Coping with a Chronic Disability: Psychosocial Observations of Girls with Scoliosis

  • Beverly A. Myers
  • Stanford B. Friedman
  • Irving B. Weiner
Part of the Current Topics in Mental Health book series (CTMH)


The psychosocial implications of wearing the Milwaukee brace for scoliosis have been commented upon by orthopedic surgeons. Riseborough1 summarizes: “Patients adapt to the brace rapidly, but the initial experience may provoke an emotional storm.” Harrington2 points out that a major alteration in daily living is involved and that patient-parent cooperation is critical for successful treatment. He groups brace wearers into three types: (1) brace riders (who develop ulcers on the chin and avoid exercises), (2) habit formers (who twist their necks and hence avoid the therapeutic forces of the brace), and (3) ideal patients. This paper represents a more detailed examination of how adolescent girls and their mothers psychologically adjust to the girl having to wear a Milwaukee brace.


Body Image Orthopedic Surgeon Adolescent Girl Coping Behavior Marital Conflict 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Riseborough, E. J. Current concepts: Treatment of scoliosis. New England Journal of Medicine 276:1429–1431, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harrington, P. R. Nonoperative treatment of scoliosis. Texas Medicine 64:54–65, 1958.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blount, W. P., & Bolinske, J. Physical therapy in the nonoperative treatment of scoliosis. Physical Therapy 47:919–923, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blount, W. P. Scoliosis and Milwaukee brace. Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases 19:152–165, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldstein, A. L. Surgical management of scoliosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 48:167–180, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lazarus, R. S., Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamburg, D. A., Hamburg, B., & deGoza, S. Adaptive problems and mechanisms in severely burned patients. Psychiatry 16:1–20, 1953.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Visotsky, H. M., Hamburg, D. A., Goss, M. A., et al. Coping behavior under extreme stress.Archives of General Psychiatry 5:423–488, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friedman, S. B., Chodoff, P., Mason, J. W., et al.: Behavioral observations on parents anticipating the death of a child. Pediatrics 32:610–625, 1963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wright, B. Physical disability: A psychological approach. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fisher, S. A further appraisal of the body boundary concept. Journal of Consulting Psychology 27:62–70, 1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fisher, S. Body image psychopathology. Archives of General Psychiatry 10:519–529, 1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fisher, S., & Cleveland, S. E. Body image and personality. Princeton, New Jersey: D Van Nostrand, 1958.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Landau, quoted by Wiener, I. Psychodiagnosis of schizophrenia. New York: John Wiley, 1966. P. 132.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kimmel, J. A comparison of children with congenital and acquired orthopedic handicaps on certain personality characteristics. Dissertation Abstracts 19:3023, 1959.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Green, M., & Haggerty, R. Ambulatory pediatrics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1968. P. 443.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beverly A. Myers
    • 1
  • Stanford B. Friedman
  • Irving B. Weiner
  1. 1.Johns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations