Advertisement

Ion Irradiation and Flux Pinning in Type II Superconductors

  • Herbert C. Freyhardt
  • Anthony Taylor
  • Benny A. Loomis

Abstract

Niobium foils containing 10 and 900 wt ppm oxygen were irradiated with 3.5 MeV 58Ni +to between 50 and 100 displacements per atom. The irradiation at 900°C produced a bimodal void distribution with a large number of small voids and with large diameter voids that act as strong pinning centers for fluxoids in type II superconductors. Transverse critical current measurements showed a substantial increase in both the upper critical field Hc2 and the critical current density Jc. Jc was anisotropic and exhibited a maximum for fluxoids parallel to the irradiated surface. From the void size and number densities, determined by transmission electron microscopy, interaction forces between fluxoids and voids as well as volume pinning forces are estimated and compared with the experimental results.

Keywords

Critical Current Density Dislocation Loop Void Size flUX Pinning Pure Niobium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    A. M. Campbell and J. E. Evetts, Adv. in Physics 21 (1972) 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2).
    D. I. R. Norris, Radiation Effects, 14 (1972) 1;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2a).
    D. I. R. Norris, Radiation Effects 15 (1972) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3).
    “Radiation — Induced Voids in Metals”, USAEC Technical Information Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, CONF-710601 (1972) and “Voids Formed by Irradiation of Reactor Materials”, Proc. Brit. Nucl. Energy Soc., Reading, U.K. (1971).Google Scholar
  5. 4).
    B. A. Loomis and S. B. Gerber, Acta Met., 21 (1973) 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5).
    These measurements have been performed in the experimental set-up of M. A. Kirk, ANL, whom we would like to thank for the help.Google Scholar
  7. 6).
    Calculated by T. D. Ryan using D. K. Brice, RASE3 and DAMG2: Routines for Ion Implantation Calculations, Sandia Laboratories Report SLA-73–0416 (April 1973). Diffusion effects at the irradiation temperature have not been taken into account.Google Scholar
  8. 7).
    B. A. Loomis, A. Taylor, T. E. Klippert and S. B. Gerber,SPI Proc. Int. Conf. on “Defects and Defect Clusters in B.C.C. Metals and their Alloys”, R. J. Arsenault (editor), Nuclear Metallurgy, vol. 18 (1973), p.332.Google Scholar
  9. 8).
    J. E. Crow, M. Strongin, R. S. Thompson and O. F. Kammerer, Phys. Letters, 30 A (1969) 161;Google Scholar
  10. 8a).
    W. De Sorbo, Phys. Rev., 132 (1963) 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 9).
    H. C. Freyhardt and K. L. Merkle, unpublished.Google Scholar
  12. 10).
    R. Labusch, Crystal Lattice Defects, 1 (1969) 1.Google Scholar
  13. 11).
    R. Labusch, Phys. Stat. Sol., 31 (1969) 439.Google Scholar
  14. 12).
    H. C. Freyhardt, Phil. Mag. 23 (1971) 345 and 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 13).
    F. V. Nolfi, Jr., Scripta Metallurgia, in print.Google Scholar
  16. 14).
    Measurements, performed at the Institut für Metallphysik, Göttingen, Germany.Google Scholar
  17. 15).
    H. C. Freyhardt, B. A. Loomis, P. Okamoto and A. Taylor, to be published.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herbert C. Freyhardt
    • 1
  • Anthony Taylor
    • 1
  • Benny A. Loomis
    • 1
  1. 1.Argonne National LaboratoryArgonneUSA

Personalised recommendations