Advertisement

Prospective Studies to Investigate Behavioral Change

  • Michael Rutter

Abstract

Prospective or longitudinal studies are time consuming and expensive to undertake, they are subject to a variety of sampling hazards and the data obtained are difficult to analyze. Individuals for longitudinal study are often chosen in terms of their accessibility and cooperativeness; this fact and the sample attrition over time render many longitudinal samples biased and unrepresentative. The varying sample size at different stages during the study and the hazards of data linkage have meant that most longitudinal studies have used only cross-sectional methods of analysis. That is to say, most analyses have consisted of group associations or correlations between a variable at point B or point C, but only rarely has there been an attempt to examine individual changes in behavior over time. These and other criticisms of the longitudinal approach are fair and valid but for certain types of research questions longitudinal data are essential.

Keywords

Psychiatric Disorder Personality Disorder Predictive Validity Poor Reader Behavior Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gath, D., Cooper, B., and Gattoni, F.E.G. Preliminary communication: Child guidance and delinquency in a London borough. Psychological Medicine, 1972, 2, 185–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Graham, P., and Rutter, M. Psychiatric disorders in the young adolescent: A follow-up study. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1973, 66, 1226–1229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hare, E.H. Mental illness and social conditions in Bristol. Journal of Mental Science, 1956, 102, 349–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, M., Bane, M.J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., and Michelson, S. Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. London: Allen Lane, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. Power, M.J., Benn, R.T., and Morris, J.N. Neighbourhood, school and juveniles before the courts. British Journal of Criminology, 1972, 12, 111–132.Google Scholar
  6. Quinton, D., Rutter, M., and Rowlands, O. An evaluation of an interview assessment of marriage. Psychological Medicine, 1976, 6, in press.Google Scholar
  7. Robins, L.N., and Hill, S.Y. Assessing the contribution of family structure, class and peer groups to juvenile delinquency. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Political Science, 1966, 57, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rutter, M. A children’s behaviour questionnaire for completion by teachers: Preliminary findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1967, 8, 1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rutter, M. Why are London children so disturbed? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1973, 66, 1221–1225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rutter, M., Cox, A., Tupling, C., Berger, M., and Yule, W. Attainment and adjustment in two geographical areas: I. The prevalence of psychiatric disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1975, 126, 493–509.Google Scholar
  11. Rutter, M., Graham, P., Chadwick, O., and Yule, W. Adolescent turmoil: Fact or fiction? Development of Medicine in Child Neurology, 1976, 1, 35–56.Google Scholar
  12. Rutter, M., Tizard, J., and Whitmore, K. (Eds.), Education, health and behaviour. London: Longmans, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. Shepherd, M., Oppenheim, B., and Mitchell, S. Children’s behaviour and mental health. London: University of London Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. Wall, W.D., and Williams, H.L. Longidutinal studies and the social sciences. London: Heinemann, 1970.Google Scholar
  15. West, D.J., and Farrington, D.P. Who becomes delinquent? Second report of the Cambridge study in delinquent development . London: Heinemann Educational, 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Rutter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryInstitute of PsychiatryLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations