Advertisement

Abstract

The assessment of the current status and prospects for the control of houseflies is partly based on the literature, but primarily on 30 years of personal experience in housefly control in temperate Denmark and on visits to many parts of the world, including tropical and subtropical areas, where I observed and discussed control problems.

Keywords

Insecticide Resistance Musca Domestica Arthropod Predator Piperonyl Butoxide Danish Farm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Gawaad, A.A.W. and El-Gayar, F.H. (1972) Housefly control in Alexandria and its effect on the prevalence of certain summer diseases, Z. Ang. Ent., 71, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arevad, K. (1968–1969) Laboratory investigations on the behaviour of newly emerged houseflies, Governt. Pest. Inf. Lab., Denmark, Ann. Report 1967 (1968): 56-58, 1968 (1969): 54-55Google Scholar
  3. Arevad, K. (1972) The orientation of newly emerged houseflies, 13 Int. Congr. Ent. Moscow 1968, 3, 117.Google Scholar
  4. Ascher, K.R.S. (1961) Houseflies in Israel. III. Some observations at breeding sites in rural areas, and considerations about the influence of Israeli manure handling methods, on housefly breeding, Z. Ang. Ent., 48, 115–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austen, E.E. (1926) The Houseflya British Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Econ. Ser., No. 1a.Google Scholar
  6. Axtell, R.C. (1963a) Acarina occurring in animal manure, Ann. Ent. Soc. Am., 56, 628–633.Google Scholar
  7. Axtell, R.C. (1963b) Manure inhabiting Macrochelidae predaceous on the housefly, Adv. Acarology, 1, 55–59.Google Scholar
  8. Axtell, R.C. (1963c) Effect of Macrochelidae on housefly production from dairy cattle manure, J. econ. Ent., 56, 317–321.Google Scholar
  9. Axtell, R.C. (1968) Integrated housefly control: Populations of fly larvae and predaceous mites, Macrocheles muscaedomesticae, in poultry manure after larvicide treatment, J. econ. Ent., 61, 245–249.Google Scholar
  10. Axtell, R.C. (1969) Macrochelidae as biological control agents for synanthropic flies, Proc. 2nd Int. Congr. Acarol. Nottingham, 401-416.Google Scholar
  11. Axtell, R.C. (1970a) Integrated fly-control program for caged-poultry houses, J. econ. Ent., 63, 400–405.Google Scholar
  12. Axtell, R.C. (1970b) Fly control in caged-poultry houses: Comparison of larviciding and integrated control programs, J. econ. Ent., 63, 1734–1737.Google Scholar
  13. Axtell, R.C. (1971) Ultralowvolume aerial sprays for the control of Hippelates gnats and other flies, J. Georgia Entomot. Soc., 6, 101–105.Google Scholar
  14. Bailey, D.L., LaBrecque, G.C. and Bishop, P.M. (1967) Residual sprays for the control of houseflies, Musca domestica, in dairy barns, Fla. Entomol., 50, 161–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bailey, D.L., LaBrecque, G.C. and Whitfield, T.L. (1970a) Insecticides in dry sugar baits for control of houseflies in Florida dairy barns, J. econ. Ent., 63, 2000–2001.Google Scholar
  16. Bailey, D.L., LaBrecque, G.C. and Whitfield, T.L. (1970b) Resistance of houseflies (Diptera: Muscidae) to dimethoate and ronnel in Florida, Fla. Entomol., 53, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bailey, D.L., LaBrecque, G.C. and Whitfield, T.L. (1971) Resistance of houseflies (Diptera: Muscidae) in Florida to trichlorfon and dichlorovos formulated in sugar baits, Can. Entomol., 103, 853–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Balan, N.K. (1970) On the question of changes in the susceptibility of Musca domestica to chlorofos as a stomach poison, Med. Parazit. (Mosk.), 39, 491–497.Google Scholar
  19. Bath, S.S. and Stalker, J.M. (1970) A survey of Canadian populations of the housefly for resistance to insecticides, J. econ. Ent.., 63, 1947–1950.Google Scholar
  20. Bennett, F.D. and Legner, E.F. (1967) Memorandum on the possibilities of biological control of the muscid flies by hymenopterous parasites, WHO/VBC/67.22: 1-10 (Unpublished document).Google Scholar
  21. Brady, U.E. Jr., Meifert, D.W. and LaBrecque, G.F. (1966) Residual sprays for the control of houseflies in field tests, J. econ. Ent., 59, 1522–1523.Google Scholar
  22. Brown, A.W.A. and Pal, R. (1971) Insecticides resistance in arthropods, WHO Monograph Series No. 38, 2nd edit. (Geneva), 491 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Bushland, R.C. (1971) Sterility principle for insect control. Historical development and recent innovations. Approaches to housefly control. In: Sterility principle for insect control or eradication: 8–11, Internat. Atom Energy Agency, Vienna, STI/PUB 1265, 542 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Campion, D.G. (1972) Insect chemosterilants: A review, Bull ent. Res., 61, 577–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carlson, D.A., Mayer, M.S., Silhacek, D.L., James, J.D., Morton Beroza, Bierl, B.A. (1971) Sex attractant pheromone of the housefly: Isolation, identification and synthesis, Science, 174, 76–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. C D C (1972) Public health pesticides, Pest Control, 40, 35–65.Google Scholar
  27. Davies, M.S. (1966) Field trials with synergized pyrethrins in the Todd insecticidal fog applicator (TIFA), Pyrethrum Post, 8(4), 18–22.Google Scholar
  28. Dobson, R.C., Kurz, F.W. (1970) Control of houseflies in swine-finishing units by improved methods of waste disposal, J. econ. Ent., 63, 171–174.Google Scholar
  29. Duport, M., Combiesco, L. and Enesco, A. (1968) Traitement experimental de l’espece Musca domestica par du thiotepa, sur le terrain, Arch. roum. Path. exp., 27, 707–714.Google Scholar
  30. Duport, M., Combiesco, I. and Enescu, A. (1972) Traitement experimental de l’espece Musca domestica L. par du thiotepa sur le terrain, 13 Int. Congr. Ent., Moscow 1968, 3, 419–421.Google Scholar
  31. Döhring, E. (1966) Zur Wirksamkeit und Anwendungstechnik von Fliegenstreifen, Z. ang. Zool., 53, 95–121.Google Scholar
  32. Eastwood, R.E., Kada, J.M., Schoenburg, R.B. and Brydon, H.W. (1967) Investigations on fly control by composting poultry manures, J. econ. Ent. 60, 88–89.Google Scholar
  33. Enan, O.H. (1970) Susceptibility of housefly Musca domestica var. vicina to some insecticides in Alexandria area, U.A.R., J. Egypt. Publ. Hlth. Ass., 45, 443–450.Google Scholar
  34. Eröss, J. and Mahunka, S. (1971) Investigations on coprophilous and stercoricolous macrochelids (Acari, Gamasina) in Hungary, as possible agent in the control of synanthropic flies, Parasit. Hung., 4, 215–226.Google Scholar
  35. Foster, G.C., Whitten, M.J., Prout, T. and Gill, R. (1972) Chromosome rearrangements for the control of insect pests, Science, 176, 875–880.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Funder, J.F. (1972) Fly control on farms with pyrethrum as the sole insecticide, Danish Pest Inf. Lab. Ann. Report for 1971, 32-33.Google Scholar
  37. Funder, J.F. (1973) Test of light traps for fly control on Danish farms, Danish Pest Inf. Lab., Ann. Report for 1972, 28-29.Google Scholar
  38. Georghiou, G.P. (1966) Distribution of insecticide-resistant house-flies on neighbouring farms, J. econ. Ent., 59, 341–346.Google Scholar
  39. Georghiou, G.P. and Bowen, W.R. (1966) An analysis of housefly resistance to insecticides in California, J. econ. Ent., 59, 204–214.Google Scholar
  40. Georghiou, G.P. and Hawley, M.K. (1971) Insecticide resistance resulting from sequential selection of houseflies in the field by organophosphorous compounds, Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 45, 43–51.Google Scholar
  41. Georghiou, G.P., Hawley, M.K., Loomis, E.C. and Coombs, M.F. (1972) Insecticide resistance in houseflies in California, Calif. Agric., Sept. 72, 4-6.Google Scholar
  42. Gotaas, H.B. (1956) Composting. Sanitary disposal and reclamation of organic waste, WHO Monograph Ser. No. 31, 205 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Groth, U. and Berndt, K.P. (1970) On the behaviour of flies in animal quarters in relation to their control, Angw. Parasitol., 11, 203–213.Google Scholar
  44. Gvozdeva, I.V., Artukhina, I.N., Storozheva, E.M. and Serafimova, A.M. (1972) Changes of susceptibility to organophosphorus insecticides after their many years’ use in a number of populations of Musca domestica L. and Cimex lectularius L. from several regions of the USSR, 13 Internat. Congr. Entomol. Moscow 1968 Proceed., 3, 172.Google Scholar
  45. Hannine, S. ben, and J. Keiding (1967–1968) Strategic fly control in piggeries and cowsheds, Govt. Pest Inf. Lab., Denmark, Ann. Report 1966, 35-37 (1967) Ann. Report 1967, 37-41 (1968).Google Scholar
  46. Hansens, E.J., Benezet, H.J. and Evans, E.S. Jr. (1967) Housefly control and insecticide resistance with continued use of diazinon, ronnel, and dimethoate, J. econ. Ent., 60, 1057–1064.Google Scholar
  47. Hansens, E.J., Evans, E.S. and Shibles, D.B. (1968) Tests of bromophos for housefly control in New Jersey, J. econ. Ent., 61, 833–836.Google Scholar
  48. Hansens, E.J. and Anderson, W.F. (1970) Housefly control and insecticide resistance in New Jersey, J. econ. Ent., 63, 1924–1926.Google Scholar
  49. Hayashi, A., Mukai, S. and Matsuzaki, S. (1972) The resistance level of the housefly to several synthetic insecticides in Kochi prefecture, Japan, Botyu-Kagaku, 37, 91–93.Google Scholar
  50. Hecht, O. (1970) Light and color reactions of Musca domestica under different conditions, Bull. Ent. Soc. Am., 16, 74–78.Google Scholar
  51. Holway, R.T., Mitchell, W.A. and Salah, A.A. (1951) Studies on the seasonal prevalence and dispersal of the Egyptian housefly. II. The larvae and their breeding areas, Ann. Ent. Soc. Am., 44, 489–510.Google Scholar
  52. Johnson, W.H. (1959) Sanitation in the control of insects and rodents of public health importance. Communicable Disease Center, U.S. Public Health Service. Training Guide. Rodent Control Series, IV, 1-42.Google Scholar
  53. Keiding, J. (1956) Resistance to organic phosphorus insecticides of the housefly, Science, 123, 1173–1174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Keiding, J. (1964) Control of houseflies, WHO Inf. Circ. Vector Control, 3, 19–35, (Unpublished document)Google Scholar
  55. Keiding, J.(1965a) Observations on the behaviour of the housefly in relation to its control, Riv. Parasit., 26, 45–60.Google Scholar
  56. Keiding, J. (1965b) Development of resistance in field populations of houseflies exposed to residual treatments with organophosphorus compounds, Meded. Landb. Hogesch. Gent., 30, 1362–1381.Google Scholar
  57. Keiding, J. (1967) Persistence of resistant populations after the relaxation of the selection pressure, World Rev. Pest Control, 6, 115–130.Google Scholar
  58. Keiding, J. (1968) Insecticide resistance in houseflies, Govt. Pest Inf. Lab., Denmark, Ann. Report, 1967, 46-54.Google Scholar
  59. Keiding, J. (1969) Insecticide resistance in houseflies, Govt. Pest Inf. Lab., Denmark, Ann. Report, 1968, 39-44.Google Scholar
  60. Keiding, J. (1970) Insecticide resistance in houseflies, Danish Pest Inf. Lab. Ann. Report, 1969, 43-50.Google Scholar
  61. Keiding, J. (1972) Insecticide resistance in houseflies, Danish Pest Inf. Lab. Ann. Report, 1971, 37-44.Google Scholar
  62. Keiding, J. and Hannine, S. ben (1967) Fly behaviour and distribution in piggeries and cowsheds, Govt. Pest Inf. Lab., Denmark, Ann. Report, 1966, 53-54.Google Scholar
  63. Keiding, J. and Hannine, S. ben (1972) Selective housefly control on farms based on the resting habits of the flies, 13 Internat. Congr. Entomol., Moscow 1968, 3, 186.Google Scholar
  64. Kerdpibule, V. and Hirakoso, S. (1971) Susceptibilities to several insecticides in adult houseflies collected from various districts in Thailand, Japan J. Exp. Med., 41, 541–545.Google Scholar
  65. Kilpatrick, J.W. and Quarterman, K.D. (1952) Field studies on the resting habits of flies in relation to chemical control. II. In Rural areas, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 1, 1026–1031.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Kilpatrick, J.W. and Schoof, H.F. (1956) The use of insecticide treated cords for housefly control, Publ. Health Reports (U.S. Dept. Hlth. etc.) 71, 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kilpatrick, J.W. and Schoof, H.F. (1963) Effectiveness of seven organophosphorus compounds as space applications against Musca domestica, J. econ. Ent., 56, 560–563.Google Scholar
  68. LaBrecque, G.C. and Meifert, D.W. (1966) Control of houseflies in poultry houses with chemosterilants, J. med. Ent., 3, 323–326.Google Scholar
  69. LaBrecque, G.C. and Weidhaas, D.E. (1970) Advances of integrating sterile-male releases with other methods of control against houseflies, J. econ. Ent., 63, 379–382.Google Scholar
  70. LaBrecque, G.C., Meifert, D.W. and Weidhaas, D.E. (1972) Dynamics of housefly and stable fly populations, Fla. Ent., 55, 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lancaster, J.L. and Simco, J.S. (1969) Housefly control by chemical sterilization with apholate, Bull. Agric. Exp. Station, Arkansas Univ., 737, 12 pp.Google Scholar
  72. Legner, E.F. and Brydon, H.W. (1966) Suppression of dung-inhabiting fly populations by pupal parasites, Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., 59, 638–651.Google Scholar
  73. Legner, E.F. and McCoy, C.W. (1966) The housefly, Musca domestioa L as an exotic species in the western hemisphere incites biological control studies, Can. Entom., 98, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Legner, E.F., Bay, E.C. and White, E.B. (1967) Activity of parasites from Diptera: Musca domestica, Stomoxys calcitrans, Fannia canicularis, and F. femoralis, at sites in the western hemisphere, Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., 60, 462–468.Google Scholar
  75. Legner, E.F. and Olton, G.S. (1968a) Activity of parasites from Diptera: Musca domestioa, Stomoxys calcitrans, species of Fannia muscina and Ophyra. II. At sites in the Eastern Hemisphere and Pacific area, Ann. Ent. Soc. Am., 61, 1306–1314.Google Scholar
  76. Legner, E.F. and Olton, G.S. (1968b) The biological method and integrated control of house and stable flies in California, California Agriculture, June 68, 2-4.Google Scholar
  77. Legner, E.F. and Greathead, D.J. (1969) Parasitism of pupae in East African populations of Musca domestica and Stomyxys calcitrans, Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., 62, 128–133.Google Scholar
  78. Legner, E.F. and Olton, G.S. (1970) Worldwide survey and comparison of adult predator and scavenger insect populations associated with domestic animal manure where livestock is artificially congregated, Hilgardia, 40, 225–266.Google Scholar
  79. Legner, E.F. (1971) Some effects of the ambient arthropod complex on the density and potential parasitization of Muscoid Diptera in poultry wastes, J. econ. Ent., 64, 111–115.Google Scholar
  80. Lewis, J.B. and Sawicki, R.M. (1971) Characterization of the resistance mechanisms to diazinon, parathion and diazoxon in the organophosphorus-resistant SKA Strain of houseflies (Musca domestica L.), Pesticide Bioch. and Physiol., 1, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lineva, V.A. (1966) The pattern of the effect of chlorophos upon the ovogenesis of houseflies (Musca domestica L.) in its long application under natural conditions, Med. Parasit. (Mosk.) 35, 217–223.Google Scholar
  82. Lineva, V.A. (1970) The influence of the prolonged action of khlorofos on a natural population of houseflies (Musca domestica L.), Med. Parasit. (Mosk.), 39, 73–77.Google Scholar
  83. Lineva, V.A. (1972) Prolonged exposure of neutral populations of housefly (Musca domestica L.) to chlorophos, 13 Internat. Congr. Ent., Moscow 1968, Proceed., 3, 197–198.Google Scholar
  84. Loaeza, R. McG. and Corona, A.O. (1965) Esterilization de la Musca domestica on apholate, Folia Entomol. Mexicana., Sept. 1965, 3-15.Google Scholar
  85. Lofgren, C.S., Ford, H.R., Tonn, R.J. and Jatanasen, S. (1970) The effectiveness of ultra-low-volume application of malathion at a rate of 5 fluid ounces per acre in controlling Aedes aegypti in a large-scale test at Nakhon Sawan, Thailand, Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 42, 15–25.Google Scholar
  86. Lindquist, A.W. (1956) Effectiveness of organophosphorus insecticides against insects, Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 16, 33–39.Google Scholar
  87. Magaudda, P.L., Sacca, G. and Guarniera,D. (1969) Sterile male method integrated by insecticides for the control of Musca domestica L. in the island of Vulcano, Italy, Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita (Rome), 5, 29–38.Google Scholar
  88. Maier, P.P., Baker, W.C., Bogue, M.D., Kilpatrick, J.W. and Quarterman, K.D. (1952) Field studies on the resting habits of flies in relation to chemical control. Part I. In urban areas, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 1, 1020–1025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Mathis, W. and Schoof, H.F. (1968) Chemical control of houseflies in dairy barns and chicken ranches, J. econ. Ent., 61, 1071–1073.Google Scholar
  90. Mathis, W., Flynn, A.D., Schoof, H.F. (1972) Housefly resistance in the Savannah, Georgia area and its influence on chemical-control measures, J. econ. Ent., 65, 748–751.Google Scholar
  91. Matsuzawa, H. and Fuji’i, Y. (1968) On the sterilizing effect of Hempa on the common housefly, Musca domestica vicina. II. A field test in Sei Island, Jap. J. San. Zool., 19, 210–212.Google Scholar
  92. Meifert, D.W., LaBrecque, G.C., Smith, C.N. and Morgan, P.B. (1967) Control of houseflies on some West Indies islands with metepa, apholate, and trichlorfon baits, J. econ. Ent., 60, 480–485.Google Scholar
  93. Meifert, D.W., LaBrecque, G.C. and Rye, J.R. Jr. (1969) Housefly, Musca domestica, control with chemosterilants and insecticides, Florida Entomol., 52, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Meifert, D.W. and LaBrecque, G.C. (1971) Integrated control for the suppression of a population of houseflies, Musca domestica L., J. med. Ent., 8, 43–45.Google Scholar
  95. Mer, G.G. and Paz, M. (1960) Control of houseflies in rural areas by means of traps, Riv. Parasit., 21, 143–150.Google Scholar
  96. Millar, L.A. and Hooper, C.H.S. (1969) Resistance to insecticides of three strains of Musca domestica L. from Brisbane, Queensland, J. Austral. Ent. Soc., 8, 113–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Miller, R.W. (1970) Larvicides for fly control — a review, Bull. Ent. Soc. Amer., 16, 154–158.Google Scholar
  98. Miller, R.W. and Gordon, C.H. (1972a) Encapsulated Rabon for larval housefly control in cow manure, J. econ. Ent., 65, 455–458.Google Scholar
  99. Miller, R.W. and Gordon, C.H. (1972b) Technical Rabon for larval housefly control in cow manure, J. econ. Ent., 65, 1064–1066.Google Scholar
  100. Morgan, N.O., Pickens, L.G. and Thimijan, R.W. (1970) Houseflies and stable flies captured by two types of traps, J. econ. Ent., 63, 672–673.Google Scholar
  101. Mourier, H. (1972) Release of native pupal parasitoids of houseflies on Danish farms, Vidensk. Meddr. dansk Naturh. Fore, 135, 129–137.Google Scholar
  102. Mourier, H. (1973) Field trials on release of sterile houseflies on Danish farms, Danish. Pest Inf. Lab. Ann. Report., 1972 (in press).Google Scholar
  103. Mulder, R. (1972) 1-(2,6-disubstituted-benzoyl)-3-(phenyl)-ureas, a new group of insecticidal compounds, 14 Internat. Congr. Entomol., Canberra 1972, Abstracts, 259.Google Scholar
  104. Neselovskaya, V.K., Goldina, G.S. and Ryazantsev, V.F. (1968) The use of khlorofos fly-killers in combination with food baits for the control of synanthropic flies, Med. Parazit. (Mosk), 37, 230–232.Google Scholar
  105. Omori, N. and Suenaga, O. (1962) A method of destructing the maggots of housefly and stablefly animal manure by airtight vinyl cover, Endem. Disease Bull. of Nagasaki Univ. 4(1), 52–56.Google Scholar
  106. Oppenoorth, F.J. (1971) Resistance in insects: The role of metabolism and the possible use of synergists, Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 44, 195–202.Google Scholar
  107. Patton, W.S. (1931) Insect, ticks, mites and venomous animals of medical and veterinary importance, II. Public Health, Croydon, England, 740 pp.Google Scholar
  108. Pausch, R.D. (1972) Local housefly control with baited chemosterilants. 2: Field application in enclosed situations, J. econ. Ent., 65, 449–450.Google Scholar
  109. Peck, J.H. (1969) Arthropod predators of immature Diptera developing in poultry droppings in Northern California. Part II. Laboratory studies on feeding behaviour and predation potential of selected species, J. med. Ent., 6, 168–171.Google Scholar
  110. Peck, J.H. and Anderson, J.R. (1969) Arthropod predators of immature Diptera developing in poultry droppings in Northern California. Part I. Determination, seasonal abundance and natural cohabitation with prey, J. med. Ent., 6, 163–167.Google Scholar
  111. Peck, J.H. and Anderson, J.R. (1970) Influence of poultry-manure-removal schedules on various Diptera larvae and selected arthropod predators, J. econ. Ent., 63, 82–90.Google Scholar
  112. Pickens, L.G., Morgan, N.O. and Thimijan, R.W. (1969) Housefly response to fluorescent lamps: Influenced by fly age and nutrition, air temperature, and position of lamps, J. econ. Ent., 62, 536–539.Google Scholar
  113. Pimentel, D. (1954) Relationship of ants to fly control in Puerto Rico, J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 4, 147–151.Google Scholar
  114. Pimentel, D. and Uhler, L. (1969) Ants and the control of house flies in the Philippines, J. econ. Ent., 62, 248.Google Scholar
  115. Privora, M., Pinterova, J. and Maskova, L. (1969) Meat proteins as an attractant for the housefly, Congr. Int. Antiparasit. Milan 1969, 33, 1–6.Google Scholar
  116. Reid, J.A. (1953) Notes on houseflies and blowflies in Malaya, Bull. Inst. Med. Res. Fed. Malaya, 7, 1–26.Google Scholar
  117. Robbins, W.E., Thompson, M.J., Yamamoto, R.T. and Shortino, T.J. (1965) Feeding stimulants for the female housefly Musca domestica L., Science, 147, 628–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Rodrigues, J.G. (1972) The manure acarine complex and its significance in muscid control, 13 Int. Congr. Entomolog. Moscow, 1968, 3, 236.Google Scholar
  119. Ross Institute (1968) Rural sanitation in the tropics, Bull. No. 8, (Ross Inst. Inform. and Advisory Service) London, 47 pp.Google Scholar
  120. Roubaud, E. (1936) The biothermic method of fly destruction and the ease with which it can be adapted to rural conditions, Quart. Bull. Hlth. Org. League Nat., 5, 214–218.Google Scholar
  121. Sacca, G., Scirocchi, A., De Meo, G.M. and Mastrilli, M.L. (1966) Una prova di campo con il chemosterilante Hempa contro Musca domestica L., Atti Soc. Peloritana Sci. fis. matem. natur., 12, 1–2.Google Scholar
  122. Sawicki, R.M. and Farnham, A.W. (1968) Examination of the isolated autosomes of the SKA strain of houseflies for resistance to several insecticides with and without pretreatment with sesamex and TBTP, Bull. ent. Res., 59, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sawicki, R.M. (1970a) Interaction between factors of resistance in a strain of houseflies polygenic for resistance to organophosphorus insecticides, 7 Internat. Plant Prot. Congr. Paris, 1970, 808-811.Google Scholar
  124. Sawicki, R.M. (1970b) Interaction between the factor delaying penetration of insecticides and the desethylation mechanism of resistance in organophosphorus-resistance houseflies, Pest. Sci., 1, 84–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Sawicki, R.M. (1972) Genetics of resistance of houseflies to dimethoate, Rothamsted Report for 1971, 179-180.Google Scholar
  126. Sehgal, B.S. and Kumar, P. (1970) Seasonal fly control through baiting in rural areas, Indian J. Publ. Hlth., 14, 116–120.Google Scholar
  127. Sento, T. (1961) Fly control experiments by improved treatment of animal manure, Endem. Dis. Bull. of Nagasaki Univ., 3(2), 139–144.Google Scholar
  128. Sento, T. (1965) Fly control experiment by the large four roomed closed tank for animal manure, Endem. Dis. Bull. of Nagasaki Univ., 7(1), 38–63.Google Scholar
  129. Singh, P. and Rodrigues, J.G. (1969) Macrocheles mus caedomesticae, current knowledge and status in biological control, WHO/VBC/ 69.162, 1-9, (Unpublished document).Google Scholar
  130. Smith, R.H. and von Borstel, R.C. (1972) Genetic control of insect populations, Science, 178, 1164–1174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Sztankay-Gulyas, M. and Eröss, J. (1970) The susceptibility of Musca domestica to new contact poisons in Hungary, Magya Allatorvosok Lapja, 25, 357–360.Google Scholar
  132. Tarry, D.W., Kirkwood, A.C. and Hebert, C.N. (1971) The response to “black-light” radiation of some common flies of economic importance, Ent. Exp. Appl., 14, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Thimijan, R.W., Pickens, L.G. and Morgan, N.O. (1970), A trap for houseflies, J. econ. Ent., 63, 1030–1032.Google Scholar
  134. Thimijan, R.W., Pickens, L.G., Morgan, N.O. and Miller, R.W. (1972) Housefly capture as a function of number of traps in a dairy barn, J. econ. Ent., 65, 876–877.Google Scholar
  135. Thomsen, M. (1934) Fly control in Denmark, Quart. Bull. Hlth Org. League of Nations, 3, 304–324.Google Scholar
  136. Toppozada, A., Mohamed, M.A. and Eldefrawi, M.E. (1967) Resistance of the housefly (Musca domestica L.) to insecticides in Egypt, Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 36, 937–948.Google Scholar
  137. Treece, R.E. and Molineros, J.A. (1971) Fly control in dairy barns (Dipt.), Ohio Rep. Res. and Develop., 56, 30.Google Scholar
  138. Treece, R.E. and Molineros, J.A. (1972) Fly control in Ohio barnsa II, Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Center. Res. Circ. 189, 1–8.Google Scholar
  139. Varma, R.N., Mahadevan, B. and Dev Chaudhary, S.S.K. (1966) Housefly control in dairy farms with malathion impregnated cords. Part 1., Armed Forces Medical J. India, 22, 281–296.Google Scholar
  140. Varma, R.N., Mahadevan, B. and Lopez, W.A. (1967) Housefly control in dairy farms with malathion impregnated cords. Part II., Armed Forces Medical J. India, 23, 123–126.Google Scholar
  141. Wagner, E.G. and Lanoix, J.N. (1958) Excreta disposal for rural areas and small communities, WHO Monograph Ser. No. 39, 187 pp.Google Scholar
  142. Wagoner, D.E., Johnson, O.A. and Nickel, C.A. (1971) Fertility reduced in a caged native housefly strain by the introduction of strains bearing heterozygous chromosomal translocations, Nature, 234, 473–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Walsh, J.D. (1964) A survey of fly production in cattle feedlots in the San Joaquin Valley, Calif. Vector Views, 11, 33–39.Google Scholar
  144. Weidhaas, D.E. (1968) Field development and evaluation of chemosterilants, In: Principles of insect chemosterilization, North-Holl. Publ. Co. Amsterdam. edit. LaBrecque, G.C. et al. 354 pp., pp. 275-314.Google Scholar
  145. Weidhaas, D.E. and LaBrecque, G.C. (1970) Studies on the population dynamics of the housefly, Musca domestica, Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 43, 721–725.Google Scholar
  146. West, L.S. (1951) The housefly, Comstock Pub. Co. Ithaca, N.Y., 584 pp.Google Scholar
  147. Wharton, R.H., Seow, C.L., Ganapathipillai, A. and Jabaratnam, G. (1962) Housefly populations and their dispersion in Malaya with particular reference to the fly problem in the Cameron Highlands, Med. J. Malaya, 17, 115–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Whitten, M.J. (1970) Genetics of pests in their management, In: Concepts of pest management, R.L. Rabb and F.E. Guthrie (ed.) Raleigh, USA, 119-135.Google Scholar
  149. Whitten, M.J. (1971) Insect control by genetic manipulation of natural populations, Science, 171, 682–684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. WHO (1970) Insecticide resistance and vector control, 17th Rep. WHO Expert Committee on Insecticides (Nov. 1968), Wld Hlth Org. techn. Rep. Ser., 443, 279 pp., 196-205.Google Scholar
  151. Wichmand, H. (1953) Control of multi-resistant houseflies (with parathion bands), Nature, 172, 758–759.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Wiesmann, R. (1960) Untersuchungen über die Sinnesfunktionen der Antennen von Musca domestica L. in Zusammenhang mit dem Köderproblem, Mitt. Schweiz. Ent. Ges., 33., 121–154.Google Scholar
  153. Wicht, M.C. and Rodrigues, J.G. (1970) Integrated control of Muscid flies in poultry houses using predator mites, selected pesticides and microbial agents, J. med. Ent., 7, 687–692.Google Scholar
  154. Wilkinson, C.F. (1968) The role of insecticide synergists in resistance problems, Wld. Rev. Pest Contr., 7, 155–168.Google Scholar
  155. Wilkinson, C.F. (1971) Effects of synergists on the metabolism and toxicity of anticholinesterases, Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 44, 171–190.Google Scholar
  156. Wright, J.E. and Spates, G.E. (1972) Laboratory evaluation of compounds to determine juvenile hormone activity against the stable fly, J. econ. Ent., 65, 1346–1349.Google Scholar
  157. Yasutomi, K. and Keiding, J. (1969) Effect of synergists on resistance to insecticides (in houseflies), Govern. Test Inf. Lab. Denmark, Ann. Report 1968, 45-46.Google Scholar
  158. Zakharova, N.F. (1971) Experiments on hempa as a chemosterilant of houseflies, Med. Parazit. (Mosk.), 40, 21–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Keiding
    • 1
  1. 1.Danish Pest Infestation LaboratoryLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations