Advertisement

Some Suggestions for Reclassification of Ontogenetically Relevant Early Psychomotor Behavior

  • Herbert Kaye

Abstract

In psychology “responses,” or action patterns (or other descriptions of movement), form the operational basis on which the science has been built. Developmental psychology attempts to describe the ontogenetic changes in these patterns and their underlying processes. However, this is complicated by the fact that in addition to changes brought about by experience, there is evidence to suggest that the child’s behavioral “base” is changing. Because these changes have gross systematic species characteristics, it is tempting to talk about basic, age-related motor patterns as though these existed as entities independently of theoretical and methodological constraints. This is, in some respects, similar to the way psychology previously approached the description and measurement of sensory processes. That is, the procedures employed were built on the assumption that the minimal sensitivity of the sensory organs could be estimated independently of the person’s motivation, cognition, learning, perceptual strategies, etc. (Corso, 1963). However, with recent signal detection models (Swets, 1961), these factors have all been shown to play a role in the production of the levels of behavior that index “when” a signal has been sensed.

Keywords

Behavioral Attribute Experimental Child Psychology Instrumental Conditioning Infant Behavior Theoretical System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anastasi, A. Heredity, environment and the question “how.” Psychological Review, 1958, 65, 197–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bijou, S. W., and Baer, D. M. Child development II: Universal stage of infancy. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Meredith Corp., 1965.Google Scholar
  3. Bosma, J. Form and function in the infant’s mouth and pharynx. In J. Bosma (Ed.), Third symposium on oral sensation and perception: The mouth of the infant. Springfield, Ill.: C. C. Thomas, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Brassell, W. R., Jr., and Kaye, H. Feedback from the sucking environment and subsequent modification of sucking behavior in the human neonate. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974, 18, 448–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, J. Instrumental control of the sucking response in human newborns. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972, 14, 66–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corso, J. F. A theoretico-historical review of the threshold concept. Psychological Bulletin, 1963, 60, 356–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dennenberg, V. H. The development of behavior, papers selected by Dennenberg. Stamford: Sinaur Assoc, Inc., 1972.Google Scholar
  8. Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P., and Vigorito, J. Speech perception in infants. Science, 1971, 171, 303–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitzgerald, H. E., & Brackbill, Y. Stimulus-response organization, state, and conditionability during early infancy. Paper presented at S.R.C.D. meeting, Philadelphia, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. Harris, D. B. Child psychology and the concept of development. In D. S. Palermo and L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Research readings on child psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1963.Google Scholar
  11. Hutt, S. J., Lenard, A. G., and Prechtl, H. F. R. Psychophysiological studies in newborn humans. In L. P. Lipsitt and H. W. Reese (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  12. Kagan, J. Cross-cultural perspectives in early development: A progress report. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, 1973.Google Scholar
  13. Karp, E. J., and Kaye, H. The effects of early feeding experience on the sucking patterns of neonates. Unpublished manuscript, 1973.Google Scholar
  14. Kaye, H. Infant sucking behavior and its modification. In L. P. Lipsitt and C. C. Spiker (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  15. Kaye, H. Effect of variations of oral experience upon suckle. In J. Bosma (Ed.), Third symposium on oral sensation and perception: The mouth of the infant. Springfield, Ill.: C. C. Thomas, 1972.Google Scholar
  16. Lenneberg, E. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
  17. Lipsitt, L. P. Learning in the first year of life. In C. C. Spiker and L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  18. Lipsitt, L. P., and Kaye, H. Conditioned sucking in the human newborn. Psychonomic Science, 1964, 1, 29–30.Google Scholar
  19. Lipsitt, L. P., and Kaye, H. Changes in neonatal responses to optimizing and non-optimizing sucking stimulation. Psychonomic Science, 1965, 2, 221–222.Google Scholar
  20. Lipsitt, L. P., Kaye, H., and Bosack, T. N. Enhancement of neonatal sucking through reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1966, 4, 163–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Little, A. H. Eyelid conditioning in the human infant as a function of the I.S.I. Paper presented at S.R.C.D. meetings, Minneapolis, 1971.Google Scholar
  22. Papousek, H. Conditioned head rotation reflexes in infants in the first months of life. Acta Paediatrica, 1961, 50, 565–576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piaget, J. Development and learning. In C. S. Lavatelli and F. Stendler (Eds.), Readings in child behavior and development (3rd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972. Pp. 38–46.Google Scholar
  24. Reese, H. W., and Lipsitt, L. P. Experimental child psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1970. Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  25. Sameroff, A. J. The components of sucking in the human newborn. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1968, 6, 607–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schaie, K. W. A reinterpretation of age-related changes in cognitive structure and functioning. In L. R. Goulet and P. B. Bates (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Research and theory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  27. Sherrington, C. S. The integrative action of the nervous system. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1906, 1948.Google Scholar
  28. Siqueland, E. R., and Lipsitt, L. P. Conditioned head turning in human newborns. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1966, 3, 356–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Staats, A. W. Learning, language, and cognition. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1968.Google Scholar
  30. Swets, J. A. Is there a sensory threshold? Science, 1961, 134, 168–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Swazey, J. P. Reflexes and motor integration: Sherrington’s concept on integrative action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  32. Taft, L. T., and Cohen, J. H. Neonatal and infant reflexology. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Exceptional infant, Vol. 1: The normal infant. New York: Brunner-Mazel, 1967.Google Scholar
  33. Turkewitz, G., Moreau, T., Birch, H. G., and Davis, L. Relationships among responses in the human newborn: The non-association and non-equivalence among different indicators of responsiveness. Psychophysiology, 1971, 7, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wohlwill, J. F. The age variable in psychological research. Psychological Review, January 1970, 77, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wolff, P. H. The causes, controls and organization of behavior in the neonate. Psychological Issues, 1966, 5, 17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herbert Kaye
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations