• Andrew P. Vayda


So-called conflict theorists and the many scholars who have asked about the causes of war have seldom looked at war as a process. Instead they have generally accepted, implicitly or explicitly, a simple dichotomy between war and peace. One author, reviewing contributions to the Journal of Conflict Resolution during the years 1957–1968, has remarked: “I get the feeling that, for most JCR contributors, once a war happens, it ceases to be interesting” (Converse, 1968:476-477). Commenting on this, a historian has suggested that conflict theorists’ neglect of the dynamics of war may reflect a prevalent notion that “once a war breaks out, its end is inherent in its beginning—simply a mindless, inescapable playing-out of forces set in motion at the outset ...” (Carroll, 1970:15). Even with the kind of awareness of escalation that has been forced upon all of us by the recent example of the development of small wars into a larger one in Southeast Asia, the literature on escalation remains, as remarked by the editors of a book on Theory and Research on the Causes of War, “quite scanty” (Pruitt and Snyder, 1969:57).


Response Process Population Pressure Ecological Perspective Specific Observation Conflict Theorist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew P. Vayda
    • 1
  1. 1.Cook CollegeRutgers UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations