Adaptive Computer Aiding in Dynamic Decision Processes

  • Amos Freedy
  • Gershon Weltman


This report describes in brief a research program directed toward the application of adaptive computer techniques for aiding the human decision maker in dynamic decision processes. Aiding information of several types comes from the on-line acquisition of the decision maker’s value structure by a trainable computer system. A maximum-likelihood model of real-world behavior is used to predict environment-state transitions, and an expected utility model of decision-maker behavior is used to predict, evaluate, and modify or automate operator decisions. The overall system models information-acquisition strategy, as well as action choices. It is presently being implemented on an interactive minicomputer, and applied to a simulated intelligence operation involving surveillance of a mobile fishing fleet using sensors of varying costs and reliabilities. Research goals include experimental investigation of the factors which influence optimal decision aiding in complex, realistic and open intelligence-gathering and decision-making tasks. A major concern is to identify aiding techniques which best match the judgmental abilities of man with the discriminative capacity of an adaptive machine.


Decision Environment Linear Discriminant Function Adaptive Computer Fishing Fleet Expected Utility Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dawes, R.M., Graduate Admission; A Case Study, Oregon Research Institute, Tech. Report 10 (1), 1970.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Freedy, A., Hull, F.C., Lucaccini, L.F., and Lyman, J., A Computer-Based Learning System for Remote Manipulator Control, IEEE Trans, on S.M.C., SMC-1, 356–363, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Freedy, A., Weisbrod, R., and Weltman, G., “A Technique for Self-Optimization of Shared Man-Computer Decision and Control” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (to be held December 1973).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldberg, L.R., Man vs. Model of Man: A Rationale Plus Some Evidence for a Method of Improving Upon Clinical Inferences”, Psychological Bulletin, 73: 422–432, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Howell, W., Some Principles for the Design of Decision Systems A Review of Six Years of Research on a Command-Control System Simulation, AMRL-TR-67–136, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, September, 1967Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelly, C.W., and C.R. Peterson, Probability Estimates and Probabilistic Procedures in Current Intelligence Analysis, Report FSG 5047, Federal Systems Division, IBM Corp. Jan. 1971Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller, L.W., Kaplan, R.J., and Edwards, W., “JUDGE: A Value- Judgment-Based Tactical Command System”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 2, 329–374, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Minsky, M., and Papert, Perceptrons, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., 1969.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rapoport, A., “A Study of Human Control in a Stochastic Multistage Decision Task”, J. Math. Psych., 4: 18–32, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rouse, W.B., Cognitive Sources of Suboptimal Human Prediction, Ph.D. Dissertation MIT, Report DSR 70283–19, September, 1972.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Slagle, R.J., Artificial Intelligence, The Heuristic Programming Approach, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fischer, G.W., Multi-Dimensional Value Assessment For Decision Making, Engineering Psychology Lab., University of Michigan, Tech. Report 03–7230–2-T, 1972.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meisel, W.S., Computer-Oriented Approaches to Pattern Recognition, Academic Press, N.Y., 1972.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nilsson, N.J., Learning Machines, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rapoport, A., and T.S. Wallsten, Individual Decision Behavior, Annual Review of Psychology, 23: 131–176, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tversky, A., P. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein, Subjective Optimality: Conceptual Issues, Empirical Results, and Decision Aids, Office of Naval Research Conference on Applications of Decision and Information Processing Research, Monterey, California, October 4, 1972.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vaughan, W.S., Jr. and Anne Schumacher Mavor, “Behavioral Characteristics of Men in the Performance of Some Decision- Making Task Components”, Ergonomics, 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amos Freedy
    • 1
  • Gershon Weltman
    • 1
  1. 1.Perceptronics, Inc.Woodland HillsUSA

Personalised recommendations