Advertisement

Calcium and Cyclic AMP Effects on Rabbit Epididymal Spermatozoa

  • Bayard T. Storey

Abstract

The divalent cation Ca+2 plays a central role in many physiological processes through its control of many properties and functions of cell membranes (1, 2). Morita and Chang (3) have reported that Ca+2 was required to maintain the motility of hamster spermatozoa incubated at 37°C, but that the motility of guinea pig, rat and rabbit spermatozoa was maintained in the absence of this ion. Effects of Ca+2 on rabbit spermatozoa might be expected, since rabbit oviduct fluid contains about 2 mM Ca+2, as originally shown by Holmdahl and Mastroianni (4). Increased respiration by rabbit spermatozoa in rabbit oviduct fluid has been demonstrated (5, 6), but this has been attributed to HCO3 in the fluid. The effect of Ca+2 in this regard has never been assessed. We have shown in this laboratory (7, 8) a direct effect of Ca+2 on the mitochondria in hypotonically treated rabbit sperm cells in which mitochondria are intact and accessible to added reagents: respiration is increased as Ca+2 is taken up in an energy-linked process which competes rather poorly for the high energy intermediates of oxidative phosphorylation. The physiological significance of this mitochondrial Ca+2 uptake is as obscure for the sperm cell as it is for other mammalian cells in which the uptake is far more efficient (9–11).

Keywords

Oxidative Phosphorylation Sperm Cell Pyridine Nucleotide Motile Cell Epididymal Sperm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bianchi, C.P. (1968). “Cell Calcium,” Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manery, J.B. (1969). In: Mineral Metabolism (C.L. Cornar and F. Bronner.), Vol. 3, pp. 405 - 452, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morita, Z. and Chang, M.C. (1970). Biol. Reprod. 3, 169–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holmdahl, T.H. and Mastroianni, L., Jr. (1965). Fertil. Steril. 16, 587–595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Folly, C.W. and Williams, W.L. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 126, 634–637.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brackett, B.G. (1968). Sixth Cong. Intern. Reprod. Anim. Insem. Artif., Paris JL, 43–46.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Storey, B.T. and Keyhani, E. (1973). FEBS Letters 37, 33–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Storey, B.T. and Keyhani, E. (1974). Fertil. Steril. 25, 976–984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chance, B. (1965). J. Biol. Chem. 240, 2729–2748.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lehninger, A.L., Carafoli, E., and Rossi, C.S. (1967), Advan. Enzymol. 29, 259–320.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lehninger, A.L. (1970). Biochem. J. 119, 129–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morton, B., Harrigan-Lum, J., Albagli, L., and Jooss, T. (1974). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 56, 372–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garbers, D.L., First, N.L., Sullivan, J.J., and Lardy, H.A. (1971). Biol. Reprod. 5., 336–339.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoskins, D.D. (1973). J. Biol. Chem. 248, 1135–1140.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tash, J.S. and Mann, T. (1973). Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 184, 109–114.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garbers, D.L., First, N.L., and Lardy, H.A. (1973). Biol. Reprod. 8, 589–598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morton, B.E. and Chang, T.S.K. (1973). J. Reprod. Fert. 35, 255–263.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shoenfeld, C., Amelar, R.D., and Dubin, L. (1973). Fertil. Steril. 24, 772–775.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keyhani, E. and Storey, B.T. (1973). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 305, 557–569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scarpa, A. (1972). Methods Enzymol. 24, 343–351,Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chance, B. (1972). Methods Enzymol, 24, 322–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chance, B. and Williams, G.R. (1956). Advan. Enzymol. 17, 65–134.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reed, P.W. and Lardy, H.A. (1972). J. Biol. Chem. 247, 6970–6977.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tibbs, J. (1962). In: Spermatozoan Motility11 (D.W. Bishop, ed.), pp. 233–250, Publication No. 72, Amer. Assoc. Advance. Sei., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vinogradov, A., Scarpa, A., and Chance, B. (1972). Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 152, 646–652.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chasin, M., Harris, D.N., Phillips, M.B., and Hess, S.M. (1972). Biochem. Pharmacol. 21, 2443–2450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hoskins, D.D., Stephens, D.T., and Hall, M.L. (1974). J. Reprod. Fert. 37, 131–133.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bayard T. Storey
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of MedicineUniv. of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations