!Kung Population Structure

  • Henry Harpending
  • Trefor Jenkins


Two currently popular approaches to the description and analysis of local genetic variation in human populations may be called the distance approach and the structure approach.


Population Structure Gene Frequency Census Size Binomial Sampling Migration Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. AZEVEDO, E. et al. 1969. Distance and Kinship in Northeast Brazil. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 21:1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. BARRAI, I. 1971. Subdivision and Inbreeding. Letter to the Editor. Am. J. Hun. Genet. 23:95–96.Google Scholar
  3. BODMER, W. F. and L. L. CAVALLI-SFORZA. 1968. A migration matrix model for the study of random genetic drift. Genetics 2:565–592.Google Scholar
  4. CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. 1969. Genetics of Human Populations. Proc. XII Int. Cong. Genetics. Tokyo, pp. 405–417.Google Scholar
  5. CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. and W. F. BODMER. 1971. The Genetics of Human Populations. W. F. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  6. FRIEDLAENDER, J. S. 1971. Isolation by distance in Bougainville. Proc. Net. Acad. Sci. 68:704–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. HARPENDING, H. C. 1971. Inference in Population Structure Studies. Letter to the Editor: in press. Am. J. Hum. Genet. (September).Google Scholar
  8. IMAIZUMI, Y. et al. 1970. Isolation by distance in artificial populations. Gemtics 66:569–582.Google Scholar
  9. KENDALL, M. G. and A. STUART. 1969. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Volume L (3rd edition). Hafner.Google Scholar
  10. LEE, R. B. 1965. Subsistence Ecology of the fKung Bushmen. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  11. LI, C. C. and D. G. HORVITZ. 1953. Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 5: 107–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. MARSHALL, L. 1960. !Kung Bushman bands. Africa 29:335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MORTON, N. E. et al. 1968. Bioassay of population structure under isolation by distance. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 20:411–419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. MORTON, N. E. et al. 1971. Bioassay of Kinship. (This volume).Google Scholar
  15. SMITH, C. A. B. 1969. Local fluctuations in gene frequencies. Ann. Hun. Genetics 32:251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. THOMAS, E. M. 1959. The Harmless People. Google Scholar
  17. WORKMAN, P. L. and J. D. Niswander. 1970. Population studies on southwestern Indian Tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 22:24–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. YASUDA, N. 1968a. An extension of Wahlund’s principle to evaluate mating type frequency. Am. J. Hum. Senet. 20:1–23.Google Scholar
  19. YASUDA, N. 1968b. Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient from phenotype frequencies by a method of maximum likelihood scoring. Biometrics 24:915–935.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry Harpending
    • 1
    • 2
  • Trefor Jenkins
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Human Sero-Genetics Research UnitSouth African Institute for Medical ResearchJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations