Turk, and J. W. Johnston, Jr. (eds.), MetTiods in Olfactory Research. Academic, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, H. T., and Cain, W. S. 1975. Recognition memory for odors. Chem. Senses Flay. 1:331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, D. 1923. Aromatics and The Soul: A Study of Smells. Hoeber, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. 1967. Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behay. 6:156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, H. 1964. Behavioral aspects of absolute and differential olfactory sensitivity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 116:527–534.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, H. and Bosley, J. J. 1965. Olfactory discrimination and Weber’s law. Percept. Mot. Skills 20:657–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaardemaker, H. 1925. L’Odorat. Doin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaardemaker, H. 1930. An intellectual history of a physiologist with psychological aspirations, pp. 491–516, in C. Murchison (ed.), A History of Psychology in Autobiography. Clark University, Worcester, Mass.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cain, W.S. (1977). Physical and Cognitive Limitations on Olfactory Processing in Human Beings. In: Müller-Schwarze, D., Mozell, M.M. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2364-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2364-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2366-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2364-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics