Advertisement

Pain pp 171-194 | Cite as

The Development of a Pain Perception Profile: A Psychophysical Approach

  • Bernard Tursky

Abstract

Recently I visited the laboratory of a prominent neurologist who is involved in highly sophisticated nerve conduction research. He also maintains a private practice and is much sought after as a specialist and consultant. We talked about his research and he proudly described to me in great detail the complexities of his laboratory equipment, which had the appearance of a miniature space program launch facility. He was very articulate about his ability to manipulate all the physical and experimental variables in his research and took pains to explain how carefully he measured and controlled noise in his recording system. Our conversation finally shifted to my interests and I described some of my ideas about the need for developing methods to evaluate the individual patient’s perception of pain. I asked him how he made such evaluations in his medical practice and what special instruments he used for this purpose. His answer was to reach into his pocket and solemnly produce a large safety pin which he identified, with almost the same amount of pride as he had expressed for his complex laboratory instruments, as his major test instrument in evaluating his patients’ pain sensitivity. I do not have any objection to my friend’s use of the safety pin but, if he is going to use it as a clinical test instrument, I, as a concerned scientist, want to know how the instrument is calibrated. That is, how sharp is the pin and how much force is used to prick the patient.

Keywords

Sound Pressure Magnitude Estimation Tactile Stimulation Category Scale Regression Bias 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beecher, H.K. Measurement of subjective responses: quantitative effects of drugs. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, J.W. & Bindra, D. Individual differences in pain threshold. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1956, 10, 69–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, W.C. Sensory-decision theory analysis of the placebo effect on the criterion pain and thermal sensitivity (d’). Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969, 74, 363–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, W.C. & Dillon, D.J. SDT analysis of binary decisions and sensory intensity ratings to noxious thermal stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 491–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, W.C. & Mehl, L. Thermal pain: a sensory decision theory analysis of the effect of age and sex on d’, various response criteria, and 50% pain threshold. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971, 78, 202–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, W.C. & Yang, J.C. Acupunctural analgesia? Evaluation by signal detection theory. Science, 1974, 184, 1096–1098.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cross, D.V. Some technical notes on psychophysical scaling. In H. Moskowitz, B. Scharf & J. C. Stevens (Eds.), Sensation and measurement: paper in honor of S. S. Stevens. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1974, 23–26.Google Scholar
  8. Cross, D.V., Tursky, B. & Lodge, M. The role of regression and range effects in determination of the power function for electric shock. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 18, 9–14.Google Scholar
  9. Dawson, W.E. & Brinker, R.P. Validation of ratio scales of opinion by multimodality matching. Perception and Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fordyce, W.E. Behavioral methods for chronic pain and illness. Saint Louis: C. V. Mosby Co., 1976.Google Scholar
  11. Forgione, A.G. & Barber, T.X. A strain gauge pain stimulator. Psychophysiology, 1971, 8, 102–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frankenhaeuser, M., Mellis, I. & Froeberg, J. Effect of electrical stimulation on sensation threshold. Perceptual and Motors Skills, 1967, 24, 271–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, D.M. & Swets, J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1966.Google Scholar
  14. Hardy, D.J., Wolff, H.G., & Goodell, H. Pain sensations and reactions. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1952.Google Scholar
  15. Higgins, J.D., Tursky, B. & Schwartz, G.E. Shock elicited pain and its reduction by concurrent tactile stimulation. Science, 1971, 172, 866–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill, H.E., Flanary, H.G., Kornetsky, C.H. & Wikler, A. Relationship of electrically induced pain to the amperage and the wattage of shock stimuli. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1952, 31, 261–266.Google Scholar
  17. Licklider, J.D.R. Basic correlates of the auditory stimulus. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental psychology. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1951, 985–1039.Google Scholar
  18. Lodge, M., Cross, D., Tursky, B. & Tanenhaus, J. The psychophysical scaling and validation of a political support scale. American Journal of Political Science, 1975, 19, 611–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Melzack, R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain, 1, 277–299.Google Scholar
  20. Melzack, R. & Torgerson, W.S. On the language of pain. Anesthesiology, 1971, 34, 50–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nichols, D.C. & Tursky, B. Body image, anxiety, and tolerance for experimental pain. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1967, 29, 103–110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Price, K.P. & Tursky, B. The effect of varying stimulus parameters on judgments of nociceptive electrical stimulation. Psychophysiology, 1975, 12, 663–666.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith, G.M., Lowenstein, D. & Beecher, H.K. Experimental pain produced by the submaximum effort tourniquet technique: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 1968, 163, 468–474.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sternbach, R.A. Pain: a psychophysiological analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  25. Sternbach, R.A., Murphy, R.W., Timmermans, G., Greenhoot, J.H. & Akeson, W. Measuring the severity of clinical pain. Advances in Neurology, 1974, 4, 281–288.Google Scholar
  26. Sternbach, R.A. & Tursky, B. On the psychophysical power function in electric shock. Psychonomic Science, 1964, 1, 217–218.Google Scholar
  27. Sternbach, R.A. & Tursky, B. Ethnic differences among housewives in psychophysical skin potential responses to electric shock. Psychophysiology, 1965, 1, 241–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stevens, J.C. & Mack, J.D. Scales of apparent force. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959, 58, 405–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stevens, J.C. & Marks, L.E. Spatial summation and the dynamics of warmth sensation. Perception and Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stevens, J.C. & Stevens, S.S. Warmth and cold: dynamics of sensory intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 60, 183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stevens, S.S. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 153–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stevens, S.S. To honor Fechner and repeal his law. Science, 1961, 133, 80–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stevens, S.S. Psychophysics: introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: John Wiley & Son, 1975.Google Scholar
  34. Stevens, S.S., Carton, A.S. & Shickman, G.M. A scale of apparent intensity of electric shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 56, 328–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stevens, S.S. & Greenbaum, H.B. Regression effect in psychophysical judgment. Perception and Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 439–446.Google Scholar
  36. Tursky, B. Physical, physiological, and psychological factors that affect pain reaction to electric shock. Psychophysiology, 1974, 11, 95–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tursky, B., Greenblatt, D.J. & O’Connell, D. Electrocutaneous threshold changes produced by electric shock. Psychophysiology, 1971, 7, 490–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tursky, B. & O’Connell, D. Reliability and interjudgment predictability of subjective judgments of electrocutaneous stimulation. Psychophysiology, 1972, 9, 290–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard Tursky
    • 1
  1. 1.New York State University at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations