Controlled vs. Naturalistic Experiments: Application of the Life Table Method
I would like to discuss this subject by drawing from my own experiences, which may present a familiar topic from a different vantage point. I’l1 describe research on the outpatient treatment of primary depression, in which I’ve collaborated since 1967 with Drs. Gerald Klerman and Alberto DiMascio, and Ms. Brigitte Prusoff. This research is relevant to the topic since it included a twenty-month study with both controlled and naturalistic phases. I will also draw upon my training in epidemiology, where procedures for the study of cholera or the statistical techniques used for obtaining mortality data can be useful models for psychiatric research. This discussion will illustrate that the limitations and advantages of naturalistic and controlled experiments are not that clear. Moreover, the statistical technique of life tables can be used to approximate quasiexperimental conditions for the analysis of data collected naturalistically.
KeywordsLife Table Naturalistic Experiment Naturalistic Study Life Table Method Naturalistic Phase
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barrett, J., Kuriansky, J., Gurland, B.: Community tenure following emergency discharge, American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969, 128, 945–958.Google Scholar
- Greenwood, M: The errors of sampling of the survivorship tables. Report on Public Mental Health and Medical Subjects #33, Appendix 1, H.M. Stationery Office, London, 1926.Google Scholar
- Lindemann, E.: Symptomatology and management of acute grief. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1944, 101, 141–148.Google Scholar
- Mausner, J.S., Bahn, A.K.: Epidemiology: An Introductory Text. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1974, PP. 332–335.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, D., Kety, S.S.: The Transmission of Schizophrenia. Pergamon Press, London, 1968.Google Scholar
- Weissman, M.F., Prusoff, B.A., Klerman, G.L.: Drugs and psychotherapy in depression revisited: Issues in the analysis of long-term trials. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 1975, 11, 39–41.Google Scholar