Cortical Extensions of the Limbic System

  • Leonard W. Hamilton


The cortex of the rat forms a smooth, relatively thin mantle over most of the structures that have been discussed thus far. Because the cortex is smooth, rather than convoluted, as in the case of animals having a more highly developed brain, the cerebral hemispheres are termed lissencephalic. The conceptual subdivision of a smooth mantle of cortex involves some technical difficulties, because there are few landmarks that can be used. Consequently, many of the subdivisions that have been made are based either on the detailed cellular structure of the layered cortex or on the juxtaposition to more clearly defined subcortical structures. The details of categorizing areas of the cortex on the basis of cellular organization go beyond the scope of this text, so the descriptions that follow will emphasize boundaries with respect to available landmarks. In most cases, though, the delineations were originally made by the careful study of cellular organization. Most notable in these types of studies are the classic descriptions of Krieg (1946) and Rose and Woolsey (1948). Additional accounts of these cortical systems and their connections may be found in articles by Clark (1932), Clark and Boggon (1933), Lorente de No (1934), Abbie (1938), Krieg (1947), Domesick (1969), and Leonard (1969).


Frontal Cortex Corpus Callosum Entorhinal Cortex Limbic System Thalamic Nucleus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Nauta, W.J.H., and Ebbesson, S.O.E. (Eds.) Contemporary Research Methods in Neuroanatomy. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. Bielschowski, M. Die Silberimprägnation der Neurofibrillen. J. Psychol. Neurol. (Lpz.), 4: 169–188, 1904.Google Scholar
  3. Blackstad, T.W. Electron microscopy of experimental axon degeneration in photochemically modified Golgi preparations: a procedure for precise mapping of nervous connections. Brain Res., 95: 191–210, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brazier, M.A.B. The Electrical Activity of the Nervous System. New York, Macmillan, 1961.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, G. The use of the Horsely-Clark instrument on the rat. Science, 90: 92, 1939.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowan, W.M., Gottlieb, D.I., Hendrickson, A., Price, J.L., and Woolsey, T.A. The autoradiographic demonstration of axonal connections in the central nervous system. Brain Res., 37: 21–51, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eleftheriou, B.E. (Ed.): The Neurobiology of the Amygdala, New York, Plenum Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. Falck, B. Observations on the possibilities of the cellular localization of monoamines by a flourescent method. Acta Physiol. Scand., 56:1–25, 1962 (Suppl. 197).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falck, B., Hillarp, N.A., Theme, G., and Torp, A. Flourescence of catecholamines and related compounds condensed with formaldehyde. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 10: 348–354, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fink, R.P., and Heimer, L. Two methods for selective silver impregnation of degenerating axons and their synaptic endings in the central nervous system. Brain Res., 4: 369–374, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuxe, K., Hökfelt, T., Jonsson, G., and Ungerstedt, U. In Nauta, W.J.H., and Ebbesson, S.O.E. (Eds.): Contemporary Research Methods in Neuroanatomy. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1970.Google Scholar
  12. Klüver, H., and Barrera, E.A. A method for the combined study of cells and fibers in the nervous system. J. Neuropath. Exp. Neurol., 12: 400–403, 1953.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lavail, J.H. The retrograde transport method. Fed. Proc., 34: 1618–1624, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis, P.R., Shute, C.C.D., and Silver, A. Confirmation from choline acetylase analyses of a massive cholinergie innervation to the rat hippocampus. J. Physiol. Lond., 191: 215–224, 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lynch, G., Gall, C., Mensah, P., and Cotman, C.W. Horseradish peroxidase histochemistry: a new method for tracing efferent projections in the central nervous system. Brain Res., 65: 373–380, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nauta, W.J.H., and Ebbesson, S.O.E. (Eds.) Contemporary Research Methods in Neuroanatomy. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1970. For a listing of chapter titles, see the previous section.Google Scholar
  17. Nauta, W.J.H. Silver impregnation of degenerating axons. In Windle, W.F. (Ed.): New Research Techniques of Neuroanatomy, Springfield, Thomas, 1957.Google Scholar
  18. Nauta, W.J.H., and Gygax, P.A. Silver impregnation of degenerating axons in the central nervous system: a modified technique. Stain Technol., 29: 91–93, 1954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nitsch, C., and Bak, I.J. Moss fiber endings of Ammon’s horn, demonstrated with the freeze etching technic. Verh. Anat. Ges., 68:319–323, 1974 (Ger.).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Powell, E.W., and Schnurr, R. Silver impregnation of degenerating axons; comparisons of postoperative intervals, fixatives, and staining methods. Stain Technol., 47: 95–100, 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Raisman, G. Neuronal plasticity in the septal nuclei of the adult rat. Brain Res., 14: 25–48, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sherlock, D.A., and Raisman, G. A comparison of anterograde and retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase in the connections of the mammillary nuclei in the rat. Brain Res., 85: 321–324, 1975.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard W. Hamilton
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations