Advertisement

The Use of Differences and Similarities in Comparative Psychopathology

  • R. A. Hinde

Abstract

In any symposium concerned with the relevance of animal data to man, a biologist is inevitably ambivalent. Since his science is unified by the theory of evolution by natural selection, he must hold that there are or have been continuities between animals and man—a view that is reinforced as more and more similarities at the molecular and biochemical levels are revealed. But at the same time, much of a biologist’s training is concerned with the nature of species differences. He has learned how even closely related species are adapted to different enviornments, and how the resulting differences are superimposed on broad phyletic changes of a more fundamental nature, including differences in complexity of organization (e.g., Schneirla, 1949). The awareness of adaptation and consequent diversity has caused him to have reservations about the psychologist’s search for a comprehensive theory of behavior (Hinde & Stevenson-Hinde, 1973; Seligman & Hager, 1972), and to doubt the simplistic belief that the capacities of higher organisms can be understood directly in terms of more elementary functions (Schneirla, 1949). Thus, a biologist’s training promotes awareness both of the continuities and of the differences between animals and man.

Keywords

Rhesus Monkey Human Case Separation Experience Free Environment Bonnet Macaque 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arber, A. The Mind and the Eye. Cambridge: The University Press, 1954, pp. 40–44.Google Scholar
  2. Azrin, N. H., Hutchinson, R. R., & Hake, D. F. Extinction-induced agression. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 9, 1966, 191–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, R. Q. A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychol. Rev., 1968, 75, 81–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkowitz, L. In Aggression—Origins and Determinants, W. W. Hartup & J. de Wit (Eds.). The Hague: Mouton, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. Bernal, J. F., & Richards, M. P. M. What can zoologists tell us about human development? In S. A. Barnett (Ed.), Ethology and Development. London: Heinemann, 1973.Google Scholar
  6. Blurton-Jones, N. G. (Ed.) Ethological studies of child behaviour, Cambridge: The University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  7. Bowlby, J. Maternal Care and Mental Health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1951.Google Scholar
  8. Bowlby, J. Attachment and Loss (Vol. 1). London: Hogarth, 1969.Google Scholar
  9. Calhoun, J. B. Population density and social pathology. Scientific American, 1962, 206, 139–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Craik, K. J. W. The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge: The University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
  11. Denenberg, V. H. Experimental programming of life histories and the creation of individual differences: a review. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behaviour, 1968: Effects of Early Experience, Miami: University of Miami Press, 1970, pp. 61–91.Google Scholar
  12. Denenberg, V. H., & Whimbey, A. E. Experimental programming of life histories: toward an experimental science of individual differences. Developmental Psychobiology, 1968 1(1), 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dollard, J., Doob, L. W. Miller, N. E. Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. Frustration and Aggression. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglas, J. W. B. Early hospital admissions and later disturbances of behaviour and learning. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1975, 17, 456–480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harlow, H. F., & Suomi, S. J. Nature of love—simplified, Amer. Psychologist, 1970, 25, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harlow, H. F., & Zimmermann, R. R. Affectional responses in the infant monkey. Science, 1959, 130, 421–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harper, L. V. Ontogenetic and phylogenetic functions of the parent-offspring relationship in mammals. Adv. Study Behav., 1970, 3, 75–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henry, J. P., Meehan, J. P., & Stephens, P. M. The use of psychosocial stimuli to induce prolonged systolic hypertension in mice. Psychosom. Med., 1967, 29, 408–433.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hinde, R. A. Ethological models and the concept of “drive.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1956, VI, 24, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinde, R. A. Analyzing the roles of the partners in a behavioural interaction—mother-infant relations in rhesus macaques. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1969, 159, 651–667.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hinde, R. A. The study of aggression—determinants, consequences, goals and functions. In W. W. Hartup & J. De Wit (Eds.), Aggression, Origins and Determinants. The Hague: Mouton, 1974.Google Scholar
  22. Hinde, R. A. & Davies, L. M. Changes in mother-infant relationship after separation in rhesus monkeys. Nature, 1972, 239, 41–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hinde, R. A., & Spencer-Booth, Y. The effect of social companions on mother-infant relations in rhesus monkeys. In D. Morris (Ed.), Primate Ethology. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1967.Google Scholar
  24. Hinde, R. A., & Spencer-Booth, Y. Effects of brief separation from mother on rhesus monkeys. Science, 1971, 173, 111–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinde, R. A., & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (Eds.). Constraints on Learning: Limitations and Predispositions. London: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  26. Hinde, R. A., & White, L. The dynamics of a relationship—rhesus monkey ventro-ventral contact. J. Comp Physiol. Psychol. 86, 8–23.Google Scholar
  27. Holst, D. von. Renal failure as the cause of death in Tupaia belangeri exposed to persistent social stress. J. Comp. Physiol, 1972, 78, 286–306.Google Scholar
  28. Kaufman, I. C., & Rosenblum, L. A. Effects of separation from mother on the emotional behavior of infant monkeys. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1969, 159, 681–695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehrman, D. S. In N. F. White (Ed.), Ethology and Psychiatry. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  30. McKinney, W. T., Suomi, S. J., & Harlow, H. F. Depression in primates. Amer. J. Psychiatry, 1971, 127, 1313–1320.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, N. E. Liberalization of basic S-R concepts. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology a Study of a Science, Study 1, Vol. 2, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.Google Scholar
  32. Rheingold, H. L., & Eckerman, C. O. Departures from the mother. In H. R. Schaffer (Ed.), The Origins of Human Social Relations. London: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  33. Rosenblatt, D. S. In N. F. White (Ed.), Ethology and Psychiatry, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenblum, L. A. Infant attachment in monkeys. In H. R. Schaffer (Ed.), The Origins of Human Social Relations. London: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  35. Rutter, M. Maternal Deprivation. Harmonsworth: Penguin, 1972.Google Scholar
  36. Schaffer, H. R., & Emerson, P. E. The development of social attachments in infancy. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Devel., 1964, 29, 3.Google Scholar
  37. Schneirla, T. C. Levels in the psychological capacities of animals. In R. W. Sellars et al. (Ed.), Philosophy for the Future, New York: Macmillan, 1949.Google Scholar
  38. Seay, B., & Harlow, H. F. Maternal separation in the rhesus monkey. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1965, 140, 434–441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seligman, M. E. P., & Hager, J. L. (Eds.) Biological Boundaries of Learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.Google Scholar
  40. Spencer-Booth, Y. S., & Hinde, R. A. Effects of brief separations from mothers during infancy on behaviour of rhesus monkeys 6–24 months later. J. Child Psychol. Psychiat., 1971, 12, 157–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spitz, R. A. Anaclitic depression. Psychoanal. Study Child., 1946, 2, 313–342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Toulmin, S. E. The Philosophy of Science. London: Hutchinson, 1953, pp. 31–39, 165-167.Google Scholar
  43. Ulrich, R., & Symannek, B. Pain as a stimulus for aggression. In S. Garattini & E. B. Sigg (Eds.), Aggressive Behaviour. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Hinde
    • 1
  1. 1.MRC Unit on the Development and Integration of BehaviourUniversity Sub-Department of Animal BehaviourMadingley, CambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations