Lattice Location of Impurities Implanted into Metals

  • H. de Waard
  • L. C. Feldman


The method of ion implantation has made it possible to substitute impurities in lattice sites of metals in a number of cases where more usual methods such as diffusion or alloying fail, due to the insolubility of the impurity in the host metal or due to its high chemical reactivity with the host.


Hyperfine Interaction Hyperfine Field Lattice Location Mossbauer Spectrum Effective Magnetic Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    The general theory is given in S. R. de Groot, H. A. Tolhoek and W. J. Huiskamp, Alpha, Beta and Gamma-ray Spectroscopy (Ed. K. Siegbahn, North Holland, Amsterdam 1968) p 1199. The notation used in Eq. (1) is close to that of R. J. Blin Stoyle and M. A. Grace, Handbuch der Physik 42 (Springer, Munchen) 555.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Niesen, Thesis, Leiden, Netherlands, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Pattijn, R. Coussement, G. Dumont, E. Schoeters, R. E. Silverans and L. Vanneste (Louvain) to be published,,Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. K. S. Koene and H. Postma, to be published in Nuclear Physics.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. R. Andrews, T. F. Knott, F. M. Pipkin and D. Santry, Physics Letters 26A, 58 (1967).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. G. E. Reid, M. Scott and N. J. Stone, Hyperfine Structure and Nuclear Radiations (Ed. F. Matthias and D. A. Shirley, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1968) p 719.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. J. Stone in Ref. 6, p 240.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. de Waard, P. Schurer, P. Inia, L. Niesen and Y. K. Agarwal, Hyperfine Interactions in Excited Nuclei (Ed. G. Goldring and R. Kalish, Gordon and Breach, London, 1971) p 89.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Frauenfelder and R. M. Steffen, Alpha, Beta and Gamma-ray Spectroscopy (Ed. K. Siegbahn, North Holland, Amsterdam 1968) P 997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Grodzins, in Ref. 6, p 607.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. G. Stokstad, R. A. Moline, C. A. Barnes, F. Boehm and A. Winther, in Ref. 6, p 699.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Braunsfurth, J. Morgenstern, H. Schmidt and H. J. Körner, Z. Physik 202, 321 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O. Klepper and H. Spehl, Z. Physik 215, 17 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Bosch and O. Klepper, Z. Physik 240, 153 (l970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. G. Devare and H. de Waard, Phys. Rev. 5B, 134 (1972).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. G. Devare and H. de Waard, Physica Status Solidi 52, 134 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Marmor, S. Cochavi and D. B. Fossan, Phys. Rev. Letters 25, 1033 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    All references to this case have been collected in Ref. 56.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. S. Raghavan, P. Raghavan, E. N. Kaufmann, K. Krien and R. A. Naumann, Phys. Rev. 7, 4132 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Bodenstedt, private communication to E. N. Kaufmann, see Ref. 2 in Ref. 52.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Behar and R. M. Steffen, Phys. Rev, C1, 788 (1973).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. N. Kaufmann, P. Raghavan, R. S. Raghavan, K. Krien, E. Ansaldo and R. A. Naumann, Proceedings of this conference.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Krien, to be published.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. N. Kaufmann, R. S. Raghavan, P. R. Raghavan, K. Krien and R. A. Naumann, to be published.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Haas, private communication to R. S. Raghavan.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. M. McDonald, P. M. S. Lesser and D. B. Fossan, Phys. Rev. Letters 28, 1057 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. Bleck, R. Butt, H. Haas, W. Ribbe and W. Seitz, Phys. Rev. Letters 29, 1371 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. Brenn, G. D. Spronse and O. Klepper, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, supplement 34, 175 (1973).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. Minamisono, K. Matuda, A. Mizobuchi and K. Sugimoto, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 30, 311 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. U. Andersen, E. Laegsgaard and L. C. Feldman, Rad. Eff. 12, 219 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R. L. Mossbauer, Z. Physik 151, 124 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 31a.
    R. L. Mossbauer, Naturwissenschaften 45, 538 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 32.
    N. N. Greenwood and T. C. Gibb, Mossbauer Spectroscopy (Chapman and Hall, London 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 33.
    W. Mansel, G. Vogl, W. Vogl, H. Wenzl and D. Barb, Physica Status Solidi 40 , 46l (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 34.
    H. de Waard, “Mössbauer spectroscopy and its applications” (Intern. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1972.), p 123.Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    H. de Waard, R. L. Cohen and S. R. Reintsema, to be published.Google Scholar
  37. 36.
    S. A. Drentje, S. R. Reintsema and A. N. Kalkman, Proceedings of this conference.Google Scholar
  38. 37.
    R. L. Cohen, G. Beyer and B. I. Deutch, Proceedings of this conference.Google Scholar
  39. 38.
    H. P. Wit and L. Niesen (Groningen) private communication.Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    S. R. Reintsema (Groningen), private communication.Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    R. Coussement et al., communicated at the hyperfine interactions conference held at Liege Belgium from Sept. 4–7, 1973.Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    P. Inia, Thesis, Groningen 1971.Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    R. B. Alexander and J. M. Poate, “Proceedings of the International Conference on Ion Implantation into Semiconductors and Other Materials”, (B. Crowder ed.) Plenum Press 1973. and Phys. Rev. (to be published).Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    F. Abel, M. Bruneaux, C. Cohen, H. Bernas, J. Chaumont and L. Thome, Solid State Communications 13, 113 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 44.
    L. C. Feldman and D. Murnick, Phys. Rev. B5, 1 (1972).Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    R. B. Alexander, Harwell Report No. AERE R-6849 (l97l).Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    L. C. Feldman, E. N. Kaufmann, J. M. Poate and W. M. Augustyniak, “Proceedings of the International Conference on Ion Implantation in Semiconductors and Other Materials”, Plenum Press 1973.Google Scholar
  48. 47.
    E. N. Kaufmann and Jack R. MacDonald, private communication.Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    R. A. Boie, W. Darcy, R. Hensler and Jack R. MacDonald, to be published.Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    R. A. Boie, Jack R. MacDonald and J. M. Poate, private communication.Google Scholar
  51. 50.
    R. B. Alexander and L. C. Feldman, unpublished work.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    R. B. Alexander, E. J. Ansaldo, B. I. Deutch, L. C. Feldman and J. Geliert (proceedings of this conference).Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    L. C. Feldman, E. N. Kaufmann, D. W. Mingay and W. M. Augustyniak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1145 (l97l).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 53.
    S. T. Picraux and F. L. Vook (proceedings of this conference).Google Scholar
  55. 54.
    D. Domeij, Arkiv Fysik 32, 179 (1966).Google Scholar
  56. 55.
    H. D. Carstanjen and R. Sizmann, Physics Lett. 40A, (1972).Google Scholar
  57. 55a.
    H. Fischer, R. Sizmann and F. Bell, Z. Physik 224, 135 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 56.
    E. N. Kaufmann, J. Poate and W. M. Augustyniak, Phys. Rev. B7, 951 (1973).Google Scholar
  59. 57.
    L. C. Feldman and E. N. Kaufmann (unpublished results).Google Scholar
  60. 58.
    R. B. Alexander and R. J. Petty, to be published.Google Scholar
  61. 59.
    L. S. Darken and R. W. Gurry, “Physical Chemistry of Metals”, McGraw-Hill Book Co., N. Y. (1953).Google Scholar
  62. 60.
    W. Hume-Rothery, R. E. Smallman and C. W. Haworth, “The Structure of Metals and Alloys (Institute of Metals, London, 5th edition) 1969.Google Scholar
  63. 61.
    C. P. Flynn, Physics Letters 41A, 45 (1972).Google Scholar
  64. 62.
    C. Hohenemser, R. Reno, H. C. Benski and J. Lehr, Phys. Rev. 184, 298 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. de Waard
    • 1
    • 2
  • L. C. Feldman
    • 1
  1. 1.Bell LaboratoriesMurray HillUSA
  2. 2.University of GroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations