Skip to main content

Social Circumstances of Non-Convicted vs Convicted Drug Users

  • Chapter

Abstract

This paper deals with the criminal behaviour of a group of young drug users in the geographical area of Southern Hampshire, England. It is based upon data obtained in intensive personal interviews of a non-representative sample of one hundred and twenty-two drug users. It thus differs from most previous studies which have dealt mainly with the institutionalized drug users. Although studies on institutionalized users reveal a great deal about patterns of criminal behaviour associated with drug use, they reveal very little about what happens before and after the individual’s institutionalization, and almost nothing at all about the individual’s use of drugs and non-reported criminal behaviour, and the events that led to the cmiminal behaviour being brought to the attention of the various statutory bodies. Equally important, research conducted in institutions contains little or no information about many of the attitudes, values and other characteristics of a drug taking group with which this study is concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ball, J.C. (1967). “Reliability and Validity of Data Obtained from 59 Narcotic Drug Addicts”. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 650–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chief Constable’s Report (1972, 1975). Hampshire, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohrenwend, B.S. et al. (1968). “Social Distance and Interviewer Effects”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32, 410–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, R. (1950). “Roles in Sociological Field Observations”, Social Forces, 36, 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, B. (1973). The Use of Social Statistics in Sociology, The MacMillen Co. U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M.H. (1962). “The Interviewer and the Professional Relationship”. In Rose, A.M. (ed.) Human Behaviour and Social Process, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsky, N. (1971). Hustlers, Beats and Others, London, Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, C.E. (1972). “Motivation for Changing Methods of Drug Taking”. Proceedings I.A.A. Conference, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D. (1969). Present Conduct and Future Delinquency, International Universe Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reeves, C.E. (1977). Social Circumstances of Non-Convicted vs Convicted Drug Users. In: Madden, J.S., Walker, R., Kenyon, W.H. (eds) Alcoholism and Drug Dependence. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2337-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2337-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2339-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2337-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics