On the Role of Restriction Enzymes of Haemophilus in Transformation and Transfection

  • Rosa Gromkova
  • Sol H. Goodgal


For the past few years we have been studying the biological effects of restriction enzymes in Haemophilus (Gromkova and Goodgal, 1972; Goodgal and Gromkova, 1973a; Gromkova et al., 1973; Smith and Wilcox, 1970). It has been relatively easy to demonstrate the action of restriction enzymes on DNA in vitro; however, it is not so easy to demonstrate that these enzymes function in the same way in the cell. Although DNA restriction has been regarded as a process apart from the phenomenon of recombination, the ability of restriction enzymes to generate unique segments of DNA with specific ends indicates that these enzymes may play an essential role in the recombination process. The in vitro construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids by the use of restriction endonucleases supports this view (Morrow and Berg, 1972; Mertz and Davis, 1972; Cohen et al., 1973). In the experiments presented below, we have attempted to compare the actions of restriction enzymes of Haemophilus in vitro and in vivo and to draw some general conclusions about the specific restriction systems involved.


Restriction Enzyme Haemophilus Influenzae Influenzae Strain Restrictive Cell Efficient Transformation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boyer, H. 1971. DNA restriction and modification mechanisms in bacteria. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 25: 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caster, J. H., E. H. Postei and S. H. Goodgal. 1972. Competence mutants: Isolation of transformation deficient strains of Haemophilus influenzae. Nature 227: 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, S. N., A. Chang, H. Boyer and R. B. Helling. 1973. Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in vitro. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70: 3640.Google Scholar
  4. Goodgal, S. H. and R. Gromkova. 1973a. Separation of specific segments of transforming DNA after treatment with endodeoxyribo-nuclease. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70 : 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goodgal, S. and R. Gromkova. 1973b. The biological specificity of Haemophilus endodeoxyribonucleases which attack heterologous DNA. In (L. J. Archer, ed.) Bacterial Transformation. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  6. Gromkova, R., J. Bendler and S. H. Goodgal. 1973. Restriction and modification of bacteriophage S2 in Haemophilus influenzae. J. Bacterid. 114: 1151.Google Scholar
  7. Gromkova, R. and S. H. Goodgal. 1972. Action of Haemophilus endo-deoxyribonuclease on biologically active deoxyribonucleic acid. J. Bacterid. 109: 987.Google Scholar
  8. Mertz, J. and R. W. Davis. 1972. Cleavage of DNA by R1 restriction endonuclease generated cohesive ends. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69: 3370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Morrow, J. and P. Berg. 1972. Cleavage of simian virus 40 DNA at a unique site by a bacterial restriction enzyme. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69: 3365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Piekarowicz, A. and S. W. Glover. 1972. Host specificity of DNA in Haemophilus influenzae. The two restriction and modification systems in strain Ra. Mol. Gen. Genet. 116: 11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith, H. O. and K. W. Wilcox. 1970. A restriction enzyme from Haemophilus influenzae I. Purification and general properties. J. Mol. Biol. 51: 379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosa Gromkova
    • 1
  • Sol H. Goodgal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations