Advertisement

Chemical Signals in Agonistic and Social Behavior of Rodents

  • Ph. Ropartz

Abstract

Ten years ago, a review regarding the role of chemical signals in the social behavior of rodents would have been a simple task; there were only a few works showing the involvement of olfactory cues in the social relations of mice and rats. Today, it seems impossible to compile an exhaustive list of the results of all such studies.

Keywords

Social Behavior Female Mouse Male Mouse Olfactory Bulb Chemical Signal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderson, J., and Johnston, R.E., 1975. Responses of male golden Hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) to clean and male scented areas. Behay. Biol., 15: 505–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, J., 1968. The effect of strange male odour on aggressive behavior in male mice. J. Mammal., 49: 572–575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, J., 1969. Effects of social stimuli on the adrenal cortex in male mice. Psychon. Sci., 14: 17–18.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, J., 1975. Comment on Harmatz, Boelkins and Kessler (1975): habituation not primer pheromone reduces attack in odour–exposed mice. Behay. Biol., 15: 519–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, S.A., 1958. An analysis of social behaviour in wild rats. Proc. zool. Soc. London, 130: 107–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, S.A., 1963. A study in behaviour. Methuen & Co, London.Google Scholar
  7. Beauchamp, G.K., and Beruter, J., 1973. Source and stability of attractive components in guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) urine. Behay. Biol., 9: 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beauchamp, G.K., 1974. The perineal scent gland and social dominance in the male guinea pig. Physiol. Behay., 13: 669–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beruter, J., Beauchamp, G.K., and Muetterties, E.L., 1973. Complexity of chemical communication in mammals: urinary components mediating sex discrimination by male guinea pigs. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 53: 264–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beruter, J., Beauchamp, G.K., and Muetterties, E.L., 1974. Mammalian chemical communication: perineal gland secretion of the guinea pig. Physiol. zool., 47: 130–136.Google Scholar
  11. Bowers, J.M., and Alexander, B.K., 1967. Mice: individual recognition by olfactory cues. Science, 158: 1208–1210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bronson, F.H., and Marsden, H.M., 1973. The preputial gland as an indicator of social dominance in male mice. Behay. Biol., 9: 625–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bronson, F.H., 1974. In“Pheromones;’ M.C. Birch; Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Bruce, H.M., 1960. A block to pregnancy in the mouse caused by proximity of strange males. J. Reprod. Fert., 1: 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carr, W.J., and Martorano, R.D., 1967. The response of mice to odors from trained fighters versus submissive animals. East. Psycho’. Assoc., Boston.Google Scholar
  16. Carr, W.J., Martorano, R.D., and Krames, L., 1970. Responses of mice to odors associated with stress. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 71: 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carter, C.S., and Marr, J.N., 1970. Olfactory imprinting and age variables in the guinea pig, Cavia porcellus. Animal Behay., 18: 238–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carter, C.S., 1972. Effects of olfactory experience in the behaviour of the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). Animal Behay., 20: 5460.Google Scholar
  19. Christian, J.J., 1963. Endocrine adaptive mechanisms and the physiologic regulation of population growth. In Physiological Mammalogy, edited by W.V. Mayer and R.G. van Gelder. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Christian, J.J., Llyod, J.A., and Davis, D.E., 1965. The role of endocrines in the self-regulation of mammalian populations. Recent Progr. Hormone Res., 21: 501–578.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Christian, J.J., 1968. Endocrine-behavioral negative feed-back responses to increased population density. In L’effet de groupe chez les animaux. Coll. in C.N.R.S., Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Christenson, T., Wallen, K., Brown, B.A., and Glickman, S.E. 1973. Effect of castration, blindness and anosmia on social reactivity in the male mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Physiol. Behay., 10: 989–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crowcroft, P., 1966. Mice all over. London.Google Scholar
  24. Davis, D.E., and Christian, J.J., 1957. Relation of adrenal weight to social rank of mice. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med., 94: 728–731.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis, S.F., 1970. Conspecific odors as cues for runway behavior in mice. Psychon. Sci., 19: 169–170.Google Scholar
  26. Denenberg, V.H., Hudgens, G.A., and Zarrow, M.X., 1964. Mice reared with rats: modification of behavior by early experience with another species. Science, 143: 380–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Denenberg, V.H., Rosenberg, K.M., and Zarrow, M.X., 1969. Mice reared with rats’ aunts: effects in adulthood upon plasma corticosterone and open—field activity. Physiol. Behay., 4: 705–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Desjardins, C., Maruniak, J.A., and Bronson, F.H., 1973. Social rank in house mice: differentiation revealed by ulraviolet visualization of urinary patterns. Science, 182: 939–941.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Devor, M., and Murphy, M.R., 1973. The effect of peripheral olfactory blockage on the social behavior of the male golden hamster. Behay. Biol., 9: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Didiergeorges, F., and Karli, P., 1966. Stimulations “sociales” et inhibition de l’agressivité interspécifique chez le rat privé de ses afférences olfactives. C.R. Soc. Biol., 160: 244–245.Google Scholar
  31. Dixon, A.K., and Mackintosh, J.H., 1971. Effects of female urine upon the social behaviour of adult male mice. Animal Behay., 19: 138–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dixon, A.K., and Mackintosh, J.H., 1975. The relationship between the physiological condition of female mice and the effects of their urine on the social behaviour of adult males. Animal Behay., 23: 513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dominic, C.J., 1969. Pheromonal mechanisms regulating mammalian reproduction. Gen. comp. Endocrin., 2: 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Doty, R.L., 1969. Odor preferences of female Peromyscus maniculatus bairdi for male mouse odors of P. maniculatus bairdi and P. leucopus noveboragensis as a function of estrous state. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 81: 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Doty, R.L., and Kart, R., 1972. A comparative and developmental analysis of the mid ventral sebaceous glands in 18 taxa of Peromyscus, with an examination of gonadal steroid influences in Peromyscus maniculatus bairdi. J. Mammal., 53: 83–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Edwards, D.A., 1974. Non-sensory involvement of the olfactory bulbs in the mediation of social behavior. Behay. Biol., 11: 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Edwards, D.A., Thompson, M.L., and Burge, K.G., 1972. Olfactory bulb removal vs peripherally induced anosmia: differential effects on the aggressive behavior of male mice. Behay. Biol., 7: 823–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fullerton, C., and Cowley, J.J., 1971. The differential effect of the presence of adult male and female mice on the growth and development of the young. J. Gen. Psychol., 119: 89–98.Google Scholar
  39. Gaunt, S.L.L., 1967. Classification and effect of the preputial pheromone in the mouse. Am. Zool., 7: 713.Google Scholar
  40. Grant, E.C., and Mackintosh, J.H., 1963. A comparison of the social postures of some common laboratory rodents. Behaviour, 21: 246–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hahn, M.E., and Simmel, E.C., 1968. Individual recognition by natural concentrations of olfactory cues in mice. Psychon. Sci., 12: 183–184.Google Scholar
  42. Halpin, Z.T., 1974. Individual difference in the biological odors of the mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Behay. Biol., 11: 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harmatz, P., Boelkins, R.C., and Kessler, S., 1974. Postisolation aggression and olfactory cues. Behay. Biol., 13: 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Haug, M., 1970. Mise en évidence de deux odeurs aux effets opposés de facilitation et d’inhibition des conduites agressives chez la souris mâle. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 271: 1567–1570.Google Scholar
  45. Haug, M., 1971. Rôle probable des vésicules séminales et des glandes coagulantes dans la production d’une phéromone inhibitrice du comportement agressif chez la souris. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 273: 1509–1510.Google Scholar
  46. Haug, M., 1972. Phénomènes d’agression liés â l’introduction d’une femelle étrangère vierge ou allaitante au sein d’un groupe de souris femelles. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 275: 2729–2732.Google Scholar
  47. Haug, M., 1972. Effet de l’urine d’une femelle étrangère sur le comportement agressif d’un groupe de souris femelles. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 275: 995–998.Google Scholar
  48. Haug, M., 1973. Mise en évidence d’une odeur liée â l’allaitement et stimulant l’agressivité d’un groupe de souris femelles. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 276: 3457–3460.Google Scholar
  49. Haug, M., 1973. L’urine d’une femelle allaitante contient une phéromone stimulant l’agressivité de petits groupes de souris femelles. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 277: 2053–2056.Google Scholar
  50. Hudgens, G.A., Denenberg, V.H., and Zarrow, M.X., 1968. Mice reared with rats: effects of preweaning and post–weaning social interactions upon adult behaviour. Behaviour, 30: 259–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hull, E.M., Hamilton, K.L., Engwall, D.B., and Rosselli, L., 1974. Effects of olfactory bulbectomy and peripheral deafferentation on reactions to crowding in gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 86: 247–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jeffrey, R.A., and Bennett, G.G., 1973. Olfactory cues and movement: stimuli mediating intraspecific aggression in the wild nor-way rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 85: 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Johnson, R.P., 1973. Scent marking in mammals. Animal Behay., 21: 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Johnston, R.E., 1972. Scent marking, olfactory communication and social behavior in the golden hamster, Mesocricetus auratus. Dissertation Abstr. int., 32: 10.Google Scholar
  55. Johnston, R.E., 1975. Scent marking by male golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus),I. Effects of odors and social encounters. Z. Tierpsychol., 37: 75–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jones, R.B., and Nowell, N.W., 1973. The coagulating glands as a source of aversive and aggression-inhibiting pheromone (s) in the male albino mouse. Physiol. Behay., 11: 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jones, R.B., and Nowell, N.W., 1974. A comparison of the aversive and female attractant properties of urine from dominant and subordinate male mice. Animal Learn. Behay., 2: 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kalkowski, W., 1967. Olfactory bases of social orientation in the white mouse. Folia Biol. (Prague - Warsaw), 15: 69–86.Google Scholar
  59. Kielman, B.R., and Lubow, R.E., 1974. The inhibitory effect of preexposed olfactory cues on intermale aggression in mice. Physiol. Behay., 12: 919–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. King, M.G., and Pfister, H.P., 1975. Differential preference for an activation by the odoriferous compartment of a shuttlebox in fear–conditioned and naive rats. Behay. Biol., 13: 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Krames, L., 1970. Responses of female rats to the individual body odors of male rats. Psychon. Sci., 20: 274–275.Google Scholar
  62. Krames, L., Carr, W.J., and Bergman, B., 1969. A pheromone associated with social dominance among male rats. Psychon. Sci., 16; 11–12.Google Scholar
  63. Lee, C.T., and Brake, S.C., 1971. Reactions of male fighters to male and female mice, untreated or deodorized. Psychon. Sci., 24: 209–211.Google Scholar
  64. Lee, C.T., and Griffo, W., 1972. Early androgenization and aggression pheromone in inbred mice. Am. Zool., 12: 79.Google Scholar
  65. Leon, M., 1974. Maternal pheromone. Physiol. Behay., 13: 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Leonard, C.M., 1972. Effects of neonatal (day 10) olfactory bulb lesions on social behavior of female golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 80: 208–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Louch, C.D., and Higginbotham, M., 1967. The relation between social rank and plasma corticosterone in mice. Gen. Comp. Endocrin., 8: 441–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ludvigson, H.W., and Morrison, R.R., 1970. Discrimination by rats of conspecific odors of reward and nonreward. Science, 167: 904–905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ludvigson, H.W., and Gollerain, I., 1972. Aversion of conspecific odor of frustrative nonreward in rats. Psychon. Sci., 27: 54–56.Google Scholar
  70. Mackintosh, J.H., and Grant, E.C., 1966. The effect of olfactory stimuli on the agonistic behaviour of laboratory mice. Z. Tierpsychol., 23: 584–587.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mainardi, D., Marsan, M., and Pasquali, A., 1965. Causation of sexual preferences cf the house mouse. The behaviour of mice reared by parents whose odour was artificially altered. Atti. Soc. Ital., Sc. Nat. Mus. Civ. Milano, 104: 325–338.Google Scholar
  72. Marr, J.N., and Gardner, L.E., 1965. Early olfactory experience,and later social behavior in the rat: preference, sexual responssiveness, care of young. J. Genet. Psychol., 107: 167–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Marr, J.N., and Lilliston, L.G., 1969. Social attachment in rats by odor and age. Behaviour, 33: 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Moncrieff, R.W., 1962. Mice and voles. The effect of olfaction on behavior. Am. Perfumer, 77: 52–55.Google Scholar
  75. Mugford, R.A., and Nowell, N.W., 1970. Pheromones and their effect on aggression in mice. Nature, 226: 967–968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mugford, R.A., and Nowell, N.W., 1971. The preputial glands as a source of aggression–promoting odors in mice. Physiol. Behay., 6: 247–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mugford, R.A., and Nowell, N.W., 1972. Paternal stimulation during infancy: effects upon aggression and openfield performance of mice. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 79: 30–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mugford, R.A., and Nowell, N.W., 1974. Intermale fighting affected by hnmecage odors of male and female mice. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 84: 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Müller-Velten, H., 1966. Über den Angstgeruch bei der Hausmaus (Mus musculus). Z. Physiol., 52: 401–429.Google Scholar
  80. Mykytowycz, R., and Dudzinski, M.L., 1966. A study of the weight of odoriferous and other glands in relation to social status and degree of sexual activity in the wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L.). C.S.I.R.O. Wildlife Res., 11: 31–47.Google Scholar
  81. Mykytowycz, R., 1967. Communication by smell in the wild rabbit. Proc. Ecol. Soc., 2: 125–131.Google Scholar
  82. Mykytowycz, R., 1974. Odor in the spacing behavior of Mammals. In “Pheromones”, M.C. Birch., Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  83. Porter, R.H., and Etscorn, F., 1974. Olfactory imprinting resulting from brief exposure in Acomys cahirinus. Nature, 250: 732–733.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Porter, R.H., and Etscorn, F., 1975. A primacy effect for olfactory imprinting in spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus). Behay. Biol., 15: 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ralls, K., 1971. Mammalian scent marking. Science, 171: 443–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Reynolds,E., 1971. Urination as a social response in mice. Nature, 234: 481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ropartz, Ph., 1966. Contribution â l’étude du déterminisme d’un effet de groupe chez les souris. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 262: 2070–2072.Google Scholar
  88. Ropartz, Ph., 1968. The relation between olfactory perception and aggressive behaviour in mice. Animal Behay., 16: 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ropartz, Ph., 1968. Le rôle de l’olfaction dans le comportement social des souris mâles. Rev. Comp. animal., 2: 1–39.Google Scholar
  90. Ropartz, Ph., and Haug, M., 1975. Olfaction and aggressive behaviour in female mice. In Olfaction and Taste, D.A. Denton and J.P. Coghlan; Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  91. Rottman, S.J., and Snowdon, Ch.T., 1972. Demonstration and analysis of an alarm pheromone in mice. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 81: 483–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sattler, K.M., 1972. Olfactory and auditory stress in mice. Psychon. Sci., 29: 294–296.Google Scholar
  93. Sprott, R.L., 1969. “Fear communication” via odor in inbred mice. Psychol. Rep., 25: 263–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stoddart, D.M., 1973. Preliminary characterisation of the caudal organ secretion of Apodemus flavicollis. Nature, 246: 501–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stoddart, D.M., 1974. The role of odor in the social biology of small mammals. In Pheromones, edited by M.C. Birch; Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  96. Thiessen D.D., Wallace P., and Yahr, P., 1973. Comparative studies of glandular scent marking in Meriones Tristani, an Israeli gerbil. Horm. Behay., 4: 143–147.Google Scholar
  97. Thiessen, D.D., and Regnier, F.E., 1974. Identification of a ventral scent marking pheromone in the male Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Science, 184: 83–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Valenta, J.G., and Rigby, M.K., 1968. Discrimination of the odor of stressed rats. Science, 161: 599–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wasserman, E.A., and Jensen, D.D., 1969. Olfactory stimuli and the “pseudo-extinction” effect. Science, 166: 1307–1309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wechkin, S., and Breuer, L.F., 1974. Effect of isolation on aggression in the mongolian gerbil. Psychol. Rep., 35: 415–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ph. Ropartz
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Psychophysiologie (U.L.P.)StrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations