Comments on the Josephson Plasma Resonance in 3He(A)

  • A. J. Dahm
  • D. N. Langenberg


Phenomena relating to the longitudinal nuclear magnetic resonance in superfluid 3He A are discussed on the basis of a previously proposed analogy between this resonance and the Josephson plasma resonance in superconductors. Some effects which are subject to experimental test are suggested.


Applied Magnetic Field Tunnel Junction Plasma Resonance Superconducting Tunnel Junction Pair Current 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    D. D. Osheroff and W. F. Brinkman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 584 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    H. M. Bozler, M. E. R. Bernier, W. J. Gully, R. C. Richardson, and D. M. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 875 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    R. A. Webb, R. L. Kleinberg, and J. C. Wheatley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 145 (1974); Phys. Lett.48A, 421 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. A. J. Leggett, Phys. Rev. Lett.29, 1227 (1972); 31, 352 (1973); J. Phys. C: Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 6, 3187 (1973).Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    A. J. Leggett, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 85, 11 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    K. Maki and T. Tsuneto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 52, 773 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    B. D. Josephson, Phys. Lett.1., 251 (1962).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    N. F. Pedersen, T. F. Finnegan, and D. N. Langenberg, Phys. Rev.B6, 4151 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    D. N. Langenberg, Rev. de Phys. Appl. (Suppl. J. de Phys.)9, 35 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    R. E. Harris, Phys. Rev. B10, 84 (1974), and references therein.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    P. W. Anderson, in Prog. Low Temp. Phys., C. J. Gorter, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967), Vol. V, p. 1.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    D. B. Sullivan and J. E. Zimmerman, Am. J. Phys. 39, 1504 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    G. I. Rochlin and P. K. Hansma, Am. J. Phys. 41, 878 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    A. J. Dahm, A. Denenstein, T. F. Finnegan, D. N. Langenberg, and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 859 (1968); 20, 1020E (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    N. R. Werthamer, Phys. Rev. 147, 255 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    Maki has calculated this term to be very small if it exists (private communication).Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    A. J. Dahm and D. N. Langenberg, J. Low Temp. Phys. 19, 145 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    P. Balkashin, L. I. Ostrovsky, and I. K. Yanson, Phys. of the Condensed State, No. 28, 3 Khar’kov (1973).Google Scholar
  19. (19).
    C. K. Bak, B. Kofoed, N. F. Pedersen, and K. Saermark (to be published in Appl. Phys. Lett.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Dahm
    • 1
  • D. N. Langenberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physics and Laboratory for Research on the Structure of MatterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations