Advertisement

Current Licking: Lick-Contingent Electrical Stimulation of the Tongue

  • Jan A. W. M. Weijnen

Abstract

Accidental discoveries can lead to extensive research programs. Two lines or research into the reinforcing properties of oral sensory stimulation have resulted directly from such serendipitous observations: the study of airlicking (Hendry and Rasche, 1961) and of current-licking behavior (Slangen and Weijnen, 1972).

Keywords

Electrical Stimulation Test Chamber Current Intensity Water Deprivation Grid Floor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beidler, L. M., 1970, Physiological properties of mammalian taste receptors, in “Taste and Smell in Vertebrates” (G. E. W. Wolstenholme and J. Knight, eds.), Churchill, London, pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
  2. Blom, S., 1960, Afferent influences on tongue muscle activity: A morphological and physiological study in the cat, Acta Physiol. Scand., Suppl. 170:1–97.Google Scholar
  3. Blom, S., and Skoglund, S., 1959, Some observations on the control of the tongue muscles, Experientia (Basel) 15:12–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolles, R. C., 1975, “Theory of Motivation” (2nd ed.), Harper and Row, New York, Chapter 13.Google Scholar
  5. Braud, W. G., and Prytula, R. E., 1969, Licking suppression and recovery as functions of contingency, locus, and frequency of punishment, Psychon. Sci. 14:16–18.Google Scholar
  6. Bujas, Z., 1971, Electrical taste, in “Handbook of Sensory Physiology (Vol. IV, Chemical senses, 2) (L. M. Beidler, ed.), Springer, Berlin, pp. 180–199.Google Scholar
  7. Bujas, Z., Rohaček, A., and Kovačić, M., 1975, Electrode area and electrical taste thresholds, Acta Inst. Psychol. Univ. Zagrab 76:25–29.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, B. A., and Masterson, F. A., 1969, Psychophysics of punishment, in “Punishment and Aversive Behavior” (B. A. Campbell and R. M. Church, eds.), Appleton-Century-Crofts, Meredith Corporation, New York, pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, H. J., 1968, Peripheral self-stimulation as a reward, Nature 218:104–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, H. J., 1972, Peripheral self-stimulation as a reward in fish, reptile and mammal, Physiol. Behav. 8:637–640.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faull, J. R., and Halpern, B. P., 1972, Taste stimuli: Time course of peripheral nerve response and theoretical models, Science 178:73–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glow, P. H., and Russell, A., 1975, The effects of a dexamphetamine-amylobarbitone sodium mixture on the reward value of different sensory changes, Psychopharmacologia (Berlin) 41:181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halpern, B. P., 1973, The use of vertebrate laboratory animals in research on taste, in “Methods of animal experimentation (Vol. IV, Environment and the Special Senses)” (W. I. Gay, ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 225–362.Google Scholar
  14. Harrington, G. M., and Linder, W. K., 1962, A positive reinforcing effect of electrical stimulation,J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 55:1014–1015.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hearst, E., and Jenkins, H. M., 1974, “Sign-Tracking: The Stimulus-Reinforcer Relation and Directed Action,” Psychonomic Society, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  16. Hellekant, G., and Hagstrom, E. C., 1974, Efferent chorda tympani activity and salivary secretion in the rat, Acta Physiol. Scand. 90:533–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hellekant, G., and Kasahara, Y., 1973a, The linguo-chorda tympani reflex—An electrophysiologically undescribed reflex, Acta Physiol. Scand. 87:199–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hellekant, G., and Kasahara, Y., 1973b, Secretory fibres in the trigeminal part of the lingual nerve to the mandibular salivary gland of the rat, Acta Physiol. Scand. 89:198–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hendry, D. P., and Rasche, R. H., 1961, Analysis of a new nonnutritive positive reinforcer based on thirst,J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 54:477–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kawamura, Y., Okamoto, J., and Funakoshi, M., 1968, A role of oral afferents in aversion to taste solutions, Physiol. Behav. 3:537–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelleher, R. T., and Gollub, L. R., 1962, A review of positive conditioned reinforcement, J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 5:543–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King, N. W., Justesen, D. R., and Simpson, A. D., 1970, The photo-lickerandum: A device for detecting the licking response, with capability for near-instantaneous programming of variable quantum reinforcement, Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. 2:125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kissileff, H. R., 1969, Food-associated drinking in the rat, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 67:284–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martonyi, B., and Valenstein, E. S., 1971, On drinkometers: Problems and an inexpensive photocell solution, Physiol. Behav. 7:913–914.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mendelson, J., Zec, R., and Chillag, D., 1972, Effects of desalivation on drinking and air licking induced by water deprivation and hypertonic saline injections, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 80:30–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nachman, M., 1970, Learned taste and temperature aversions due to lithium chloride sickness after temporal delays, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 73:22–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pfaffmann, C., 1952, Taste preference and aversion following lingual denervation, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 45:393–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pfaffmann, C., Fisher, G. L., and Frank, M. K., 1967, The sensory and behavioral factors in taste preferences, in “Olfaction and Taste,” II (T. Hayashi, ed.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 361–379.Google Scholar
  29. Plattig, K.-H., 1969, Über den elektrischen Geschmack. Z. Biol. 116:161–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Plattig, K.-H., 1971, Taste sensations and evoked brain potentials after electric stimulations of tongue in man, in “Gustation and Olfaction” (G. Ohloff and A. F. Thomas, eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 73–86.Google Scholar
  31. Revuski, S., and Garcia, J., 1970, Learned associations over long delays, in “The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory,” IV (C. H. Bower and J. T. Spence, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–84.Google Scholar
  32. Rozin, P., and Kalat, J. W., 1971, Specific hungers and poison avoidance as adaptive specializations of learning, Psychol. Rev. 78:459–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schneyer, C. A., and Schneyer, L. H., 1959, Electrolyte levels of rat salivary secretions, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 101:568–569.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegel, S., 1956, “Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences,” McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Slangen, J. L., and Weijnen, J. A. W. M., 1972, The reinforcing effect of electrical stimulation of the tongue in thirsty rats, Physiol. Behav. 8:565–568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, D. V., and Bealer, S. L., 1975, Sensitivity of the rat gustatory system to the rate of stimulus onset, Physiol. Behav. 15:303–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tapp, J. T., and Long, C. J., 1968, A comparison of the reinforcing properties of stimulus onset for several sense modalities, Can. J. Psychol. 22:449–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tapp, J. T., Mathewson, D. M., and Simpson, L. L., 1968, Effects of hunger and thirst on reinforcing properties of light onset and light offset,J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 66:784–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. von Békésy, G., 1964, Sweetness produced electrically on the tongue and its relation to taste theories,J. Appl. Physiol. 19:1105–1113.Google Scholar
  40. Weijnen, J. A. W. M., 1972, Lick-contingent electrical stimulation of the tongue: Its reinforcing properties in rats under dipsogenic conditions, doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht (University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Mich., Order No. 76–6040).Google Scholar
  41. Weijnen, J. A. W. M., 1975, Orale sensorische stimulatie bij de rat: Effecten op lik- en drinkgedrag, Gedrag, Tijdschr. Psychol. (Nijmegen), 3:314–326.Google Scholar
  42. Wise, R. A., Yokel, R. A., and de Wit, H., 1976, Both positive reinforcement and conditioned aversion from amphetamine and from apomorphine in rats, Science 191:1273–1274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yamamoto, T., 1975, Linguo-hypoglossal reflex: Effects of mechanical, thermal and taste stimuli, Brain Res. 92, 499–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan A. W. M. Weijnen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Physiological Psychology SectionTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations