Mental Health Consultation for School Administrators

  • Irving H. Berkovitz
Part of the Current Topics in Mental Health book series (CTMH)


Though the classroom teacher exercises the most direct impact on the child, he lives in a network subject to influence and pressures from many sources including the principal, the vice-principal, the assistant superintendent, the school counselor, the school board, the maintenance crew, the teachers’ union, parents, students, and others. Therefore, to offer mental health consultation only to the teacher group may be incomplete, at best, and at times, unknowingly, may increase conflict between teacher and administrator. For example, a consultant who advocates a nonpunitive attempt to understand children’s behavior problems, may contradict an administrator’s previous policy.5


Mental Health School District Board Member School Board School Personnel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Altrocchi, J., Spielberger, C. D., and Eisdorfer, C. Mental health consultation with groups. Community Mental Health Journal, 1965, 1, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berkovitz, I. H. Mental health consultation to school personnel: Attitudes of school administrators and consultant priorities. The Journal of School Health, 1970, 40, 348–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berkovitz, I. H. and Thomson, M. Mental health consultation and assistance to school personnel of Los Angeles County. Office of Los Angeles County, Superintendent of Schools, Downey, California, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berlin, I. N. Some learning experiences as psychiatric consultant in the schools. Mental Hygiene, 1956, 40, 215–236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berlin, I. N. School child guidance services, retrospect and prospect. Psychology in the Schools, 1966, 3, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caplan, G. Principles of preventive psychiatry. New York: Basic Books, 1964, Chapter 9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caplan, G. The theory and practice of mental health consultation. New York: Basic Books, 1969, Chapter 10.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cutler, R. L., and McNeil, E. B. Mental health consultation in schools: A research analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1966.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goodhart, G. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    London, N. J., and Perlswig, E. Urban principalship in crisis (unpublished ), 1967.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mannino, F. V., and Shore, M. F. The effects of consultation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1975, 3 (1), 1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ruben, A. G. Humanizing school principals. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 1972.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sarchet, J. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shearer, M. The principal is often overlooked. Community Mental Health Journal, 1968, 4, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, P. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomson, M. Personal communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irving H. Berkovitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mental Health ServicesLos Angeles CountyUSA

Personalised recommendations