Advertisement

Man in the Ocean Environment: Performance

  • Charles W. Shilling
  • Margaret F. Werts
  • Nancy R. Schandelmeier

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to present information about man’s performance in an ocean environment, particularly as it contrasts with performance in a normal, dry-land, 1-atm, air environment. The kind of information selected for presentation is that based on experimentation as opposed to that from less formal sources. The strength of this choice is that information obtained by the scientific method can be assessed for confidence, reliability, and generality; the weakness is the piecemeal character of the information. Research results typically are not about holistic job performance by operational divers working in the ocean, but about a dimension of performance as affected by a characteristic of the ocean environment. Most often, several performance dimensions are measured as effects of variations in a single environmental characteristic. Researchers tend to work by varying an environmental characteristic, such as cold or atmospheric pressure, and recording a range of performance dimensions, such as manual dexterity, reaction time, and memory. The principal challenge of preparing this chapter, therefore, was to develop a framework for organizing the fragments of performance-oriented research information relevant to man in the sea.

Keywords

Skin Temperature Ocean Environment Manual Dexterity Perceptual Speed Finger Dexterity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adolfson, J. Deterioration of mental and motor functions in hyperbaric air. Scand. J. Psychol.6(1): 26–32 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adolfson, J. Human performance and behavior in hyperbaric environments. Acta. Psychol. Gothoburgensia6:1–74 (1967).Google Scholar
  3. Adolfson, J., and A. Muren. Air breathing at 13 atmospheres. Psychological and physiological observations. Forsvarsmedicin1:31–37 (Jan. 1965).Google Scholar
  4. Adolfson, J., L. Goldberg, and T. Berghage. Effects of increased ambient air pressures on standing steadiness in man. Aerosp. Med.43:520–524 (May 1972).Google Scholar
  5. Andersen, B. G. Diver performance measurement: underwater navigation and weight carrying capabilities. Groton, Conn., General Dynamics, Electric Boat Division, Tech. Rep. on Contract ONR N00014-67-CO447 (1968).Google Scholar
  6. Andersen, B. G., F. L. Allen, and J. C. Lamb. Diver performance measurement: Transporting neutrally buoyant objects manual movement by heavy objects. Groton, Conn., General Dynamics, Electric Boat Division (1969).Google Scholar
  7. Bachrach, A. J., and P. B. Bennett. Tremor in diving. Aerosp. Med.44:613–623 (June 1973).Google Scholar
  8. Bachrach, A. J., D. R. Thorne, and K. J. Conda. Measurement of tremor in the Makai Range 520-foot saturation dive. Aerosp. Med.42:856–860 (Aug. 1971).Google Scholar
  9. Baddeley, A. D. Influence of depth on the manual dexterity of free divers: a comparison between open sea and pressure chamber testing. J. Appl. Psychol.50:81–85 (Feb. 1966a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baddeley, A. D. Diver performance and the interaction of stresses. In: Lythgoe, J. N., and J. D. Woods, eds. Underwater Association Report 1966–1967, pp. 35–46. Carshalton, England, T.G.W. Industrial and Research Promotions, for the Underwater Association of Malta (1966b).Google Scholar
  11. Baddeley, A. D., and N. C. Flemming. The efficiency of divers breathing oxygen-helium. Ergonomics10:311–319 (May 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baddeley, A. D., J. W. Defigueredo, J. W. H. Curtis, and A. N. Williams. Nitrogen narcosis and performance under water. Ergonomics11:157–164 (Mar. 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bain, E. C., and T. E. Berghage. Preliminary evaluation of SINDBAD tests. U. S. Navy Exp. Diving Unit (Oct. 1973).Google Scholar
  14. Barrett, F. B., and J. T. Quirk. Diver performance using handtools and hand-held pneumatic tools. U. S. Nav. Civ. Eng. Lab., Rep. NCEL-R-653 (Dec. 1969).Google Scholar
  15. Behnke, A. R., R. M. Thomson, and E. P. Motley. The psychologic effects from breathing air at 4 atmospheres pressure. Amer. J. Physiol.112:554–558 (July 1935).Google Scholar
  16. Bennett, G. K. Hand Tool Dexterity Test, Manual of Directions, revised edition. New York, The Psychological Corporation (1965).Google Scholar
  17. Bennett, P. B. Psychometric impairment in men breathing oxygen-helium at increased pressures. Alverstoke, U. K., Roy. Nav. Physiol. Lab., Med. Res. Counc., Rep. 251 (1965).Google Scholar
  18. Bennett, P. B. The Aetiology of Compressed Air Intoxication and Inert Gas Narcosis. Oxford, Pergamon Press (1966).Google Scholar
  19. Bennett, P. B. Performance impairment in deep diving due to nitrogen, helium, neon and oxygen. In: Lambertsen, C. J., ed. Underwater Physiology. Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Underwater Physiology, March 1966, Washington, D. C., pp. 327–340. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins (1967).Google Scholar
  20. Bennett, P. B., and E. J. Towse. Performance efficiency of men breathing oxygen-helium at depths between 100 feet and 1500 feet. Aerosp. Med.42:1147–1156 (Nov. 1971).Google Scholar
  21. Bennett, P. B., E. C. Poulton, A. Carpenter, and M. J. Catton. Efficiency at sorting cards in air and a 20 percent oxygen-helium mixture at depths down to 100 feet and in enriched air. Ergonomics10:53–62 (Jan. 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bennett, P. B., K. N. Ackles, and V. J. Cripps. Effects of hyperbaric nitrogen and oxygen on auditory evoked responses in man. Aerosp. Med.40:521–525 (May 1969).Google Scholar
  23. Biersner, R. J., and B. J. Cameron. Cognitive performance during a 1000-foot helium dive. Aerosp. Med.41:918–920 (Aug. 1970a).Google Scholar
  24. Biersner, R. J., and B. J. Cameron. Memory impairment during a deep helium dive. Aerosp. Med.41:658–661 (June 1970).Google Scholar
  25. Bowen, H. M. Diver performance and the effects of cold. Hum. Factors10:445–464 (June 1968).Google Scholar
  26. Bowen, H. M., B. Andersen, and D. Promisel. Studies of divers’ performance during the SEALAB II project. Hum. Factors8:183–199 (June 1966).Google Scholar
  27. Braithwaite, W. R., T. E. Berghage, and J. H. Crothers. Postural equilibrium and vestibular response at 49.5 ATA. Undersea Biomed. Res., in press.Google Scholar
  28. Brown, J. L. Orientation to the vertical during water immersion. Aerosp. Med.32:209–217 (Mar. 1961).Google Scholar
  29. Bühlmann, A. A., M. Matthys, G. Overrath, P. B. Bennett, D. H. Elliott, and S. P. Gray. Saturation exposures at 31 ata in an oxygen-helium atmosphere with excursions to 36 ata. Aerosp. Med.41:394–402 (Apr. 1970).Google Scholar
  30. Cameron, B. J., and M. G. Every. An integrated measurement system for the study of human performance in the underwater environment. Operator’s Handbook. Falls Church, Va., BioTechnology, Inc. (1970).Google Scholar
  31. Christianson, R. A., G. Weltman, and G. H. Egstrom. Thrust forces in underwater swimming. Hum. Factors7:561–568 (Dec. 1965).Google Scholar
  32. Clark, R. E. The limiting hand skin temperature for unaffected manual performance in the cold. J. Appl. Psychol.45:193–194 (June 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Clarke, R. S. J., R. F. Hellon, and A. R. Lind. The duration of sustained contractions of the human forearm at different muscle temperatures. J. Physiol. (London) 143:454–473 (Oct. 1958).Google Scholar
  34. Deppe, A. H. Overload and sensory deprivation: time estimation in novice divers. Percept. Mot. Skills29:481–482 (Oct. 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Diefenbach, W. S. The ability of submerged subjects to sense the gravitational vertical. Buffalo, N. Y., Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory (1961).Google Scholar
  36. Dunn, J. M. Psychomotor functioning while breathing varying partial pressures of oxygennitrogen. Brooks Air Force Base, Tex., Sch. Aerosp. Med., Rep. 62-82 (1962).Google Scholar
  37. Dusek, E. R. Manual performance and finger temperatures as a function of ambient temperature. U. S. Army, Natick Lab., Environ. Protection Res. Div., Tech. Rep. EP-68 (1957).Google Scholar
  38. Egstrom, G. H., G. Weltman, A. D. Baddeley, W. J. Cuccaro, and M. A. Willis. Underwater work performance and work tolerance. Los Angeles, Univ. Cal., Sch. Eng. Appl. Sci., Rep. UCLA-ENG-7243 (July 1972).Google Scholar
  39. Egstrom, G. H., G. Weltman, W. J. Cuccaro, and M. A. Willis. Underwater work performance and work tolerance. Los Angeles, Univ. Cal., Sch. Eng. Appl. Sci., Rep. UCLA-ENG-7318 (1973).Google Scholar
  40. Fleishman, E. A. Dimensional analysis of psychomotor abilities. J. Exp. Psychol.48:437–454 (Dec. 1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fleishman, E. A. Dimensional analysis of movement reactions. J. Exp. Psychol.55:438–453 (May 1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fleishman, E. A., and W. E. Hempel. A factor analysis of dexterity tests. Personnel Psychol.7:15–32 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fowler, B., and K. N. Ackles. Narcotic effects in man of breathing 80-20 argon-oxygen and air under hyperbaric conditions. Aerosp. Med.43:1219–1224 (Nov. 1972).Google Scholar
  44. French, J. W., R. B. Ekstrom, and L. A. Price. Manual for Kit of Reference Tests for Cognitive Factors. Princeton, N. J., Educational Testing Service (June 1963).Google Scholar
  45. Gaydos, H. F. Effect on complex manual performance of cooling the body while maintaining the hands at normal temperatures. J. Appl. Physiol12:373–376 (May 1958).Google Scholar
  46. Gaydos, H. F., and E. R. Dusek. Effects of localized hand cooling versus total body cooling on manual performance. J. Appl. Physiol12:377–380 (May 1958).Google Scholar
  47. Gunderson, E. K. E., and P. D. Nelson. Criterion measures for extremely isolated groups. Personnel Psychol.19:67–80 (Spring 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Helmreich, R. Patterns of aquanaut behavior. In: Miller, J. W., J. G. VanDerwalker, and R. A. Waller, eds. TEKTITE II. Scientists-in-the-Sea, pp. VIII–30–VIII–45. Washington, D. C., U. S. Department of the Interior (1971a).Google Scholar
  49. Helmreich, R. The TEKTITE II human behavior program. Austin, Tex., Univ. Tex., Dept. Psychol., Social PsychoL Lab., Rep. TR-14 (Mar. 15, 1971).Google Scholar
  50. Horvath, S. M., and A. Freedman. The influence of cold upon the efficiency of man. J. Aviation Med.18:158–164 (Feb. 1947).Google Scholar
  51. Hunter, J., E. H. Kerr, and M. G. Whilans. The relation between joint stiffness upon exposure to cold and the characteristics of synovial fluid. Can. J. Med. Sci.30:367–377 (Oct. 1952).Google Scholar
  52. Kiessling, R. J., and C. H. Maag. Performance impairment as a function of nitrogen narcosis. J. Appl. Psychol.46:91–95 (Apr. 1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kleitman, N., and D. P. Jackson. Body temperature and performance under different routines. J. Appl. Physiol.3:309–328 (Dec. 1950).Google Scholar
  54. Leblanc, J. S. Impairment of manual dexterity in the cold. Manitoba, Can., Def. Res. Northern Lab., Rep. DRNL 4/55 (1955).Google Scholar
  55. Lockhart, J. M. Effects of body and hand cooling on complex manual performance. J. Appl. Psychol.50:57–59 (Feb. 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lockhart, J. M. Extreme body cooling and psychomotor performance. Ergonomics11:249–260 (May 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mackworth, N. H. Finger numbness in very cold winds. J. Appl. Physiol.5:533–543 (Mar. 1953).Google Scholar
  58. Mann, C. W., and G. E. Passey. The perception of the vertical: V. Adjustment of the postural vertical as a function of the magnitude of postural tilt and duration of exposure. J. Exp. Psychol.41:108–113 (Feb. 1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Margaria, R. Wide range investigations of acceleration in man and animals. J. Aviation Med.29:855–871 (Dec. 1958).Google Scholar
  60. Mcginnis, J. M., J. M. Lockhart, and C. K. Bensel. A human factors evaluation of cold-wet handwear. U. S. Army, Natick Lab., Tech. Rep. 73-22-PP (Apr. 1972).Google Scholar
  61. Miller, J. W., R. Radloff, H. M. Bowen, and R. L. Helmreich. The SEALAB II human behavior program. In: Pauli, D. C., and G. P. Clapper, eds. Project SEALAB report. An experimental 45-day undersea saturation dive at 205 feet, pp. 245-271. Off. Nav. Res. Rep. ACR-124 (Mar. 8, 1967).Google Scholar
  62. Mills, A. W. Finger numbness and skin temperature. J. Appl. Physiol.9:447–450 (Nov. 1956).Google Scholar
  63. Mills, A. W. Tactile sensitivity in the cold. In: Fisher, F. R., ed. Protection and Functioning of the Hands in Cold Climates, pp. 76–86. Washington, D. C, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council (1957).Google Scholar
  64. Morrison, J. B. Oxygen uptake studies of divers when fin swimming with maximum effort at depths of 6–176 feet. Aerosp. Med.44:1120–1129 (Oct. 1973).Google Scholar
  65. Morton, R., and K. A. Provins. Finger numbness after acute local exposure to cold. J. Appl. Physiol.15:149–154 (Jan. 1960).Google Scholar
  66. Nelson, J. G. The effect of water immersion and body position upon perception of the gravitational vertical. U. S. Nav. Air Devel. Cent., Rep. NADC-MR-6709 (1967).Google Scholar
  67. Norman, D. G. Force application in simulated zero gravity. Hum. Factors11:489–505 (Oct. 1969).Google Scholar
  68. Nowlis, D., H. H. Waiters, and E. C. Wortz. Habitability assessment program. In: TEKTITE II. Scientists-in-the-Sea, pp. VIII–68–VIII–89. Washington, D. C., U. S. Department of the Interior (1971).Google Scholar
  69. Nowlis, D. P., E. C. Wortz, and H. Waiters. TEKTITE II habitability program. Los Angeles, Cal., Air Research Manufacturing Co., Rep. 71-6192 (Jan. 14, 1972).Google Scholar
  70. O’Reilly, J. P. Behavioral effectiveness at 16 ata. Honolulu, Univ. Hawaii, Sea Grant Tech. Rep. UNIHI-SEAGRANT-TR-73-01 (Apr. 1973).Google Scholar
  71. Parker, J. W. Performance effects of increased ambient pressure. II. Helium-oxygen saturation and excursion dive to a simulated depth of 110 feet. U. S. Nav. Submar. Med. Cent. Rep. SMRL 596 (Sept. 1969).Google Scholar
  72. Payne, R. B. Tracking proficiency as a function of thermal balance. J. Appl. Physiol.14:387–389 (May 1959).Google Scholar
  73. Peacock, L. J. A field study of rifle aiming steadiness and serial reaction performance as affected by thermal stress and activity. U. S. Army Med. Res. Lab., Rep. 231 (1956).Google Scholar
  74. Radloff, R., and R. Helmreich. Groups under Stress: Psychological Research in SEALAB II. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts (1968).Google Scholar
  75. Radloff, R., R. Mach, and N. Zill. Behavioral program. In: Pauli, D. C., and H. A. Cole, eds. Project TEKTITE I, pp. A-13-A-47. Off. Nav. Res., Rep. DR-153 (Jan. 1970).Google Scholar
  76. Reilly, R. E., and B. J. Cameron. An integrated measurement system of the study of human performance in the underwater environment. Falls Church, Va., Bio-Technology, Inc. (1968).Google Scholar
  77. Ross, H. E., S. D. Crickmar, N. V. Sills, and E. P. Owen. Orientation to the vertical in free divers. Aerosp. Med.40:728–732 (July 1969).Google Scholar
  78. Ross, H. E., D. J. Dickinson, and B. J. Jupp. Geographical orientation under water. Hum. Factors12:13–23 (Feb. 1970).Google Scholar
  79. Shilling, C. W., and W. W. Willgrube. Quantitative study of mental and neuromuscular reactions as influenced by increased air pressure. U. S. Nav. Med. Bull.35:373–380 (Oct. 1937).Google Scholar
  80. Stang, P. R., and E. L. Wiener. Diver performance in cold water. Hum. Factors12:391–399 (Aug. 1970).Google Scholar
  81. Streimer, I. A study of work-producing characteristics of underwater operations. Downey, Cal., North American Rockwell Corp., SsaCe Division, Rep. SD 68-347 (1969a).Google Scholar
  82. Streimer, I. A study of work-producing characteristics of underwater operations as a function of depth. Downey, Cal., North American Rockwell, Space Division, Rep. SD 69-712 (Nov. 1969b).Google Scholar
  83. Streimer, I., D. P. W. Turner, K. Volkmer, and P. Pryor. Experimental study of diver performance in manual and mental tasks at 66 feet. San Diego, Cal., Man Factors, Inc., Rep. MFI 71-115 (Sept. 1971).Google Scholar
  84. Streimer, I., D. P. W. Turner, K. Volkmer, and P. Pryor. A study of forced-pace work characteristics at a 33-foot working depth. San Diego, Cal., Man Factors, Inc., Rep. MFI 72-123 (Sept. 1972).Google Scholar
  85. Stroop, J. R. Interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol.18:643–661 (Dec. 1935).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Summitt, J. K., J. S. Kelley, J. M. Herron, and H. A. Saltzman. Joint U. S. Navy-Duke University 1000-foot saturation dive. U. S. Navy Exp. Diving Unit, Rep. NEDU 3-69 (1969).Google Scholar
  87. Teichner, W. H. Manual dexterity in the cold. J. Appl. Physiol.11:333–338 (Nov. 1957).Google Scholar
  88. Teichner, W. H. Reaction time in the cold. J. Appl. Psychol.42:54–59 (Feb. 1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Teichner, W. H. Interaction of behavioral and physiological stress reactions. Psychol. Rev.75:271–291 (July 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Teichner, W. H., and J. L. Kobrick. Effects of prolonged exposure to low temperature on visualmotor performance. J. Exp. Psychol.49:122–126 (Feb. 1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Teichner, W. H., and R. F. Wehrkamp. Visual-motor performance as a function of short duration ambient temperature. J. Exp. Psychol.47:447–450 (June 1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tresansky, G. J. The NMRI Mark III Mod. I tremor device. U. S. Nav. Med. Res. Inst., Rep. 2 (May 1973).Google Scholar
  93. U. S. Navy. U. S. Navy Diving Manual. Washington, D. C., U. S. Navy Department (Mar. 1970) (NAVSHIPS 0994-001-9010).Google Scholar
  94. Vaughan, W. S., Jr. and B. G. Andersen. Effects of long-duration cold exposure on performance of tasks in naval inshore warfare operations. Landover, Md., Oceanautics, Inc., Rep. on Contract ONR-N00014-73-C-0309 (Nov. 1973).Google Scholar
  95. Vaughan, W. S., Jr. and A. S. Mavor. Diver performance in controlling a wet submersible during four-hour exposures to cold water. Hum. Factors14:173–180 (Apr. 1972).Google Scholar
  96. Vaughan, W. S., Jr. and J. S. Swider. Crew performance in swimmer delivery vehicle operations (U). Landover, Md., Whittenburg, Vaughan Associates, Inc. (May 1972)Google Scholar
  97. Webb, P. Rewarming after diving in cold water Aerosp. Med.44:1152–1157 (Oct. 1973).Google Scholar
  98. Wechsler, D. The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Weitz, J. Vibratory sensitivity as a function of skin temperature. J. Exp. Psychol.28:21–36 (Jan. 1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Weltman, G., and G. H. Egstrom. Perceptual narrowing in novice divers. Hum. Factors8:499–506 (Dec. 1966).Google Scholar
  101. Weltman, G., G. H. Egstrom, R. E. Elliott, and H. S. Stevenson. Underwater work measurement techniques: initial studies. Los Angeles, Univ. Cal., Sch. Eng. Appl. Sci., Rep. on Contract ONR N00014-67-A-0111-0007 (1968).Google Scholar
  102. Weltman, G., R. A. Christianson, and G. H. Egstrom. Effects of environment and experience on underwater work performance. Hum. Factors12:587–598 (Dec. 1970).Google Scholar
  103. Weltman, G., G. H. Egstrom, M. A. Willis, and W. Cuccaro. Underwater work measurement techniques: final report. Los Angeles, Univ. Cal., Sch. Eng. Appl. Sci., Rep. on Contract ONR-N00014-67-0111-0007 (1971a).Google Scholar
  104. Weltman, G., J. E. Smith, and G. H. Egstrom. Perceptual narrowing during simulated pressurechamber exposure. Hum. Factors13:99–107 (Apr. 1971b).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles W. Shilling
    • 1
  • Margaret F. Werts
    • 1
  • Nancy R. Schandelmeier
    • 1
  1. 1.Science Communication Division, Department of Medical and Public Affairs The Medical CenterThe George Washington UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations