Advertisement

Tensile Properties of Superconducting Composite Conductors and Nb-Ti Alloys at 4.2°K

  • D. S. Easton
  • C. C. Koch

Abstract

Large superconducting magnets will be used for plasma confinement in controlled thermonuclear fusion experiments. The presence of thermal, mechanical, and magnetic forces in these coils makes the understanding of mechanical properties of the superconducting windings important. This paper presents the results of tensile tests at 300, 77, and 4.2°K on commercial Nb-Ti composites with both Cu and Cu-Ni matrices. Tests were also conducted on Nb-Ti filaments produced by chemically removing the matrix of some composites as well as with sub-sized tensile samples of Nb-Ti alloys.

Keywords

Audio Signal Load Drop Composite Conductor Wire Sample Anelastic Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. E. Evetts and P. J. Martin: Metal Sci. J., 1973, vol. 7, pp. 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. N. Wilson: Composites 1970, vol. 1, pp. 341–344.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. J. Maddock: Composites 1969, vol. 1, pp. 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. W. Fowlkes, P. E. Angerhofer, R. N. Newton, and A. F. Clark: Characterization of a Superconducting Coil Composite Report No. NBSIR 73–349, Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Annapolis, Md.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Saint-James, E. J. Thomas, and G. Sarma: Type II Superconductivity Pergamon Press, New York, 1969, pp. 264–266.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z.J.J. Stekly and J. L. Zar: “Stable Superconducting Coils,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1965, vol. 12, pp. 367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.A.R. LeBlanc: IBM J. Res. Develop. 1962, vol. 6, pp. 122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. W. Edwards, C. A. Scott, and M. N. Wilson: “Applied Superconductivity Conference,” IEEE Trans. Magnetics 1975, vol. 11, pp. 532–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Evans: Science Research Council, Report No. RL-73–092, Rutherford Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, England, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. A. Wigley: Mechanical Properties of Materials at Low Temperatures Plenum Press, New York, 1971, pp. 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. S. Basinski: Roy. Soc. London Proc. Ser. A 1957, vol. 240, PP. 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Z. S. Basinski: Aust. J. Phys. 1959, vol. 13, pp. 354–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. C. Erdmann and J. A. Jahoda: Rev. Sci. Instr. 1963,vol. 34, pp. 172–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. C. Erdmann and J. A. Jahoda: J. Appl. Phys. 1968,vol. 39, pp. 2793–2797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Delaey, R. V. Krishnan, H. Tas, and H. Warlimont:J. Mater. Sci., 1974, vol 9, pp. 1521–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.V. Krishnan, L. Delaey, H. Tas, and H. Warlimont:J. Mater. Sci., 1974, vol. 9, pp. 1536–1544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Warlimont, L. Delaey, R. V. Krishnan, and H. Tas:J. Mater. Sci., 1974, vol. 9, pp. 1545–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. H. Richman: Deformation Twinning 1964, vol. 25, Gordon and Breach Science, New York, ed. R. E. Reed-Hill, J. P. Hirth, and H. C. Rogers, pp. 237–270.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. K. Hale and A. Kelly: Ann. Rev. Mater.Sci. 1972, vol. 2,pp. 405–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Kelly and G. J. Davies: Met. Rev. 1965, vol. l0, pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Crutchley: Met. Rev. 1965, vol. 10, pp. 79–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. R. Piehler: Trans. Met. Soc. AIME 1965, vol. 233, pp. 12–16.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Kelly: Strengthening Methods in Crystals, Applied Science London, 1971, pp. 433–475.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Lawley and M. J. Koczak: Role of the Interface on Elastic Plastic Composite Behavior Drexel University, ONR Tech.Report No 7, 1972.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. L. McDanels, R. W. Jech, and J. W. Weeton: Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 1965, vol. 233, pp. 636–642.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    W. C. Young and R. W. Boom: Proc. 4th Conf. Magnet Technology Brookhaven, USAEC CONF-720908, ed. Y. Winterbottom, 1972,pp. 244–251.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. P. Reed and R. P. Mikesell:J. Mater., 1967, vol. 2,pp. 370–392.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Miura, S. Maeda, and N. Nakanishi: Phil. Mag. 1974, vol. 30, pp. 565–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J.S. Abell and I. R. Harris: J. Less-Common Metals, 1972,vol. 29, PP. 104–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    C. Wert, D. 0. Thompson, and 0. Buck: J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1970, vol. 31, pp. 1793–1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Buck, D. 0. Thompson, and C. A. Wert: J. Phys. Chem. Solids1971, vol 32, pp. 2331–2344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Z. Dvorak, and E. B. Hawbolt: Met. Trans. 1975, vol. 6A, pp. 95–99.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    K. A. Gschneidner, Jr.: Solid State Phys. 1964, vol. 16, ed. F. Seitz and D. Turnbull, pp. 275–426, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    F. Heinigpr, E. Bucher, and J. Muller: Phys. Kondens Materie 1966, vol. 5, pp. 243–284.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York  1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. S. Easton
    • 1
  • C. C. Koch
    • 1
  1. 1.Metals and Ceramics DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations