Skip to main content

The Reactivity of Wistar Rats Highly Selected for Good and Bad Learning, Observed in Various Physiological and Pharmacological Test Models. 1st. Communication

  • Chapter
Memory and Transfer of Information

Abstract

Preliminary investigations on selected rats, bred from Wistar WU/Ivanovas since 1966, presented the following results:

  1. 1.

    No differences could be detected between GL and BL as far as the pharmacological action on peripheral organs and receptors are concerned, viz. inflammation by means of Freund’s adjuvant, sensitivity to nor-adrenalin of the vascular system and sensitivity to carbachol and acetylcholine of cholinergic receptors in the gastrointestinal tract.

  2. 2.

    Without detectable differences in GL and BL were the effects of centrally acting substances such as myotonolytic tranquilizers, cataleptics, convulsants and narcotics.

  3. 3.

    Equally undifferentiated were pain sensitivity and exploration behaviour in both strains. These factors, therefore, do not come into consideration as causal agents of the differences in learning capacity of GL and BL.

  4. 4.

    Contrary to this, GL generally appeared to be slightly more sensitive to central stimulants and the sympathomimetic amphetamine, BL, however, distinctly more sensitive to the cholinergic tremorine(induced tremor). This is in accordance with the concepts of KHAVARI (1971) and LEITH and BARRETT (1971). KHAVARI assumes “implication of a dichotomous CNS adrenergic-cholinergic neurotransmitter mechanism in the control of learned behaviour”. LEITH and BARRETT conclude that “differences between strains in the avoidance performance are, at least partially, related to variations in the relative activity of the cholinergic and adrenergic systems”. Our own observations, however, demonstrated here a marked overlapping with the sex differences.

  5. 5.

    Distinct sex differences often exist.

  6. 5.1.

    The female animals are more sensitive to the chemical pain stimulant phenylbenzoquinone and explore slightly more frequently than the males. This could explain, at least in part, a difference in learning ability between the two sexes of the same strain.

  7. 5.2.

    In contradistinction to this, the females are more insensitive to two centrally acting muscle relaxants (at a higher level of the basic tonus), two narcotics and two cataleptics. A prominent sex difference was brought about by the cataleptic tetrabenazine. This sex difference could also be demonstrated in the control animals of two unselected strains. No sex differences in the narcotic action could be observed after hexobarbital administration. It is envisaged to extend our studies with GL and BL.

    The last contribution contains a literature survey as well as an extensive discussion on the results of our own investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  • Benesova, O., and V. Benes: The relation between the type of higher nervous activity, some biochemical parameters and the reactivity to drugs. Act. nerv. sup. 10, 223–231 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, T. B., Jr., and D. F. Lott: Stock and sex specifity in the response of rats to pentobarbital sodium. Labor. Anim. Care 18, 192–194 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Courvoisier, S., R. Ducrot, and L. Julou: Psychotropic Drugs. In: S. Garattini and V. Ghetti), p. 373, Elsevier, Amsterdam 1957, cited by Taeschler

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, A. L., and H. J. Kupferberg: Heat loss and heat production in d-amphetamine hyperthermia in two strains of aggregated mice. Pharmacologist 13, 2: 306 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. J., and A. M. Mood: A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 43, 109–126 (1948), and in Finney, D. J.: Staircase Estimation Probit Analysis, 2nd Ed., pp. 226–235 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleckenstein, A.: Symposium International on Drugs and Metabolism of Myocardium and Striated Muscle. Ed. by M. Lamarche and R. Roye, Nancy 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J.: Strain differences in the effects of chlorpromazine and chlordiazepoxide upon active and passive avoidance in mice. Psychopharmacologia 16, 261–271 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrecht, J.: Zur routinemäßigen Prüfung antiphlogistischer Substanzen im Rattenpfotentest. Arzneimittel forsch. 4, 607–614 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornykiewicz, O.: Dopamine (3-hydroxytyramine) and brain functions. Pharmacol. Reviews 18, 925–964 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Isom, G. E., R. B. Nelson, and A. I. Edlin: A comparison of the lethal and respiratory effects of morphine in Long-Evans and Sprague-Dawley rats. Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 182, 130–138 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khavari, K. A.: Adrenergic-cholinergic involvement in modulation of learned behavior. J. comp, physiol. Psych. 74, 281–291 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlenkampf, C., and G. Tarnow: Ein eigentümliches Syndrom im oralen Bereich bei Megaphenapplikation. Nervenarzt 27, 178 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leith, N. J., and R. J. Barrett: Relationship of adrenergic and cholinergic systems to strain differences in avoidance performance. Pharmacologist 13, 232 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, R.: Versuche am überlebenden Dünndarm von Säugetieren. Arch. ges. Physiol. 102, 123–151 (1904).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Whitney: The Mann-Whitney U-Test. In: Nonparametric Statistics (S. S. Siegel, ed.), pp. 116–117, Mc. Graw Hill, Book Comp., New York (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Calgan, H: Teste des psychotropen Screening, Ratte (unveröffentlichte Methodensammlung).

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Calgan, H., S. Sommer, and H.-J. Jesdinsky: Bewertung psychotroperPharmaka an Ratten durch ED5Q-Schätzung mit der Auf- und Ab-Methode nach DIXON-MOOD. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 260, 178 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Calgan, H., and S. Sommer: Das Reserpin-Parkinsonoid beim Schimpansen und seine Behandlung mit Fencamfamin. Arch. Pharmak. exp. Path. 260, 177 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbould, B. B.: Chemotherapy of arthritis induced in rats by mycobacterial adjuvant. Brit. J. Pharmacol. Chemother. 21, 127–136 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, H., R. Rushton, and C. Tinson: Modification of the effects of an amphetamine-barbiturate mixture by the past experience of rats. Nature 192, 533–535 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stille, G.: Zur Pharmakologie katatonogener Stoffe. Editio Cantor, Aulendorf i. Württb. 1971, Arzneimittelforsch. 21, (1.–6. Mitteilung), 225; 997 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H.: The pluricausal cardiopathies. Ch. C. Thoma Publ. Springfield/Ill., p. 114 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, R. E., and J. H. Tilden: Pithed rat preparation suitable for essaying pressor substances. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 64, 453–455 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, K., W. O. Boggan, and B. J. Griek: Pharmaco-genetic correlates of pentylentetrazol and electro-convulsive seizure thresholds in mice. Psychopharmacologia 13, 181–188 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taeschler, M., H. Weidmann, and A. Cerletti: Zur Pharmakologie von Pönal id, einem neuen zentralen Anticholinergikum. Schweiz. Med. Wschr. 92, 1542–1545 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon, F. in Siegel, S. S.: The Wilcoxon-Matched-pairs signed-ranks test. Mc. Graw Hill Book Comp., New York, pp. 75–83 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1973 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Müller-Calgan, H., Becker, K.H., Enenkel, H.J., Schliep, H.J., Wild, A.J.N. (1973). The Reactivity of Wistar Rats Highly Selected for Good and Bad Learning, Observed in Various Physiological and Pharmacological Test Models. 1st. Communication. In: Zippel, H.P. (eds) Memory and Transfer of Information. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2052-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2052-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2054-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2052-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics