Prenatal Human Development

  • Ronan O’Rahilly

Abstract

The prenatal development of the human uterus will be presented here primarily from the viewpoint of morphology. It should be needless to stress, however, that other considerations—from the fields of biochemistry and endocrinology, for example—are also necessary for a proper understanding of uterine development. Moreover, a developmental account of the uterus necessitates that attention be given to the urinary system, because “the urinary and reproductive organs… form an inseparable whole in the adult organism” (Felix, 1912) as they do also in the embryo and fetus.

Keywords

Entropion Migration Depression Estrogen Adenocarcinoma 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agogué, M., 1965, Dualité embryologique du vagin humain et origine histologique de sa muqueuse. Gynécol. Obstét. 64: 407–414.Google Scholar
  2. Beltermann, R., 1965, Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen am Epoophoron des Menschen, Arch. Gynaekol. 200: 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouton, C., and Maillet, M., 1971, Contribution à l’étude de l’organogénèse utérine chez le foetus humain, C. R. Assoc. Anat. 56: 261–275.Google Scholar
  4. Bowdler, J. D., Dey, D. L., and Smith, P. G., 1971, Embryological implications of the male vagina, J. Anat. 110: 510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bulmer, D., 1957, The development of the human vagina, J. Anat. 91: 490–509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Candreviotis, N., 1967, Die spezifische Differenzierung des Mesenchym in den Anlagen der Genitalorgane des Menschen, insbesondere des Müllerschen Ganges bei der Frau und ihre Beziehung zur Histogenese der Endometriose, gegründet auf embryologisch-histologische Untersuchungen, Zentralbl. Gynaekol. 89: 369–382.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, H. R., 1911, A contribution to the origin of uterine muscle in relation to blood-vessels, J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Emp. 20: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunha, G. R., 1975, The dual origin of vaginal epithelium, Am. J. Anat. 143: 387–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danforth, D. N., 1947, The fibrous nature of the human cervix, and its relation to the isthmic segment in gravid and nongravid uteri, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 53: 541–560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies, J., and Kusama, H., 1962, Developmental aspects of the human cervix, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sei. 97: 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Didier, E., 1968, Données expérimentales sur la formation du canal de müller chez l’embryon d’oiseau, Ann. Embryol. Morphog. 1: 341–350.Google Scholar
  12. Didier, E., 1973a, Recherches sur la morphogénèse du canal de Müller chez les oiseaux. I. Étude descriptive, W. Roux Arch. Entwickl. Mech. Org. 172: 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Didier, E., 19736, Recherches sur la morphogénèse du canal de Müller chez les oiseaux. II. Étude expérimentale, W. Roux Arch. Entwickl. Mech. Org. 172: 287–302.Google Scholar
  14. Duthie, G. M., 1925, An investigation of the occurrence, distribution and histological structure of the embryonic remains in the human broad ligament, J. Anat. 59: 410–431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Eida, T., 1961, Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien über der Verschiebung der Epithelgrenze an der Portio vaginalis cervicis, Yokohama Med. Bull. Suppl. 12: 54–63.Google Scholar
  16. Faulconer, R. J., 1951, Observations on the origin of the Müllerian groove in human embryos, Contrib. Embryol. Carneg. Inst. 34: 159–164.Google Scholar
  17. Felix, W., 1912, The development of the urinogenital organs, in: Manual of Human Embryology (F. Keibel and F. P. Mall, eds.), pp. 752–979, Vol. 2, Lippincott, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  18. Fluhmann, C. F., 1960, The developmental anatomy of the cervix uteri, Obstet. Gynecol. 15: 62–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Forsberg, J.G., 1963, Derivation and differentiation of the vaginal epithelium, Institute of Anatomy, Lund.Google Scholar
  20. Forsberg, J.G., 1965, Origin of vaginal epithelium, Obstet. Gynecol. 25: 787–791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Forsberg, J.G., 1973, Cervicovaginal epithelium: Its origin and development, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 115: 1025–1043.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Frutiger, P., 1969, Zur Frühentwicklung der Ductus paramesonephrici und des Müllerschen Hügels beim Menschen, Acta Anat. 72: 233–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gardner, G. H., Greene, R. R., and Peckham, B. M., 1948, Normal and cystic structures of the broad ligament, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 55: 917–939.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Glenister, T. W., 1962, The development of the utricle and of the so-called middle or median lobe of the human prostate, Anat. 96: 443–455.Google Scholar
  25. Gruenwald, P., 1941, The relation of the growing müllerian duct to the wolffian duct and its importance for the genesis of malformations, Anat. Ree. 81: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gruenwald, P., 1942, Primary asymmetry of the growing müllerian ducts in the chick embryo, Morphol. 71: 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gruenwald, P., 1959, Growth and development of the uterus: The relationship of epithelium to mesenchyme, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sei. 75: 436–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamperl, H., and Kaufmann, C., 1959, The cervix uteri at different ages, Obstet. Gynecol. 14:621– 631.Google Scholar
  29. Huffman, J. W., 1948, Mesonephric remnants in the cervix, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 56: 23–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunter, R. H., 1930, Observations on the development of the human female genital tract, Contrib. Embryol. Carneg. Inst. 22: 91–108.Google Scholar
  31. Jost, A., 1972, A new look at the mechanisms controlling sex differentiation in mammals, Johns Hopkins Med. J. 130: 38–53.Google Scholar
  32. Koff, A. K., 1933, Development of the vagina in the human fetus, Contrib. Embryol. Carneg. Inst. 24: 59–90.Google Scholar
  33. Lauchlan, S. C., 1972, The secondary Müllerian system, Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 27: 133–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matejka, M., 1959, Die Morphogenese der menschlichen Vagina und ihre Gesetzmässigkeiten, Anat. Anz. 106: 20–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer, R., 1909, Zur Kenntnis des Gartnerschen (oder Wolffschen) Ganges besonders in der Vagina und dem Hymen des Menschen, Arch, mikroskop. Anat. 73: 751–792.Google Scholar
  36. Monie, I. W., and Sigurdson, L. A., 1950, A proposed classification for uterine and vaginal anomalies, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 59: 696–698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Monroe, C. W., and Spector, B., 1962, The epithelium of the hydatid of Morgagni in the human adult female, Anat. Ree. 142: 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morii, T., 1958, Statistical studies on the weights of female internal genital organs of human fetus, Shikoku Acta Med. 13: 212–230.Google Scholar
  39. Morrison, J., 1972, The development of the lower uterine segment, Aust. N.Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 12: 182–185.Google Scholar
  40. Ober, W. B., and Bernstein, J., 1955, Observations on the endometrium and ovary in the newborn, Pediatrics 16: 445–460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. O’Rahilly, R., 1973a, The embryology and anatomy of the uterus, in: The Uterus ( H. J. Norris, A. T. Hertig, and M. R. Abell, eds.), pp. 17–39, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  42. O’Rahilly, R., 19736, Developmental Stages in Human Embryos, including a Survey of the Carnegie Collection. Part A: Embryos of the First Three Weeks (Stages 1 to 9), Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  43. O’Rahilly, R., 1975, 4 Color Atlas of Human Embryology, Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  44. O’Rahilly, R., and Gardner, E., 1971, The timing and sequence of events in the development of the human nervous system during the embryonic period proper, Z. Anat. Entwicklungsgesch. 134: 1–12.Google Scholar
  45. O’Rahilly, R., and Muecke, E. C., 1972, The timing and sequence of events in the development of the human urinary system during the embryonic period proper, Z. Anat. Entwicklungsgesch. 138: 99–109.Google Scholar
  46. Politzer, G., 1953, Die Entwicklung des wolffschen Ganges beim Menschen, Acta Anat. 18: 343–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Politzer, G., 1955, Zur normalen und abnormen Entwicklung der menschlichen Scheide, Anat. Anz. 102: 271–278.Google Scholar
  48. Rolnick, D., Kawanoue, S., Szanto, P., and Bush, I. M., 1968, Anatomical incidence of testicular appendages Urol. 100: 755–756.Google Scholar
  49. Sanfilippo, S., and Niedobitek, F., 1965, Zur Pathogenese einer Endometriose im Bereich des Lumbaimarkes bei Spina bifida, Arch. Gynaekol 200: 452–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scammon, R. E., 1926, The prenatal growth and natal involution of the human uterus, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 23: 687–690.Google Scholar
  51. Shikinami, J., 1926, Detailed form of the Wolffian body in human embryos of the first eight weeks, Contrib. Embryol. Carneg. Inst. 18: 49–61.Google Scholar
  52. Song, J., 1964, The Human Uterus: Morphogenesis and Embryological Basis for Cancer, Thomas, Springfield, 111.Google Scholar
  53. Streeter, G. L., 1948, Developmental horizons in human embryos. Description of age groups XV, XVI, XVII, and XVIII, being the third issue of a survey of the Carnegie Collection, Contrib. Embryol. Carneg. Inst. 32: 133–203.Google Scholar
  54. Sundarasivarao, D., 1953, The Müllerian vestiges and benign epithelial tumours of the epididymis, J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 66: 417–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Szamborski, J., 1963, Mesonephric derivatives in the female genital tract with special reference to a staining method, Obstet. Gynecol. 21: 375–378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Szamborski, J., and Laskowska, H., 1968, Some observations on the developmental histology of the human foetal uterus, Biol. Neonat. 13: 298–314.Google Scholar
  57. Torrey, T. W., 1954, The early development of the human nephros, Contrib. Embryol. Carneg. Inst. 35: 175–197.Google Scholar
  58. Valdes-Dapena, M. A., 1957, An Atlas of Fetal and Neonatal Histology, Lippincott, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  59. Vilas, E., 19S4, Zur Entwicklung der menschlichen Scheide, Anz. 79: 150–151.Google Scholar
  60. Walz, W., 1958, Über die Genese der sogenannten indirekten Metaplasie im Bereich des Müllerschen-Gang-Systems, Z. Geburtshilfe Gynaekol. 151: 1–21.Google Scholar
  61. Wells, L. J., 1959, Embryology and anatomy of the vagina, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sei. 83: 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Witschi, E., 1970, Development and differentiation of the uterus, in: Prenatal Life ( H. C. Mack, ed.), pp. 11–35, Wayne State University Press, Detroit.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronan O’Rahilly
    • 1
  1. 1.Carnegie Laboratories of EmbryologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations