Abstract
Should patients who are doomed to die know their fate? This used to be a troublesome question, the most baffling in the entire issue of dying. Discussions were always theoretical. No scientific or clinical evidence existed for the comparison of the benefits in telling the patient with the benefits of remaining silent. Everybody guessed. Parlor talk and religion classes abounded with moral platitudes about man’s right to know his condition or about our duty to keep the patient comfortable by silence.“Every man has the right to know so he can put his house in order!” “Happiness is an inalienable right and should not be destroyed when nothing is accomplished!” Doctors differed in theory. In practice they were nearly unanimous in not telling. Clergymen leaned toward telling, though they were easily convinced otherwise if they were asked to tell. The dying were seldom consulted, only left to suffer the results of the arguments outside their door.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 Plenum Publishing Corporation
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kavanaugh, R.E. (1977). Humane Treatment of the Terminally Ill. In: Moos, R.H. (eds) Coping with Physical Illness. Current Topics in Mental Health. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2256-6_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2256-6_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2258-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2256-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive