Ion-Excited X-Ray Analysis of Environmental Samples

  • Thomas A. Cahill


Major advances in the application of accelerators to environmental analysis have occurred in the past four years, largely though not entirely based upon the detection of ion-excited x-rays by energy dispersive Si (Li) and Ge (Li) detectors. While these advances parallel other improvements made in the area of quantitative elemental analysis in the past decades (neutron activation analysis, mass spectroscopy, optical methods), it is important to realize that the information delivered to workers in the biological and physical sciences by these accelerator-based techniques is very different from anything normally available in the past. Ion-excited x-ray analysis (IXA) is capable of delivering to a user quantitative multi-elemental analyses for all elements heavier than about neon to good detection limits, parts per million (ppm), at an extremely low cost per element. For example, recent programs in aerosol analysis have been delivering positive elemental determinations in aerosol samples at $0.20 per element using IXA, while an optical method, atomic absorbtion analysis, costs about $20.00 per element for the same information.


Count Rate Environmental Sample Heavy Element Light Element Minimum Detectable Limit 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    “Monitoring of Smog Aerosols with Elemental Analysis by Accelerator Beams”, T.A. Cahill, R.G.Flocchini, R.A. Eldred, P.J. Feeney, S. Lange, D. Shadoan, and G. Wolfe, Proc. 7th Materials Research Symposium, National Bureau of Standards (1974); “Regional Monitoring of Smog Aerosols”, T.A.Cahill and R.G.Flocchini, report to the California Air Resources Board, UCD/CNL Report 184 (1974)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Folkmann, C. Gaarde, T. Huus, K. Kemp, Nucl. Instr. And Methods 116, 487 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. G. Flocchini, P.J. Feeney, R.L. Sommerville, and T.A. Cahill, Nucl. Instr.& Methods 100, 397 (1972);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3a.
    T.A. Cahill, R.G. Flocchini, P.J. Feeney, and D.J. Shadoan, Nucl. Instr. & Methods 120, 193 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    “Cyclotron Analysis of Atmospheric Contaminants”, T.A. Cahill, UCD/CNL 162 (1972); “Development of X-ray Fluorescence and Applications”, F.P.Brady and T.A.Cahill, UCD/CNL 166 (1973), final report to the RANN division, National Science FoundationGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    Values presented by J. Cooper, 4/73, Battelle Northwest mmeting on aerosol analysis (Seattle). Oxygen value from UCD work.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    J.A. Cooper, Nucl. Instr & Methods 106, 365 (1973) and numerous unpublished results from many laboratories.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    “High Energy Nuclear Data Handbook”, W. Galbraith, W.S.C.Williams, Rutherford Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Berkshire, ENGLAND, reprinted on pocket cards by Reviews of Modern Physics.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    “Large Area Silicon X-Ray Detectors”, R.S.Frankel and D.W.Aitken, Kevex Corp., 898 Mahler Road, Burlingame, Calif. 94010Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    H. Thibeau, J. Stadel, W. Cline, and T.A. Cahill, Nucl. Instr & Methods 111, 615 (1973); based upon a suggestion by F. Goulding, J. Jaklevic, and D. Landis, Lawrence Berkeley Lab.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    J. Harrison and R.A. Eldred, Adv. in X-Ray Analysis 17, 560(1973) Code available in Fortran IV from UCD.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Roger K. Wyrick and Thomas A. Cahill, P hysical Review A8, 2288 (1973)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    Micromatter Corporation, Seattle, Washington; Ortec, Inc., Oak Ridge, TennesseeGoogle Scholar
  14. 13.
    J.R. Rhodes, ASTM Tech. Publ. 485, 243 (1971);Google Scholar
  15. 13a.
    J.R. Rhodes and C. B. Hunter, X-Ray Spectrometry 1, 113 (1972);“Self Absorption Corrections”, T.G. Dzubay and R.O.Nelson (1974) Denver X-ray.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 14.
    Trademark, Dupont Corporation, Mylar (C10H8O4)n; Kapton, (C22H10N2O4)nGoogle Scholar
  17. 15.
    Trademark, Gelman CorporationGoogle Scholar
  18. 16.
    Trademark, Nuclepore Corporation, Vallecitos, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  19. 17.
    R.L. Walter, R.D. Willis, W.F. Gutknecht, and J.M. Joyce, Anal.Chem. 46, 843 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 18.
    D.A. Lundgren, J. Air Pollution Control Assoc. 17, 4 (1967)Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    “Contribution of Freeway Traffic to Airborne Particulate Matter”, T.A. Cahill and P.J. Feeney, UCD/CNL 169 (1973). Report to the California Air Resources Board. (NTIS)Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    Unpublished observation, T.A.CahillGoogle Scholar
  23. 21.
    Ref.4, plus unpublished study for the Calif. Dept. of Public Health, Air and Industrial Laboratory, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  24. 22.
    D.C. Camp, J.A. Cooper, and J.R. Rhodes, X-Ray Spectrometry III, #1 (1974);Google Scholar
  25. 22a.
    D. Camp, A.N.S. Transactions 17, 106 (1973); D. Camp, Proc. 23rd Annual Conference on Applications of X-Ray Analysis, Denver (7/1974).Google Scholar
  26. 23.
    Proc. 7th Material Research Symposium, National Bureau of Standards, (10/1974).Google Scholar
  27. 24.
    R. K. Jolly and H. B. White, Nucl. Instr. and Methods 97, 103(1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bibliography 1970

  1. Coockson, J. and M. Poole, 1970, New Scientist, p. 404.Google Scholar
  2. Duggan, J. L. (editor), March 1970, The Second Conference on the Use of Small Accelerators in Teaching and Research, AEC Conf.-700322.Google Scholar
  3. Duggan, J. L., 1970, “The Use of Small Accelerators in Teaching”, Symposium on the Use of Small Accelerators (New York: American Nuclear Society.).Google Scholar
  4. Johansson, T. B., and R. Akselsson, S. A. E. Johansson, 1970, “X-ray analysis: Elemental trace analysis at the 10–12 g level”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 84, 141–143.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Needham, P. B. and J. R. Sartwell, B. D. Sartwell, 1970, Adv. X-ray Anal. 14, 184.Google Scholar
  6. Spaulding, J., 1970, “Charged Particle Induced X-Ray Experiments”, The Second Conference on the Use of Small Accelerators, AEC Conf.-700322.Google Scholar
  7. Jarvis, O. N., and C. Whitehead, M. Shah, 1970, AERE Report No. R 6612, (unpub.).Google Scholar
  8. Akselsson, B and T. B. Johansson, 1971, “A beam mapping method”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 91, 663–664.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cahill, T. A. and R. G. Flocchini, R. Sommerville, P. K. Mueller, A. Alcocer, March 1971, “Chemical Analysis of Atmospheric Aerosols: Alpha-Excited X-Ray Emission”, Amer. Chem. Soc, Kendall Symposium, Los Angeles (March, 1971).Google Scholar
  10. Cahill, T. A. and R. Sommerville, R. Flocchini, August 1971, “Elemental Analysis of Smog by Charged Particle Beams: Elastic Scattering and X-Ray Fluorescence”, Nuclear Methods in Environmental Research, A.N.S. Symposium, Columbia, Missouri, Pg. 6.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. L. and P. O’Brien, L. A. McNelles, 1971, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 92, 269.Google Scholar
  12. Duggan, J. L. and W. M. Beck, August 1971, “X-Ray Trace Analysis Experiments,” The Conference on the Use of Nuclear Techniques in the Solution of Environmental Problems held in Columbia, Mo.Google Scholar
  13. Johansson, T. B. and R. Akselsson, S. A. E. Johansson, 1971, Adv. X-Ray Analysis 15, 373.Google Scholar
  14. Jolly, R. K. and M. B. White, 1971, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 97, 103.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Watson, R. L. and J. R. Sjurseth, R. W. Howard, 1971, “An investigation of the analytical capabilities of X-ray emission induced by high energy alpha particles”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 93, 69–76.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bibliography 1972

  1. Cahill, T. A., October, 1972, Report to the California Air Resources Board and Project Clean Air, University of California, Davis, Rep. No. UCD-CNL 162.Google Scholar
  2. Cahill, T. A., 1972, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 17, 505.Google Scholar
  3. Cahill, T. A., 1972, “Accelerators in Env. Analysis”, Transactions A.N.S. 15, 178.Google Scholar
  4. Cahill, T. A. and R. Sommerville, 1972, “Automatic Analysis of Atmospheric Aerosol for Research and Monitoring Purposes”, Transactions A.N.S. 15, 70.Google Scholar
  5. Cookson, J. A. and A. T. G. Ferguson, F. D. Piling, 1972, “Proton Microbeams, their production and Use”, Chemical Analysis by Charged Particle Beams, 39 (1972); Elsevier Sequois S. A., Lausanne; J. Radioanal. Chem. 12, 39.Google Scholar
  6. Deconninck, G., 1972, “Quantitative Analysis by (p, X) and (p, gamma) reactions at low energies”, Chemical Analysis by Charged Particle Bombardment, 157, Elsevier Sequoia S. A., Lausanne.Google Scholar
  7. Duggan, J. L. and W. L. Beck, L. Albrecht, L. Munz, J. D. Spaulding, 1972, Adv. X-Ray Analysis, 15, 407.Google Scholar
  8. Flocchini, R. G. and P. J. Feeney, R. J. Sommerville, T. A. Cahill, 1972, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 100, 397.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gordon, B. M. and H. W. Kraner, 1972, Trace substances in environmental health-V (ed. D. D. Hemphill; University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri) p. 231.Google Scholar
  10. Gordon, B. M. and H. W. Kranerm, 1972, “On the development of a system for trace element analysis in the environment by charged particle x-ray fluorescence”, Chemical Analysis by Charged Particle Beams, 181; Elsevier Sequois S. A, Lausanne, J. Radioanal. Chem. 12, 39.Google Scholar
  11. Lochmuller, C. H. and I. Galbraith, R. Walter, J. Joyce, 1972, Anal. Lett. 5, 943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Perry, S. and F. P. Brady, T. A. Cahill, R. Flocchini, N. S. P. King, R. Wyrick, 1972, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 17, 120.Google Scholar
  13. Purser, K. H., 1972, The University of Rochester, reprint UR-NSRL-72.Google Scholar
  14. Rudolph, H. and J. K. Kliwer, J. J. Kraushaar, R. A. Restinen, W. R. Smythe, May 1972, Proc. 18th Ann. ISA Analysis Instrumentation Symp. (San Francisco) p. 151.Google Scholar
  15. Rudolph, H. and R. A. Ristinen, W. R. Smythe, A. Alfrey, S. R. Contiguglia, 1972, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 17, 548.Google Scholar
  16. Stupin, D. M. and P. Fintz, A. Gallmann, H. E. Gove, G. Guillaume, A. Pape, J. C. Sens, October 1972, Rapport interne, CRB-LPNIN 7202, Centre de Recherches Nucleaires et Universite Louis Pasteur, Strasburg, France.Google Scholar
  17. Verba, J.W., J.W. Sunier, B.T. Wright, I. Slaus, A.B. Holman, J. Kulleck “Chemical Analysis with Charged Particle Beams”, 1972, 171 Elsevier Sequois S.A., Lausanne, and J. Radioanal. Chem. 12.Google Scholar

Bibliography 1973

  1. Barnes, B.K., L.E. Beghian, G.H.R. Kegel, S.C. Mathur, P.W. Quinn, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. No. EO 13, Wash., D.C., 4/73 1973Google Scholar
  2. Bond, CD., L.S. August, P. Shapiro, C.M. Davisson, W.I. McGarry, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. No. EO 12, Wash., D.C, 4/73Google Scholar
  3. Brady, F.P., T.A. Cahill, “Development of X-ray Environmental Instrumentation”, U.Calif., Davis, report CNL-172 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Cahill, T.A., P.J. Feeney, “Contribution of Freeway Traffic to Airborne Particulate Matter”, U.Calif., Davis report CNL-169, to the California Air Resources Board, June, 1973 (N.T.I.S.)Google Scholar
  5. Cahill, T.A., R.G. Flocchini, P.J. Feeney, “Alpha Particle Excitation using Cyclotrons”, Transactions American Nuclear Society 17, 102 (1973)Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, J.A., Advan. X-ray Anal. 16, (1973);Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, J.A., Nucl. Instr. and Methods 106, 525 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hansen, J.S., J.C McGeorge, D. Nix, W.D. Schmidt-Ott, I. Unus, R.W. Fink, Nucl. Instr. and Methods 106, 365 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herman, A.W., L.A. McNelles, J.L. Campbell, J. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 24, 677 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herman, A.W., L.A. McNelles, J.L. Campbell, Nucl. Instr. and Methods 110, 429 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nelson, J.W., I. Williams, T.B. Johansson, R.E. Van Grieken, K.R. Chapman, J.W. Winchester, IEEE Nuclear Science, November, 1973Google Scholar
  12. Perry, S.K., F.P. Brady, Nucl. Instr. and Methods 108, 389 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thibeau, H., J. Stadel, W. Cline, T.A. Cahill, Nucl. Instr. and Methods 111, 615 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Umbarger, C. J. and R. C Bearse, D. A. Close, J. J. Malanify, 1973, Advan. X-Ray Anal. 16, 102–110.Google Scholar
  15. Valkovic, V. and D. Miljanic, R. M. Wheeler, R. B. Leibert, T. Zabel, G. C. Phillips, 1973, Nature, 243, 543.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zabel, T., 1973, M. Sc. Thesis, Rice University. 1974Google Scholar

Bibliography 1974

  1. Akselsson, R. and R. B. Johansson, 1974, Z. Physik 266, 245.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azevedo, J. and R. T. Flocchini, T. A. Cahill, P. R. Stout, 1974, J. Environ. Quality 3, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cahill, T. A., R. G. Flocchini, P. J. Feeney and D. J. Shadoan, Nucl. Instr. and Methods 120, 193 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camp, D. C. and J. A. Cooper, J. R. Rhodes, 1974, X-ray Spectrometry 3, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, J. L. and A. W. Herman, L. A. McNelles, R. A. Willoughby, 1974, “Advances in X-ray analysis”, Pergamon Press, Vol. 17.Google Scholar
  6. Folkmann, F. and C. Gaarde, T. Huus, K. Kemp, 1974, “Proton Induced X-ray Emission as a Tool for Trace Element Analysis”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 116, 487.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harrisson, J. and R. Eldred, 1974, “Advances in X-ray analysis”, Pergamon Press, Vol 17.Google Scholar
  8. Mandler, J. W., and R. A. Semmler, “Trace Element Analysis Using Charged Particles”, Nuclear Methods in Environmental Research (ANS), Columbia, Missouri (1974).Google Scholar
  9. Robinson, D. C, N. E. Whitehead and G. E. Coote, “Some Analysis of Air Filters by Proton-Induced X-ray Fluorescence”, Inst. of Nuclear Science, R-131, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. (1974).Google Scholar
  10. Thomas, J. P. and L. Porte, J. Engerran, J. C. Viala, J. Tousseel, 1974, Nucl. Instr. & Methods 117, 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Valkovic, V. and R. B. Liebert, T. Zabel, H. T. Larson, D, Miljanic, R. M. Wheeler, G. C. Phillips, 1974, N.I.M. 114, 573.Google Scholar
  12. Walter, R. L. & R. D. Willis, W. F. Gutknecht, J. M, Joyce, 1974, Anal. Chem. 46, 843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas A. Cahill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, Institute of EcologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations