Advertisement

Marker Effects in Pneumococcal Transformation

  • Jean-Gérard Tiraby
  • Maurice S. Fox

Abstract

Genetic markers may be transferred from one pneumococcal strain to another as the result of exposure of competent recipient bacteria to double-stranded DNA isolated from donor bacteria. Several investigators have shown that markers representing single-site mutations can be divided into several classes according to the frequency with which those markers are represented among transformants. These mutations appear to fall into four classes, the distribution of which varies according to the loci analyzed (Lacks, 1966; Sirotnak and Hachtel, 1969; Tiraby and Sicard, 1973a). The two predominant classes of markers are those that yield a high frequency of transformants (HE, for high efficiency of integration) and those that yield a low frequency of transformants (LE, for an efficiency of integration about tenfold lower) (Ephrussi-Taylor et al., 1965; Ephrussi-Taylor and Gray, 1966). When a large number of spontaneous mutations within a given locus are analyzed, two more classes are observed, one corresponding to markers with a very high efficiency of integration (from 1.5- to 2-fold more efficient than HE markers) (VHE) and the other corresponding to markers with an intermediate efficiency (IE). VHE markers are about 20 times more efficient than LE markers.

Keywords

Replication Fork Integration Efficiency Pneumococcal Strain Endonucleolytic Cleavage Double Transformants 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, N. C. 1971. Inhibition of bacterial DNA replication by 6-(p-hydroxyphenylazo)-uracil: differential effect on repair and semi-conservative synthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Biol. 59: 1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cato, A. and W. R. Guild. 1968. Transformation and DNA size. I. Activity of fragments of defined size and a fit to a random double crossover model. J. Mol. Biol. 37: 157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ephrussi-Taylor, H. 1966. Genetic recombination in DNA-induced transformation of pneumococcus. IV. The pattern of transmission and phenotypic expression of high and low efficiency donor sites in the ami-A locus. Genetics 54 : 211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ephrussi-Taylor, H. and T. C. Gray. 1966. Genetic studies of re-combining DNA in pneumococcal transformation. J. Gen. Physiol. 49: 211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ephrussi-Taylor, H., A. M. Sicard and R. Kamen. 1965. Genetic recombination in DNA-induced transformation of pneumococcus. I. The problem of relative efficiency of transforming factors. Genetics 51: 455.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fox, M. S. and M. K. Allen. 1964. On the mechanism of deoxyribo-nucleate integration in pneumococcal transformation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 52: 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guerrini, F. and M. S. Fox. 1968. Effects of DNA repair in transformation-heterozygotes of pneumococcus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 59: 1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gurney, T. Jr. 1965. A minimum molecular weight for transforming DNA. Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
  9. Gurney, T. Jr. and M. S. Fox. 1968. Physical and genetic hybrids formed in bacterial transformation. J. Mol. Biol. 32: 83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lacks, S. 1966. Integration efficiency and genetic recombination in pneumococcal transformation. Genetics 53: 207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lacks, S. 1970. Mutants of Diploooocus pneumoniae that lack deoxyribonucleases and activities possibly pertinent to genetic transformation. J. Bacteriol. 101: 373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Louarn, J. M. 1970. Etude de la recombinaison genetique chez Diploooocus pneumoniae. Thesis, University of Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
  13. Louarn, J. M. and A. M. Sicard. 1968. Transmission of genetic information during transformation in Diplococous pneumoniae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 30: 683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shoemaker, N. B. and W. R. Guild. 1974. Destruction of low efficiency markers is a slow process occurring at the heteroduplex stage of transformation. Mol. Gen. Genet, in press.Google Scholar
  15. Sirotnak, F. M. and S. L. Hachtel. 1969. Increased dihydrofolate reductase synthesis in Diploooocus pneumoniae following translatable alteration of the structural gene. I. Genotype derivation and recombinational analyses. Genetics 61: 293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tiraby, J.-G., J.-P. Claverys and A. M. Sicard. 1973. Integration efficiency in DNA induced transformation of pneumococcus. I. A method of transformation in solid medium and its use for isolation of transformation-deficient and recombination-modified mutants. Genetics 75: 23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tiraby, J.-G. and M. S. Fox. 1973. Marker discrimination in transformation and mutation of pneumococcus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70: 3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tiraby, J.-G. and A. M. Sicard. 1973a. Integration efficiencies of spontaneous mutant alleles of amiA locus in pneumococcal transformation. J. Bacteriol. 116: 1130.Google Scholar
  19. Tiraby, J.-G. and A. M. Sicard. 1973b. Integration efficiency in DNA-induced transformation of pneumococcus. II. Genetic studies of a mutant integrating all the markers with a high efficiency. Genetics 75: 35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Gérard Tiraby
    • 1
  • Maurice S. Fox
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations