Rational and Intuitive Frames of Reference

  • Liam Hudson


I want to talk about evidence; especially about the kind of psychological evidence that relates the emotional organisation of the individual to those aspects of intellectual performance that we refer to by means of phrases like ‘disposition’, ‘frame of mind’ or ‘frame of reference’. And while I shall use two pieces of American evidence to stake out this territory in a general way, I shall then go on to concentrate on four pieces of work carried out in the Research Unit on Intellectual Development, and in which I have had a more direct hand. In describing these, I will of course be trying to persuade you that ‘frames of mind’ or ‘frames of reference’ are aspects of intellectual functioning that can be explored in an orderly way. But I also have a more surreptitious motive, because I want to say something, too, about the nature of psychological inquiry; about the kind of evidence that this throws up; and about the sorts of interpretative challenge that this evidence forces upon us. At this surreptitious level, my thesis will be that the interpretative task of the psychologist has two facets, one of which we are alert to and the other of which we have neglected.


Violent Response Freudian Theory Interpretative Challenge Intellectual Disposition Evidence Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AUSTIN, M. Dream Recall and the Bias of Intellectual Ability, Nature, 1971, 231, p. 59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BRONFENBRENNER, U. Two Worlds of Childhood, Russell Sage Foundation, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. CARLSMITH, L. Effect of Early Father-Absence on Scholastic Aptitude, Harvard Educational Review, 1964, 34, p. 3Google Scholar
  4. HOLMES, M.A.M. REM Sleep Patterning and Dream Recall in Convergers and Divergers, Occasional Paper 16, C.R.E.S., Edinburgh University, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. HUDSON, L. Contrary Imaginations, Methuen and Penguin, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. HUDSON, L. Frames of Mind, Methuen and Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar
  7. HUDSON, L. and JACOT, B. Marriage and Fertility in Academic Life, Nature, 1971, 229, p. 531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. HUDSON, L. and JACOT, B. Education and Eminence in British Medicine, British Medical Journal, 1971, 4, p. 162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. HUDSON, L. Human Beings, Cape and Doubleday, 1975.Google Scholar
  10. MOLINARI, S. and FOULKES, D. TONIC and Phasic Events during Sleep, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 29, p. 343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. PRIBRAM, K. and GILL, M. Freud’s ‘Project’ Reassessed, Hutchinson, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. SULLOWAY, F. The Role of Cognitive Flexibility in Science, unpublished paper, Dept. of History of Science, Harvard, 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liam Hudson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations