Advertisement

Realities of Patient Consent to Medical Research

  • John Fletcher

Abstract

The theme of coercion and freedom is at the center of moral concern about the ethics of medical research in human beings. Intense efforts by groups in government, medical societies, and related professions have produced interpretations, codes, and regulations in the conduct of research.1 Among the many valued objectives clustered around the discussion of morality in medical research, obtaining informed consent from the subject in an experiment is emphasized most. The literature on the principles of informed consent is enormous. Ninety-nine percent of it considers what ought to be; only a small fraction contains reports of what happens when consent is given by patient to investigator. A handful of studies by Renée Fox, Henry K. Beecher, and Fellner and Marshall expose the fragility of the consent contract and lay bare many “myths” about the supposed freedom and rationality in informed consent.2 Due to the considerable doubts about the possibility of obtaining informed consent in many circumstances, a fresh treatment of the actualities of giving consent in medical experiments is in order.

Keywords

Consent Process Patient Consent Problem Project Human Encounter Fresh Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    John Fletcher, “Human Experimentation: Ethics in the Consent Situation,” Law and Contemporary Problems 34:620–649, 1967; andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. John Fletcher, “A Study of Ethics of Medical Research,” Th.D. thesis, Union Theological Seminary, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Renée C. Fox, Experiment Perilous (Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1959).Google Scholar
  4. Henry K. Beecher, “Ethics and Clinical Research,” New England Journal of Medicine 274:1354–1360, 1966, andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Henry K. Beecher, “Some Guiding Principles for Clinical Investigation,” Journal of the American Medical Association 195: 1135–1136, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. W. J. Curran and Henry K. Beecher, “Experimentation in Children,” Journal of the American Medical Association 210: 71–73, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. C. H. Fellner and J. R. Marshall, “Kidney Donors—The Myth of Informed Consent,” American Journal of Psychiatry 126:1245–1251, 1970.Google Scholar
  8. 3.
    H. Richard Niebuhr, The Responsible Self (New York: Harper and Row, 1963), p. 48.Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    Henry D. Aiken, Reason and Conduct (New York: Knopf, 1962), p. 75.Google Scholar
  10. 6.
    C. Kluckholm, H. A. Murray, and D. M. Schneider, Personality in Nature, Society, and Culture (New York: Knopf, 1964), p. 352.Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    I. Kant, “The Metaphysics of Morals,” Great Books of the Western World, edited by R. M. Hutchins, Vol. 42 (Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 1952), p. 274.Google Scholar
  12. 9.
    Martin Buber, I and Thou (New York: Scribner’s Sons, 1958), p. 34.Google Scholar
  13. 10.
    Paul Tillich, Morality and Beyond (New York: Harper and Row, 1963), p. 19.Google Scholar
  14. 11.
    Jean Piaget, The Moral Judgment of the Child (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1965), p. 395.Google Scholar
  15. Reinhold Niebuhr, Man’s Nature and His Communities (New York: Scribner’s Sons, 1965), p. 107.Google Scholar
  16. 12.
    Otto Guttentag, “The Problem of Experimentation on Human Beings: The Physician’s Point of View,” Science 117:209, 1953. Beecher, “Some Guiding Principles,” p. 1135.Google Scholar
  17. 14.
    L. C. Park, et al., “The Subjective Experience of the Research Patient,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 143:199–206, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 15.
    R. J. Savard, “Serving Investigator, Patient and Community in Research Studies,” Annals of the New York Academy of Science 169:429–434, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 16.
    E. Cahn, “The Lawyer as Scientist and Scoundrel: Reflections on Francis Bacon’s Quadricentennial,” New York University Law Review 36:8, 1961.Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    Fellner and Marshall, “Kidney Donors” J. P. Kemph, “Renal Failure, Artificial Kidney and Kidney Transplants,” American Journal of Psychiatry 122:1270–1274, 1966, andGoogle Scholar
  21. J. P. Kemph “Psychotherapy with Patients Receiving Kidney Transplant,” American Journal of Psychiatry 124:623–629, 1967.Google Scholar
  22. 19.
    R. Burlage, New York City’s Municipal Hospitals (Washington, D.C.: Institute for Policy Studies, 1967), p. 329.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Fletcher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations