Advertisement

Raman, Photoconductive, and Acoustoelectric Probes of Residual Deep Impurities and Absorption in GaAs

  • D. A. Abramsohn
  • G. K. Celler
  • Ralph Bray
Part of the Optical Physics and Engineering book series (OPEG)

Abstract

We present several techniques to test and characterize GaAs for residual deep impurities and weak optical absorption at 1.06 µ. 90° Raman scattering intensities were measured as a function of position along a sample to probe the attenuation of a collimated YAG laser beam and to obtain the absorption coefficient. The absorption at 1.06 µ may be due to native defects. Their concentration was obtained from saturation photoconductive studies with intense Q-switched YAG laser radiation. A 25 fold increaselin conductivity yielded a defect concentration of ≈ 1016 cm−3. In addition we have used propagating acoustoelectric domains, ≈ 1 mm wide, to scan the sample for inhomogeneities in both dark and photoexcited carrier concentration.

Keywords

High Light Intensity Raman Line Free Electron Concentration Electron Capture Cross Section Raman Scattered Light 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. C. Lee and H. Y. Fan, Phys. Rev. B 9, 3502 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. A. Kleinman, R. C. Miller and W. A. Nordland, Appl. Phys. Lett. 23, 243 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Y. Yu and M. Cardona, Solid State Commun. 9, 1421 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Bettini and M. Cardona, Proc. 11th Intern. Conf. Phys. Semicond. ( Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw 1972 ) p. 1072.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    J. Pastrnak and K. Vedam, Phys. Rev. B 3, 2567 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    D. Bois and P. Pinard, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 7, 85 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    M. D. Sturge, Phys. Rev. 127, 768 (1962).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    D. Bois and P. Pinard, Phys. Rev. B 9, 4171 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    D. Bois and M. Boulou, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 22, 671 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    C. H. Henry and D. V. Lang, Proc. 12th Intern. Conf. Phys. Semicond., (B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart 1974 ) p. 411.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    It is interesting to note that an analogous saturation in optical absorption has been seen by A. E. Michel and M. I. Nathan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 6, 101 (1965), under different circumstances. Their observations were made with GaAs injection laser radiation (105 W/cm2) on compensated p-GaAs with ti 5 x 1017 atoms/cm3 of manganese as the absorbing impurity and absorption coefficient of about 140 cm-1 at low light intensities.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    D. L. Spears, Phys. Rev. B 2, 1931 (1970).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    For reviews on domain formation and propagation see: N. I. Meyer and M. H. Jorgensen, Fesktirperprobleme 10, 21 (1970)Google Scholar
  14. M. B. N. Butler, Rep. Prog. Phys. 37, 421 (1974).Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    D. L. Spears and R. Bray, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 5093 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 14.
    J. K. Wajda and R. Bray, Proc. 12th Intern. Conf. Phys. Semicond. (B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart 1974 ) p. 877.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Abramsohn
    • 1
  • G. K. Celler
    • 1
  • Ralph Bray
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations