Alcoholism and Drug Dependence — A Multidisciplinary Problem: The Sociologist’s Viewpoint

  • David Robinson


Whenever alcoholism or drug-dependence are being discussed it can confidently be expected that someone will call them “multidisciplinary” problems. David Pittman (1967), for example, speaks of: “....a multidisciplinary problem which involves researchers and practitioners from the biological and natural sciences, the psychological sciences and the social sciences”, while Catanzaro (1968) casts his net even wider: “Professionals from a wide variety of disciplines must be involved” he says, “including physicians, social workers, psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, clergymen, vocational rehabilitation counsellors, lay counsellors, judges, educators, sociologists and many others”. Significantly, perhaps, sociologists come immediately before the unspecified “many others” at the end of Catanzaro’s list. Significantly, because people who write about alcoholism and drug dependence often include sociologists in their list of people who might be “involved” and yet rarely give any indication of what sociologists actually do, or why what they do might be of interest, much less of use.


Drug Dependence American Hospital Association Disease Concept Sociological Work Multidisciplinary Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bacon, S. (1969). introduction to Cahalen, D., Cisin, I. and Crossley, M. American Drinking Practices: a National Study of Drinking Behaviour and Attitudes, Rutgers Centre of Alcohol Studies, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  2. Bales, R.F. (1959). “Cultural Differences in Ideas of Alcoholism”, Drinking and Intoxication, McCarthy, R.G. (ed) Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Burroughs, W.S. (1961). Points of Distinction between Sedative and Mind-expanding Drugs”. Paper to American Psychological Symposium.Google Scholar
  4. Beattie, R.T. (1968). “Nutmeg as a Psycho-active Agent”. British Journal of Addiction, 63. 105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catanzaro, R.J. (1968). Alcoholism: the Total Treatment Approach, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
  6. Cavan, S. (1966). Liquor License: an Ethnography of Bar Behaviour, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, D. (1969). The Drug Dilemma, McGraw-Hill Inc. New York. CONCISE OXFORD DICTIONARY.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, D.L. (1974). “Is Alcoholism Really a Disease?” Contenrporary Drug Problems.Google Scholar
  9. DeQuincey, T. (1932), Confessions of an English Opium Eater, Three Sirens Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, G. (1971). Unreason is an Age of Reason, The Edwin Stevens Lectures.Google Scholar
  11. Edwards, G. (1970). “The Status of Alcoholism as a Disease”. Modern Trends in Drug Dependence and Alcoholism, Phillipson, R.V. (ed) Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Field, P.B. (1962). “A New Cross-cultural Study of Drunkenness”. Society, Culture and Drinking Patterns, Pittman, D.J. and Snyder, C.R. (eds), Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Garmondsway, G.N. (1965). The Penguin English Dictionary, Penguin, Hammondsworth, Middlesex.Google Scholar
  14. Gitlow, S.E. (1973). “Alcoholism a Disease”. Alcoholism: Progress in Research and Treatment, Bourne, P.G. and Fox, R. (eds), Academic Press Inc. New York.Google Scholar
  15. Glatt, M.M. (1968). “Recent Patterns of Abuse of and Dependence on Drugs”. British Journal of Addiction, 63, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horton, D. (1943). “The Functions of Alcohol in Primitive Societies” Quarterly Journal Studies on Alcohol, 4, 199.Google Scholar
  17. James, W. (1969). “Varieties of Religious Experience”. The Marijuana Papers, Soloman, D. (ed) Panther Books, London.Google Scholar
  18. Jellinek, E.M. (1960). The Disease Concept of Alcoholism, Hillhouse Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  19. Maddox, G.L. and McCall, B.C. (1964). Drinking Among Teenagers, Rutgers Centre of Alcohol Studies, New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  20. Maxwell, R. (1969). Cited in notice about a fund for a film on drug addiction. British Journal of Addiction, 64, 149–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moser, J. (1974) Problems and Programmes Related to Alcohol and Drug Dependence in 55 Countries, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Offset Publication No. 6.Google Scholar
  22. Pattison, E.M. (1969). “Comment on the Alcoholic Game”. Quarterly Journal Studies on Alcohol, 30, 953–956.Google Scholar
  23. Pittman, D.J. (1967) Alcoholism, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, D. (1976), From Drinking to Alcoholism: A Sociological Commentary, Chapter 4, Alcoholism and Disease, Wiley and Sons, London.Google Scholar
  25. Roebuck, J.B. and Kessler, R.L. (1972). The Etiology of Alcoholism: Constitutional, Psychological and Sociological Approaches, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
  26. Room, R. (1972). “The Alcohologist’s Addiction: Some Implications of Losing Control over the Disease Concept of Alcoholism”. Quarterly Journal Studies on Alcohol, 33.4.72.Google Scholar
  27. Snyder, C.R. (1958). Alcohol and the Jews, Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.Google Scholar
  28. Young, J. (1971). The Drug takers: the Social Meaning of Drug use, MacGibbon & Kee, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Robinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Addiction Research Unit, Institute of PsychiatryUniversity of LondonUK

Personalised recommendations