Rehabilitating the Stroke Patient through Patient — Family Groups

  • Judith Gregorie D’Afflitti
  • G. Wayne Weitz
Part of the Current Topics in Mental Health book series (CTMH)


The intermediate service of the West Haven Veterans Administration Hospital is designed as a rehabilitative setting for medical patients who have completed the phase of diagnosis and early treatment. In our nursing and social work with recuperating stroke patients and their families on this service, we noticed that although many patients were engaged in a program of physical, occupational, and speech therapy, they and their family members were frequently having great difficulty with the emotional acceptance of the patients’ disabilities. This was clear from the patients’ depressive affect and inability to express their feelings about their illness, with the concurrent inability of families to exchange reactions with the patients about the stroke and the ways in which this was going to affect their family life. For example, patients were often very frightened that any disability would mean that they could not function at home again. Family members sometimes shared this fear, and families and patients could not communicate their concerns. Because of this poor communication, there often was a strained relationship between patient and family, and realistic discharge plans could not be made. In addition, the patients did not use the appropriate community supports that would have allowed the most effective community adjustment, i.e., rehabilitation centers, visiting nurse associations, and vocational retraining centers.


Stroke Patient Rehabilitation Center Depressive Affect Chronic Disability General Medical Ward 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bardach, J. L. Group sessions with wives of aphasic patients. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 19:361–365, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruetman, M. E., & Gordon, E. E. Rehabilitating the stroke patient at general hospitals. Postgraduate Medicine 49:211–215, 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Engel, G. L. Grief and grieving. American Journal of Nursing 64:93–98, 1964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heller, V. Handicapped patients talk together. American Journal of Nursing 70:332–335, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Litman, T. J. An analysis of the sociologic factors affecting the rehabilitation of physically handicapped patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 45:9–16, 1964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Millen, H. M. The positive approach to the care of the stroke patients. Michigan Medicine 69:887–890, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Piskor, B. K., & Paleos, S. The group way to banish after-stroke blues. American Journal of Nursing 1968.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robertson, E. K., & Suinn, R. M. The determination of rate of progress of stroke patients through empathy measures of patient and family. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 12:189–191, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strauss, A. B., Burrucker, J. D., Cicero, J. A., & Edwards, R. C. Group work with stroke patients. Rehabilitation Record 30–32, Nov.-Dec., 1967.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith Gregorie D’Afflitti
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. Wayne Weitz
    • 3
  1. 1.Nursing ServiceVeterans Administration HospitalWest HavenUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of PsychiatryYale University School of MedicineUSA
  3. 3.Division V Outpatient ServicesBrooklyn State HospitalBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations