Advertisement

Coincidence of Modified Crossover Distribution with Modified Synaptonemal Complexes

  • Peter B. Moens

Abstract

In eukaryotes the systematic nonoccurrence of reciprocal exchange in competent chromosomes is not predictable from molecular models of conversion or exchange. Modifications of crossover distribution include positive interference, species-specific limitations of crossovers per cell or per bivalent, the localization of crossovers in specific chromsosome segments, and the abolishment of crossovers in meiocytes of one or the other sex of members of one species. In each case the particular regulation of recombination represents an adaptation in the evolutionary strategy of the species. Unlike the process of recombination itself, these adaptations are often of recent origin, and differences occur between the species of a single genus or family.

Keywords

Nuclear Envelope Synaptonemal Complex Meiotic Prophase Lateral Element Terminal Segment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Counce, S. J. and G. F. Meyer. 1973. Differentiation of the synaptonemal complex and the kinetochore in Locusta spermatocytes studied by whole mount electron microscopy. Chromosoma 44: 231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jones, G. H. 1973. Light and electron microscope studies of chromosome pairing in relation to chiasma localization in Stethophyma grossum (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Chromosoma 42: 145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Meyer, G. F. 1964. A possible correlation between the submicro-scopic structure of meiotic chromosomes and crossing over. In (M. Titlbach, ed.) Electron Microscopy 1964, Vol. B. pp. 461.Google Scholar
  4. Moens, P. B. 1969. The fine structure of meiotic chromosome pairing in the triploid Lilivum tigrinum. J. Cell Biol. 40: 273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Moens, P. B. 1972. Fine structure of chromosome coiling at meiotic prophase in Rhoeo discolor. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 14: 801.Google Scholar
  6. Moens, P. B. 1973. Mechanisms of chromosome synapsis at meiotic prophase. Int. Rev. Cytol. 35: 117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Moses, M. J. 1968. Synaptinemal complex. Ann. Rev. Genet. 2: 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rizet, G. and C. Englemann. 1949. Contribution à l’étude génétique d’n Ascomycète tetrasporé: Podospora anserina. Rev. Cytol. Biol. Vég. 2: 202.Google Scholar
  9. Stadler, D. R., A. M. Towe and J. L. Rossignol. 1970. Intragenetic recombination of ascospore color mutants in Ascobolus and its relationship to the segregation of outside markers. Genetics 66: 429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Stern, H. and Y. Hotta. 1973. Biochemical controls of meiosis. Ann. Rev. Genet. 7: 37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Westergaard, M. and D. von Wettstein. 1972. The synaptinemal complex. Ann. Rev. Genet. 6: 71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wimber, D. E. 1968. The nuclear cytology of bivalents and ring-forming Rhoeos and their hybrids. Amer. J. Bot. 55: 572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zickler, D. 1973. Fine structure of chromosome pairing in ten Ascomycetes: meiotic and premeiotic synaptonemal complexes. Chromosoma 40: 401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter B. Moens
    • 1
  1. 1.York UniversityDownsviewCanada

Personalised recommendations