The Measurement Act in Quantum Physics

  • James L. Park


Until the advent of modern quantum theory with its profoundly statistical nature, most uncritical scientists probably espoused a doctrine of epistemological realism which presumed, rather boldly, that the mechanistic world described by the classical theories constituted quite literally a model, a facsimile, of ontological reality. With the empirical failures of mechanism and the striking successes of the irreducibly probabilistic quantum theory, the prevailing philosophical inclinations of physical theorists shifted during the 1920s toward epistemological idealism. Unfortunately, the considerable critical merits of the latter, an enlightened approach to science founded by Kant centuries before, were almost lost as physicists of the so-called Copenhagen school extrapolated idealism into solipsism until the orthodox natural philosophy of quantum physics had degenerated to a subjectivistic blend of physics and psychology wherein physical states of physical systems could be altered by the mere deliverance of information into the consciousness of the experimenter.


Quantum Theory Classical Physic Probability Match Copenhagen Interpretation Primitive Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. Margenau. The Nature of Physical Reality. New York: McGraw-Hill (1950).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Margenau. Physics Today 7 (1954), 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Margenau. Phil. Sci. 4 (1937), 337; Phil. Sci. 30 (1963), 6; and many other papers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Feyerabend. Phil. Sci. 35 (1968), 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Copernicus. De Revolutionibus Orbium Caelestium (1543). Translated by J. F. Dobson and S. Brodetsky. Occasional Notes of the Royal Astronomical Society 2 (1947), 9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Bohr. In P. Schilpp (ed.). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Physicist. New York: Harper (1959), p. 209.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Heisenberg. Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper (1958), p. 44.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Park and H. Margenau. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1 (1968), 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Park. Phil. Sci. 35 (1968), Part I, 205, Part II, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Park. Found. Phys. 1 (1970), 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Band and J. Park. Found. Phys. 1 (1970), 133. Cf. also Found. Phys. 1 (1971), Parti, 211, Part II, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • James L. Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsWashington State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations